Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Nope. Haven't changed my mind. My priority was the Bills getting in the dance. A Colts loss was the best way of protecting that. Made no real difference in the end. We'd have won the division even if the Pats had won that game all other things remaining unchanged. Only change would be our route would be Raiders and then Titans which I might actually prefer. But ho hum. 

Well that's kind of what I'm getting at. No clue how things would have turned out, if Pats had won it could have changed momentum and winning the games they lost. Not knowing what and how much would have changed....you stand by what you said and rather wanting Pat win vs Colts and Bills not having control of their own destiny winning division and getting home game thus putting Bills at 6th or 7th seed IF still making it in??

 

Well I was just curious because I can't wrap  my head around it at all. I noticed in another thread you stated your fandom began around 2002? Not sure but if that is correct, then that may be a reason why it's not that much of an issue to you.

 

See years upon years ago a good while before 2002 when your interest began, Bills and Division rivalry was a very serious thing that rose to the point of hatred, especially with Fins in those days, more serious that the Brady era. Lol, some would try and pick a fight with you if anyone said they rooted for a division rival. Lol,

 

 

 

Edited by Sheneneh Jenkins
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, eball said:

 

Well, those numbers have changed to 64% and 72%, so there are apparently a lot of dumb whales betting the Bills.  I'm still curious as to why the line isn't moving in that direction.

 

Quite simply, it's because your method is not a reliable way to predict line movement.  In fact, it will usually predict opposite of what is right.  Would you be willing to share what odds screen you are looking at?  For example, here's what I'm seeing:

 

Qvd4p2E.png

 

You'll notice that the bigger money is all on the Bengals, Bills, and Bucs, and yet in all three cases, the line has moved towards the Raiders, Pats, and Eagles.

 

Why would that be?  Well, the following quote explains where you're going wrong:

 

2 hours ago, eball said:

 

Well, those numbers have changed to 64% and 72%, so there are apparently a lot of dumb whales betting the Bills.

 

You say that sarcastically but it's the actual truth!  Would it be so surprising to believe that most of the big-money bettors are whales dropping $10,000+ on the favorites alongside regular Joe Sixpack and his $50 bets?

 

The flaw in your analysis is that you believe most big-money bettors are sharps.  They're not, and that's why the lines are moving backwards from where you would predict them to move.  The sharps are on the dogs, as they tend to be.

Edited by harryS
Posted
4 minutes ago, harryS said:

 

Quite simply, it's because your method is not a reliable way to predict line movement.  In fact, it will usually predict opposite of what is right.  Would you be willing to share what odds screen you are looking at?  For example, here's what I'm seeing:

 

Qvd4p2E.png

 

You'll notice that the bigger money is all on the Bengals, Bills, and Bucs, and yet in all three cases, the line has moved towards the Raiders, Pats, and Eagles.

 

Why would that be?  Well, the following quote explains where you're going wrong:

 

 

You say that sarcastically but it's the actual truth!  Would it be so surprisingly to believe that most of the big-money bettors are dropping $10,000+ on the favorites alongside regular Joe Sixpack and his $50 bets?

 

The flaw in your analysis is that you believe most big-money bettors are sharps.  They're not, and that's why the lines are moving backwards from where you would predict them to move.

 

So which way are the sharps going?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

So which way are the sharps going?

 

The Raiders, Eagles, and Patriots.

 

They will go 2-1, losing to the Bills.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

Well that's kind of what I'm getting at. No clue how things would have turned out, if Pats had won it could have changed momentum and winning the games they lost. Not knowing what and how much would have changed....you stand by what you said and rather wanting Pat win vs Colts and Bills not having control of their own destiny winning division and getting home game thus putting Bills at 6th or 7th seed IF still making it in??

 

Well I was just curious because I can't wrap  my head around it at all. I noticed in another thread you stated your fandom began around 2002? Not sure but if that is correct, then that may be a reason why it's not that much of an issue to you.

 

See years upon years ago a good while before 2002 when your interest began, Bills and Division rivalry was a very serious thing that rose to the point of hatred, especially with Fins in those days, more serious that the Brady era. Lol, some would try and pick a fight with you if anyone said they rooted for a division rival. Lol,

 

 

It is fair to say I don't care as much about division rivalries as US based fans who go to games do. I still dislike the Patriots but I have rooted for them in two Superbowls when they have played the one team in the NFL I really do despise. But I maintain the reasons I gave then - for THIS Bills squad it was just get in the dance. Whether that is as the #2 or the #7 mattered less to me. This team can beat anyone and lose to anyone. I just wanted them to get a shot. When we might have been needing a wildcard then getting wildcard rivals beat was my priority. 

