Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

image.png.cdd25e05bf1a30f8397c19e9942d558c.png

 

“(Haack) is coming on nicely, as far as punting. He’s been unbelievable for Bass. He is the best caddie, as I call him, in the league as far as he’s an elite holder. That helps Bass be who he is. He’s a big brother to him. And he’s coaching him up and helping him out. He has a great feel for everything. We just love him in the room. I can’t say enough good things about him,” Farwell said.

 

 

https://billswire.usatoday.com/2022/01/12/what-sean-mcdermott-said-about-bills-punter-matt-haack/

Edited by HOUSE
  • HOUSE changed the title to What Heath Farwell said about Bills punter Matt Haack
Posted
4 minutes ago, eball said:

Funny that you quoted Heath Farwell and not McD.

 

Thanks, I changed it.......no coffee yet

Posted

Haack obv had a bad game last week, but can't completely discount conditions.  If Farwell is being strait with us, the calculation is, does Haack's holding ability outweigh his lack of punting ability?  His punting hasn't been terrible and I'm not sure it's made a difference at any point this year.  I think we're more likely to see a game decided by a field goal rather than punting?

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted
Just now, dorquemada said:

Haack obv had a bad game last week, but can't completely discount conditions.  If Farwell is being strait with us, the calculation is, does Haack's holding ability outweigh his lack of punting ability?  His punting hasn't been terrible and I'm not sure it's made a difference at any point this year.  I think we're more likely to see a game decided by a field goal rather than punting?

The blocked punt vs Steelers was a factor in the outcome of that game.  Not 100% his fault of course, but he didn't get that one away quickly enough, gave them a better chance at the block.

Posted
19 minutes ago, NI Bills Fan said:

The blocked punt vs Steelers was a factor in the outcome of that game.  Not 100% his fault of course, but he didn't get that one away quickly enough, gave them a better chance at the block.

 

Yeah - they whiffed on that protection though.  The twist came in and was barely touched.

Posted
25 minutes ago, dorquemada said:

Haack obv had a bad game last week, but can't completely discount conditions.  If Farwell is being strait with us, the calculation is, does Haack's holding ability outweigh his lack of punting ability?  His punting hasn't been terrible and I'm not sure it's made a difference at any point this year.  I think we're more likely to see a game decided by a field goal rather than punting?

 

I think this a fair take. I will be honest, I was screaming Sunday after his 3rd botched punt. It was almost like he allowed the weather conditions to get into his head. He certainly has his shortcomings, but he has been mostly reliable this season.

 

One punt in particular that could (and should) have played a huge role in changing field position was the overtime punt against the Bucs. After going 3-and-out on offense, Haack boomed one to pin the Bucs back deep in their territory. If the defense did a better job there (and, of course, the refs didn't hose us) that punt would be better remembered.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Big Turk said:

Maybe a knock on Bojo?

 

I hope not because it wouldn’t make much sense.

 

Bass is 28 of 32 this year (with Haack) and 28 of 34 last year (with Bojo). Not much difference. I think Bass was near 100% after Week 7 too.

 

.

Edited by Einstein
Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, dorquemada said:

Haack obv had a bad game last week, but can't completely discount conditions.  If Farwell is being strait with us, the calculation is, does Haack's holding ability outweigh his lack of punting ability?  His punting hasn't been terrible and I'm not sure it's made a difference at any point this year.  I think we're more likely to see a game decided by a field goal rather than punting?

 

I disagree. His punting has been terrible.

 

27th in the NFL in average yards per punt. 25th in forcing fair catches (indiciation of good/high punts). And 23rd in punts downed within the 20.

 

 

.

 

Edited by Einstein
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Einstein said:

 

I hope not because it wouldn’t make much sense.

 

Bass is 28 of 32 this year (with Haack) and 28 of 44 last year (with Bojo). Not much difference.

 

 

87.5% vs 63.6% is "not much difference"??   Let's just be happy Haack's bad game came against the Jets and not a game where it really influenced the outcome of the game. Hopefully he learned something that will avoid a recurrance. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Flipnmi said:

87.5% vs 63.6% is "not much difference"??   Let's just be happy Haack's bad game came against the Jets and not a game where it really influenced the outcome of the game. Hopefully he learned something that will avoid a recurrance. 

 

28 of 34. Typo.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...