Jump to content

Raiders interim coach: keep or can?  

109 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the Raiders keep Rich Bisaccia as HC?

    • Yes, he's earned it already
      77
    • No, the team needs someone better
      8
    • Only if he wins 1 playoff game
      15
    • Only if he wins 2 playoff games
      6
    • Only if he wins 3 playoff games
      1
    • Only if he wins the SB
      2


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Bangarang said:

No, you get rid of him. The team is playing hard but they are probably at their ceiling.

 

You certainly don’t “give him another year” either. You either commit to him long term or don’t bring him back at all.

 

That's the whole point, if they are at the ceiling/overachieving with Bisaccia why wouldn't you bring him back, give him a full offseason with new draft/FA additions and see what happens.

 

Posted

What players on the Raiders would scare you if you were a DC or OC getting ready to face them?  I think, Waller, and that's it.  They don't have a lot of talent, and their schedule next year is going to be fierce.  So whoever the HC is, isn't going to do great.  

 

If Bisaccia gets the HC position full-time, he'll likely struggle, based on the previous paragraph.  The Raiders job could be the only chance he'll ever get, and he'll be one and done. If he wants to be a HC and stay a HC for a while, he should go to another team.  The Raiders aren't good enough for him.

Posted
14 minutes ago, FilthyBeast said:

 

That's the whole point, if they are at the ceiling/overachieving with Bisaccia why wouldn't you bring him back, give him a full offseason with new draft/FA additions and see what happens.

 


I kinda already explained why. Coaches want trust and stability just like players. It sends the wrong message to the staff and the team to just say “meh we’ll see what happens next year with this guy”. Sounds like a lame duck HC.

 

I think if you bring him back then it needs to be a clear commitment that he is your guy for the next several years, otherwise you thank him for his hard work and move on.

Posted

I have little information so I don’t know, but after doing some light research, I would say no. If he wins a playoff game though I would have to say yes. Ultimately as far as HC is concerned you typically want a mastermind at OC or DC, but preferably a OC, not a ST coach.

Posted
6 hours ago, dpberr said:

He was a hot coaching candidate just a few years ago.  I think there remains a prejudice against special teams coaches as head coaches, despite your John Harbaughs and Bill Belichicks.

 

Joe Judge and his disaster in NY won't help matters - he was a long time ST coach that straight up failed.  

 

Bisaccia and Dave Toub (KC's ST coach) always get the interviews but not the commitment.  

 

And Marv Levys.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Doc said:

My son and I were having this discussion last night.  I asked him if he'd keep RIch Bisaccia.  He wouldn't, I said I would after taking the team to the playoffs despite all the turmoil.  What say you?

He earned another year given the ***** storm in Vegas this year.  

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...