Posted
1 minute ago, ScottLaw said:

Nice that they will be practicing outside tomorrow in 30 degree weather when it will be close to 0 on Saturday night…. I’m guessing the Pats are practicing outside all week. 

 

LOL, why Scott, why do you always have to do this? 

Just to even things out, Foxborough weather the next 2 days is in the 40s.

Now if BB flew them to Qaanaaq (Thule) Greenland you might just have something here.

 

FYI, I'm sure there are plenty of seats available on the Patriots bandwagon with many upgrades coming soon.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
15 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Nice that they will be practicing outside tomorrow in 30 degree weather when it will be close to 0 on Saturday night…. I’m guessing the Pats are practicing outside all week. 

hope so, after today high 30s-40 in Beantown til SAT

Posted

One thing I've noticed about Pats fans - their rooting interests these days lie much more in seeing the misery of other fanbases, as opposed to enjoying their own success.

 

Maybe that happens after you win so much. But man, have I seen a lot of sentiments along the lines of just wanting to win to stick it to Bills fans, who they think have gotten "cocky."

 

Self-awareness doesn't seem to really be a thing w/ that crew.

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
12 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

It is fair to say I don't care as much about division rivalries as US based fans who go to games do. I still dislike the Patriots but I have rooted for them in two Superbowls when they have played the one team in the NFL I really do despise. But I maintain the reasons I gave then - for THIS Bills squad it was just get in the dance. Whether that is as the #2 or the #7 mattered less to me. This team can beat anyone and lose to anyone. I just wanted them to get a shot. When we might have been needing a wildcard then getting wildcard rivals beat was my priority. 

Rams, Eagles, or Giants?

Posted
31 minutes ago, harryS said:

 

Quite simply, it's because your method is not a reliable way to predict line movement.  In fact, it will usually predict opposite of what is right.  Would you be willing to share what odds screen you are looking at?  For example, here's what I'm seeing:

 

Qvd4p2E.png

 

You'll notice that the bigger money is all on the Bengals, Bills, and Bucs, and yet in all three cases, the line has moved towards the Raiders, Pats, and Eagles.

 

Why would that be?  Well, the following quote explains where you're going wrong:

 

 

You say that sarcastically but it's the actual truth!  Would it be so surprising to believe that most of the big-money bettors are whales dropping $10,000+ on the favorites alongside regular Joe Sixpack and his $50 bets?

 

The flaw in your analysis is that you believe most big-money bettors are sharps.  They're not, and that's why the lines are moving backwards from where you would predict them to move.  The sharps are on the dogs, as they tend to be.

 

I don't think most big-money bettors are sharps because that's not how you make money over the long run, but they do bet in syndicates which would result in a larger number of bets/$$.  I do hear what you're saying but the line isn't really moving "backwards"...it started at -4 in some areas.  Is it possible the sharps aren't really on this game at all?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Nice that they will be practicing outside tomorrow in 30 degree weather when it will be close to 0 on Saturday night…. I’m guessing the Pats are practicing outside all week. 

do you look for stuff to complain about ? This is not a big deal. Didn't they play in worse conditions last time Pats were here? Do you think they forgot about that and got soft in a few weeks?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, eball said:

 

I don't think most big-money bettors are sharps because that's not how you make money over the long run, but they do bet in syndicates which would result in a larger number of bets/$$.  I do hear what you're saying but the line isn't really moving "backwards"...it started at -4 in some areas.  Is it possible the sharps aren't really on this game at all?

 

Sharp involvement with the Pats is small but present, imo.  The Big 3 market leaders of Pinnacle, Bookmaker/CRIS, and Circa all started at 4.5 and are at 4 now.  (This, despite the public backing the Bills, as discussed).

 

But the team the sharps are really hammering are the Raiders so far, then the Eagles.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, 947 said:

Hopefully Stevenson

Kumerow is a key ST player and also is a solid run blocking WR. My guess is Stevenson and maybe they make Brieda inactive again 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...