Jump to content

Beat KC? Beat Hill and Kelce, 41 Catches, 536 YDS, 4 TD's


Mikie2times

Recommended Posts

Like most of you, today’s aftermath was pretty brutal. I’m searching for any silver lining or factoid to understand more.  

In this game, yes, it came down to 13 poorly managed seconds. That said what will it come down to in the future? This is a young enough Chiefs team currently on its 4th consecutive AFC championship game and possibly 3rd consecutive SB. They aren’t going anywhere. Even if more competition is being added in this thing will run through KC for the foreseeable future until proven otherwise.

 

I don’t look at this anymore like it’s about beating Mahomes. We matched QB play yesterday and I feel comfortable saying only two QB’s in the NFL can literally do anything on the field. Burrow and Herbert could be incredible players but they will never be like Mahomes or Josh. The improvisation and athletic ability on both while slightly different, is unique to only those two.  

 

What has really been the difference maker in the two playoff games and how do we get over the hurdle?

 

Hill and Kelce in two playoff games have been targeted 48 times, they have 41 catches, 536 yards, and 4TD’s.  That is the problem with KC. Our defense, going into the game knows the two players who will be highlighted by KC and it’s not that we can’t stop them. I don’t think anybody can stop them. The problem is they perform BETTER against us than they do on average.

 

If you broke down these stats to individual averages, they average 10.25 catches, 134 yards, and 1 TD per game against Buffalo the last two years in the Playoffs. This year, in 16 games started by both, they averaged 6.34 catches, 73.86 yards, and .56 TD’s. They average close to double the production against our defense than they do in the regular season.

 

Even looking at the final two minutes of yesterdays game. You let Hill take a crosser to the house and then just give Kelce the seam for the FG. Our “better” defense becomes more neutral with QB’s this good. Even though Diggs is special and Knox looks like he might be, they’re not at the level of Hill and Kelce at this time.  

 

Some might say we need to focus on getting home against Mahomes or we need to get a home game. These things can help with the above issue. Bottom line, we need to be better at defending the two clearest threats of the KC offense and up until this point we have shown to be absolutely awful at it. It feels somewhat schematic driven as we are built to defend the pass more than the run so reduction in defensive performance against averages just seems improbable.

 

Is anybody else seeing this similar to me right now? Outside of Allen and Mahomes, who changed the trajectory of the game yesterday? Clearly Davis, but he’s not ready to be in this conversation just yet. Outside that it’s the usual suspects that we don’t seem to have any answer for.   

Edited by KzooMike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, KzooMike said:

Like most of you, today’s aftermath was pretty brutal. I’m searching for any silver lining or factoid to understand more.  

In this game, yes, it came down to 13 poorly managed seconds. That said what will it come down to in the future? This is a young enough Chiefs team currently on its 4th consecutive AFC championship game and possibly 3rd consecutive SB. They aren’t going anywhere. Even if more competition is being added in this thing will run through KC for the foreseeable future until proven otherwise.

 

I don’t look at this anymore like it’s about beating Mahomes. We matched QB play yesterday and I feel comfortable saying only two QB’s in the NFL can literally do anything on the field. Burrow and Herbert could be incredible players but they will never be like Mahomes or Josh. The improvisation and athletic ability on both while slightly different, is unique to only those two.  

 

What has really been the difference maker in the two playoff games and how do we get over the hurdle?

 

Hill and Kelce in two playoff games have been targeted 48 times, they have 41 catches, 536 yards, and 4TD’s.  That is the problem with KC. Our defense, going into the game knows the two players who will be highlighted by KC and it’s not that we can’t stop them. I don’t think anybody can stop them. The problem is they perform BETTER against us than they do on average.

 

If you broke down these stats to individual averages, they average 10.25 catches, 134 yards, and 1 TD per game against Buffalo the last two years in the Playoffs. This year, in 16 games started by both, they averaged 6.34 catches, 73.86 yards, and .56 TD’s. They average close to double the production against our defense than they do in the regular season.

