Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

Gailey had the same reputation. More from less.

 

Would you not want Josh in Gailey's offense?

I’d take Chan over Roman.  Both have strengths & faults, but Chan was a QB and might have some great insights for a dual threat QB.

Roman, not so much.

Posted
3 hours ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:


honestly I think the backup Huntley is it? Can do just as good as or be a better passing than Lamar. 
 

 

Thats a bit bold IMO.

 

Lamar is still a good QB.

 

He has got flaws for sure, but he is such a dynamic play maker

  • Agree 3
Posted
6 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Wow, that makes sense. 

 

1) Take the DC who took you to 3 straight playoff appearances, #2, #3, #2 defense. 

2) Lose Judon in FA and Peters to an ACL (among other injuries)

3) Drop the offense from #13 (18) to #27 (26) in offensive turnovers, dropping the D from 3rd in the league for opponents drive start to 10th

4) The offense decreases almost as much in rank (from #1 to #7 to #17)

5) Fire the DC

 

Not sure it will help them, but, Harbaugh has been the Ravens HC since 2008 with a W/L record of 137-88, so he's earned the benefit of the doubt I guess

 

Be interesting if they keep Roman

 

 

It has to be something else. I don't think you can logically make a case that one down year on defense is reason to can a coordinator. It's not even his worst season with this defense (in 2015 the Raven's were 24th in defense compared to 19th this season). It has to be some sort of professional disagreement with the organization. 

  • Agree 2
Posted
4 hours ago, LeGOATski said:

Most Bills fans probably feel that way, but it's an overreaction IMO. Roman wouldn't be developing Josh. He'd give Josh a consistent running game, though.

Roman is seriously limited in his ability to scheme and call passing plays. No thanks.

4 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

Their defense was terrible 

Their defense was on IR.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 hours ago, JK Fan said:

Martindale took the bullet for Harbaugh.  It is just a matter of time now for Harbaugh.  Lamar as your QB is not a winning formula going forward.

 

If Baltimore fire John Harbaugh they deserve everything they get.

Posted

I can understand why a lot of people are shocked by this. I am less so. I think it comes down to the fact Don Martindale is a dinosaur running an antiquated blitz heavy defensive scheme best suited to the NFL of 15 years ago. His contemporaries - Chuck Pagano, Mike Smith, Mike Nolan, Rex Ryan have already fallen by the wayside. 

 

It just isn't a defense that really suits the way the league is played on offense now. The way to play defense now is not to sell out for a big play on D but is to focus on preventing the big play on offense. To make those blitz heavy schemes effective now you really need the horses (Tampa run a similar scheme successfully but are stacked in the front 7) and while Baltimore have undoubtedly been hurt by injuries this year if I was in Harbaugh's shoes I would be trying to move to a more sustainable, less star driven, more modern NFL defense. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
5 hours ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:


 

disagree.  
I don’t think Roman would know what to do with a real QB. 

 

Kap, Ty-rod and now Lamar.  
Alex Smith?   Who was never a downfield passer IIRC. 


Roman is a poor man’s shanahan. Good to great running game but can’t call or develop passing plays. 

5 hours ago, BuffaloBills1998 said:

If Frazier leaves ( which I doubt ),  I would bring this guy here. He can coach. I’m really shocked that they haven’t fired Harbaugh. Guy hasn’t done ***** since winning the SB with Flacco

He’s probably got about 2-3 years left depending on Lamar’s development. If LJs progression or quality of play drops, then he will probably be gone and replaced with a ‘offensive minded-coach’. especially if they pay LJ big money

Posted
6 hours ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:


 

disagree.  
I don’t think Roman would know what to do with a real QB. 

 

Kap, Ty-rod and now Lamar.  
Alex Smith?   Who was never a downfield passer IIRC. 

 

Greg Roman is the guy you hire to get maximum offensive production with a limited passer. He is the best run game coordinator in the entire NFL - and yes - I include Shanahan in that. He is one of the most creative coaches in football. People don't associate creativity with running game so he doesn't get the credit he deserves IMO. But his running game is so complex and so multiple and puts defenses in so many binds - especially when he can operate it with a mobile QB. 

 

You are right though. He is not the man you want coordinating an offense where your main weapon is an elite passing Quarterback. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, BillsFan130 said:

Thats a bit bold IMO.

 

Lamar is still a good QB.

 

He has got flaws for sure, but he is such a dynamic play maker


He’s a JAG. 

 

the Ravens had a LEGIT top 5 defense when 🤢 he won the MVP. 

 

Joe Flacco or Trent Dilfer ring a bell?


4 seasons. 4. He still has FLAWS. 
 

No QB is perfect (wait) but after 4 years he is still a guy who isn’t a top 10 passer.  
 

Does he thread a needle? 
Will he take the risk or be like Tyrod and mostly pass to wide open receivers?

