Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, The Wiz said:

Bengals trying to lose this game

Bengals HAVE LOST this game already. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, NewEra said:

Please show me evidence that the ball HIT THE GROUND before it hit his hands.  That’s what you’re saying occurred……so show me that that proof exists. Ball touching the ground BEFORE it hits his hands.  

Im not going to fight this forever we will agree to disagree

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, RobbRiddick said:

the Bengals have a defender named Apple. Must have been surreal during the draft when he got picked

Great name for a NHL playmaker

Posted
4 minutes ago, Ralonzo said:


Was there control prior to ground contact? That’s what’s required for it to be an interception. I don’t think he had it secured in his hands prior to touching the ground which is incomplete. The ball is allowed to touch the ground - after securing the catch and provided it doesn’t cause possession to be lost (I.e. ball moves)

 

IMO this was not the case on the interception.

Maybe. But it was so close either way that it is really silly to say that fix is in or that refs suck, like many people in this thread did.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...