 

Even looking at the final two minutes of yesterdays game. You let Hill take a crosser to the house and then just give Kelce the seam for the FG. Our “better” defense becomes more neutral with QB’s this good. Even though Diggs is special and Knox looks like he might be, they’re not at the level of Hill and Kelce at this time.  

 

Some might say we need to focus on getting home against Mahomes or we need to get a home game. These things can help with the above issue. Bottom line, we need to be better at defending the two clearest threats of the KC offense and up until this point we have shown to be absolutely awful at it. It feels somewhat schematic driven as we are built to defend the pass more than the run so reduction in defensive performance against averages just seems improbable.

 

Is anybody else seeing this similar to me right now? Outside of Allen and Mahomes, who changed the trajectory of the game yesterday? Clearly Davis, but he’s not ready to be in this conversation just yet. Outside that it’s the usual suspects that we don’t seem to have any answer for.   


These stats are so misleading. The defense held those two guys pretty well in check until the last like 4 minutes of the game. The defense was gassed by then. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allen and the Bills played toe to toe with Mahomes and the Chiefs and the game ended 36 -36 in regulation. A defensive play or different call from the coaches here or there and it would have ended as the second consecutive victory over them at Arrowhead. Is there anyone here who believes Allen wouldn't have taken his team down the field to score in overtime had they won the coin toss?

 

I understand the disappointment today; but, I have no idea why people are acting like there is no possible way this team can beat the Chiefs. They will be good as long as Mahomes is their QB. The Bills will be good as long as Allen is their QB. Last night was an epic performance by the two of them in that 4th quarter. There is no reason to think the outcome can't be different the next time. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


These stats are so misleading. The defense held those two guys pretty well in check until the last like 4 minutes of the game. The defense was gassed by then. 

Meh, you had other angles to work, like how we sort of shut them down more in a regular season game this year when the KC offense had yet to find it's form or how we sort of shut them down last year in a rain home game. The "defense was gassed". Ya, no thank you. If anything you're emphasizing the point of needing to shut them down. When we did, as you're stating, we at least slowed KC down to some degree. Until we no longer could shut them down and not even close when it counted most.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KzooMike said:

Meh, you had other angles to work, like how we sort of shut them down more in a regular season game this year when the KC offense had yet to find it's form or how we sort of shut them down last year in a rain home game. The "defense was gassed". Ya, no thank you. If anything you're emphasizing the point of needing to shut them down. When we did, as you're stating, we at least slowed KC down to some degree. Until we no longer could shut them down and not even close when it counted most.  


sorry, but I respectfully disagree. The game plan was smart. They bracketed both guys well. Hill had 6 catches for 30 Yards until he busted his late TD after the D had been out there for most of the second half. 

if you want to blame anyone, blame the offensive playcalling— they squandered the 3rd quarter on 2-yard RB runs. Kept the D out there all second half. 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last 13 were bad but the offense stalled  middle of the game when Daboll leaned too hard on the run game without giving Josh a chance to run or pass before not converting 3rd downs. When their safety left the game, we never challenged them deep until much later. We played them even for an entire game and lost on a coin flip. There were a bunch of things we could have done to not be in that situation at the end.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


sorry, but I respectfully disagree. The game plan was smart. They bracketed both guys well. Hill had 6 catches for 30 Yards until he busted his late TD after the D had been out there for most of the second half. 

if you want to blame anyone, blame the offensive playcalling— they squandered the 3rd quarter on 2-yard RB runs. Kept the D out there all second half. 

 

Fair enough. I'm not focused on yesterdays what could have we done better. More the future, what do we have to do better. Play calling, game management, and talk of 13 seconds doesn't wildly change future outcomes. If we get aggressive sooner, so does KC. At least you could make that argument. 

 

Even though we contained them for some time in yesterdays game, the explosion late did cost us the game. It's also incredible the level of total production those two have against us in just two playoff games. I also don't think Diggs is the impact player Hill is, regardless of the stats, nor do I think Knox is the impact player Kelce is at this time. I do see those two players as being the difference in this rivalry as we move forward. Our defense is better, although basically equal when facing this level of competition.  Our QB's are all but equal. Our skilled position players are very good, but KC's has two of the most dynamic in the league. Hill's speed is incredible and Kelce is a Hall of Fame TE. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Our defense is the most overrated pile of garbage in the NFL

 

I don't want to see ONE Trevor Semien level QB next year.   