 

Edited by SlimShady'sSpaceForce
Posted
4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

I can understand why a lot of people are shocked by this. I am less so. I think it comes down to the fact Don Martindale is a dinosaur running an antiquated blitz heavy defensive scheme best suited to the NFL of 15 years ago. His contemporaries - Chuck Pagano, Mike Smith, Mike Nolan, Rex Ryan have already fallen by the wayside. 

 

It just isn't a defense that really suits the way the league is played on offense now. The way to play defense now is not to sell out for a big play on D but is to focus on preventing the big play on offense. To make those blitz heavy schemes effective now you really need the horses (Tampa run a similar scheme successfully but are stacked in the front 7) and while Baltimore have undoubtedly been hurt by injuries this year if I was in Harbaugh's shoes I would be trying to move to a more sustainable, less star driven, more modern NFL defense. 


 

Martindale came up in the ranks learning and following those guys.  Baltimore has run that type of scheme forever and you are absolutely correct that it is falling by the wayside and they need to find a modern defense.  
 

I will be interested if this means they go outside the organization and bring in someone with a different background.  This is not something they do as an organization often, but they have brought in coaches like Roman when needed.

 

Martindale had it tough because of the injuries on the back end meant you could not effectively attack with the front 7.  The loss of Judon (who was their do it all) also hurt - he was their emotional and physical leader.


I personally would not want him on my coaching staff as a DC, but if you need a LB coach or a guy that can help scheme up an attacking defense for a few plays to break some tendencies- he would be a helpful guy in a suited role.

 

 

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, billsfan89 said:

 

It has to be something else. I don't think you can logically make a case that one down year on defense is reason to can a coordinator. It's not even his worst season with this defense (in 2015 the Raven's were 24th in defense compared to 19th this season). It has to be some sort of professional disagreement with the organization. 

 

Don Pees was the defensive coordinator in 2015.  He was not fired.

Martindale was with the Ravens, but just as linebackers coach, not DC

 

I dunno about "logic", but sure - coordinators are canned for down years (heck, for a few bad games!) all the time in the NFL.  It doesn't have to be logical to happen.  It's called "having a fall guy"

 

Posted
10 hours ago, BuffaloBills1998 said:

If Frazier leaves ( which I doubt ),  I would bring this guy here. He can coach. I’m really shocked that they haven’t fired Harbaugh. Guy hasn’t done ***** since winning the SB with Flacco

 

Hard "No".  Martindale and Frazier do not use the same defensive scheme.  It would be a rebuild defensively to bring someone like Martindale in, like dismantling our #4 Schwartz led defense to re-boot it to Wrecks Ryan's specifications.

 

If by "hasn't done *****" you mean "went through the transition from an aging franchise QB to a new draftee with only one losing season, and went to the playoffs 4 times while winning", OK, but that's not the usual definition.

  • Agree 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

 

Yes.  I dont think Lamar is a good QB.  He wouldnt even be as good as he was without the Roman system.  On the flipside, Roman probably doesnt look that good without a QB like Lamar either.

Stephen A. Smith was saying like two days ago that he'd still take Lamar over Allen.

I want what he's smoking. Wow 

  • Shocked 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, The Firebaugh Kid said:

Stephen A. Smith was saying like two days ago that he'd still take Lamar over Allen.

I want what he's smoking. Wow 


Stephen A is an A bsolute  loudmouth 

If you have to YELL to make a point.  

Posted
10 minutes ago, The Firebaugh Kid said:

Stephen A. Smith was saying like two days ago that he'd still take Lamar over Allen.

I want what he's smoking. Wow 

 

Wasn't Allen leading in the pro bowl voting until players and coaches voted?

 

So evidently, Stephen A. Smith is not alone in his opinion.

 

Incorrect in his judgement (in both our views), but not alone in his opinion at all.

 

11 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

Their defense was terrible 

 

Their defenders were either playing for someone else and not adequately replaced, or on IR

Team jumping from 11 to 18 INTs didn't help

 

Offense dropping from 7 to 17th in the league for points scored didn't help them either.

 

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Wasn't Allen leading in the pro bowl voting until players and coaches voted?

 

So evidently, Stephen A. Smith is not alone in his opinion.

 

Incorrect in his judgement (in both our views), but not alone in his opinion at all.


as I recall Josh was leading 

 

Also.  Top 5 defense and ZERO guys named and

 

the AFC QB’s 2 of 3 are not in the post season 

 

 

Quarterback (3)

Justin Herbert, Patty Mahomes, and 

Lamar Jackson

 

maybe the figured the nominees would actually play in the PB and not preparing for the SB. 
 

Edited by SlimShady'sSpaceForce
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:


yes he was as I call Josh was leading 

 

Also.  Top 5 defense and ZERO guys named and

 

the AFC QB’s 2 of 3 are not in the post season 

 

 

Quarterback (3)

Justin Herbert, Patty Mahomes, and 

Lamar Jackson

 

maybe the figured the nominees would actually play in the PB and not preparing for the SB.

 

That last has never been a factor before

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...