 

That's hot garbage!  LOL.  The D had the game won until somehow they gave up a FG in 13 seconds.  I think we know that is not really on the defensive players.  Got to coach that scenario way better than that  Calling the #1 D in the league garbage is laughable.  How many years does the #1 defense win it all?  You wanna hate on your team?  Enjoy. 

 

 

9 minutes ago, KzooMike said:

Fair enough. I'm not focused on yesterdays what could have we done better. More the future, what do we have to do better. Play calling, game management, and talk of 13 seconds doesn't wildly change future outcomes. If we get aggressive sooner, so does KC. At least you could make that argument. 

 

Even though we contained them for some time in yesterdays game, the explosion late did cost us the game. It's also incredible the level of total production those two have against us in just two playoff games. I also don't think Diggs is the impact player Hill is, regardless of the stats, nor do I think Knox is the impact player Kelce is at this time. I do see those two players as being the difference in this rivalry as we move forward. Our defense is better, although basically equal when facing this level of competition.  Our QB's are all but equal. Our skilled position players are very good, but KC's has two of the most dynamic in the league. Hill's speed is incredible and Kelce is a Hall of Fame TE. 

 

You just saw what game management and play calling at a critical time can do.  Played head to head with KC and had the W.  The coaching was the issue.  You wanna be able to beat KC by 20?  That aint reality. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, nedboy7 said:

 

That's hot garbage!  LOL.  The D had the game won until somehow they gave up a FG in 13 seconds.  I think we know that is not really on the defensive players.  Got to coach that scenario way better than that  Calling the #1 D in the league garbage is laughable.  How many years does the #1 defense win it all?  You wanna hate on your team?  Enjoy. 

 

 

 

 

They are OVERRATED 

 

Is hot garbage a bit much?  Meh.  Jonathan Taylor just scored again....

 

Hey there goes Kelce uncovered down the seam again..........

 

Look at Edmonds miss another tackle.......

 

Ryan Tannehill completes another throw to AJ Brown - incredible poise by the savvy veteran!....

 

 

 

I love my team.  I'll call out the issues when I think there are issues.  This defense is a freaking issue.   

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


These stats are so misleading. The defense held those two guys pretty well in check until the last like 4 minutes of the game. The defense was gassed by then. 

 

I fail to understand how the stats are misleading.  The game is 60 minutes and Hill and Kelce showed up when it counted.

Edited by Chicken Boo
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After playing one of the easiest schedules in the league the Bills d ended the season #1 in total defense and scoring. This may not be a popular take but I'm hoping Frazier moves on. His style of defense allows 8 minute drives and keeps the Bills offense off the field when they're  playing against a good offense. With a guy like Allen who can score points in bunches you need a more aggressive approach to getting the ball back imo. You may give up a big play once in a while but the extra possessions for Josh will more than make up for that. The soft d works fine against lousy qbs who can't sustain drives but Frazier shows no ability to adjust his approach against the better qbs. 

  This embarrassing soft shell defense that blew the game last night in historic fashion has got to go. I can't stand to watch them concede yardage all the way up the field to the more efficient qbs, it's like the death of a 1,000 cuts. It seemed to me that the defense was  more successful when they employed a more aggressive approach vs those qbs .

 They didn't go into the game with a confident  'We 're gonna kick your ass' approach. They went into it with a 'we 're scared of you' approach which showed no confidence in the players and put them on their heals. The result was 560 yards of offense allowed with not a single pass defensed out of 44 passes. Then the humiliating failure to defend 2 plays and 13 secs.

  To add to that failure and humiliation the defense appeared to be concerned with guarding the sideline to prevent KC from getting out of bounds. KC had 3 TOs and only 13 seconds to play! What a bunch of ***** morons! Inexcusable! 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...