Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

It doesn't have to do with the money.. if they thought a dome would give the bills a  better chance to win they would build it 

 

The bills are 12 and 1 at the Ralph in the playoffs... That's not good weather

 

The one advantage we always had.. was kemp Kelly and Allen could throw it in conditions others can't 

 

Building a dome would just allow lesser quarterbacks to have a great game in the playoffs... That's the only fact.. because lots of NFL quarterbacks could have a great game in perfect conditions

 

Almost none are coming to the Ralph in January and having a good game.. that is our advantage

 

I understand your take, but I’m looking at it from purely a state prospective. NY state isn’t concerned with the Buffalo Bills winning football games. Why wouldn’t the state want an open air stadium, if it means the team asking for less money? That’s all I’m saying. I don’t care about the open air vs enclosed debate, but I don’t think it’s fair to say money isn’t a favor for the Pegula’s or the state. Talking all this tough Buffalo people, real football stuff is catnip for the open air stadium supporters, but I can’t look away from money being a big reason to go open air. 

Posted
Just now, SirAndrew said:

I understand your take, but I’m looking at it from purely a state prospective. NY state isn’t concerned with the Buffalo Bills winning football games. Why wouldn’t the state want an open air stadium, if it means the team asking for less money? That’s all I’m saying. I don’t care about the open air vs enclosed debate, but I don’t think it’s fair to say money isn’t a favor for the Pegula’s or the state. Talking all this tough Buffalo people, real football stuff is catnip for the open air stadium supporters, but I can’t look away from money being a big reason to go open air. 

If people want a dome .. you should just say you want a dome because you don't want to sit in the elements 

 

Don't make it about the bills will be a better dome team.. that's not factually true

 

And coming to Buffalo in January has only always benefited the bills and their strong-arm quarterbacks 

 

When we had bad quarterback play maybe the weather didn't help us... But having kemp Kelly and Josh..  we are at a huge advantage compared to whatever quarterback is coming into our stadium 

 

It's always been that way and it will continue... 90% of the time Josh outplays the opposing quarterback by 2x or 3x 

 

And if pegula really thought the dome was the hidden element to a super bowl... He would pony up and get it on.. but he doesn't believe it either

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 2
Posted
26 minutes ago, BUFFALOBART said:

I think that the balance has to be struck, in terms of fan affordability.

I'm all for a Dome, but in reality, I, and a good percentage of season ticket holders, would be priced out of the market.

 

Absolutely...many stakeholders including the fans have needs that go into a new stadium.  I just hope the next stadium is built with a certain degree of the fans in mind and not to satisfy the owners who, like with other teams, want to escape as much cost as possible.  

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

If people want a dome .. you should just say you want a dome because you don't want to sit in the elements 

 

Don't make it about the bills will be a better dome team.. that's not factually true

 

And coming to Buffalo in January has only always benefited the bills and their strong-arm quarterbacks 

 

When we had bad quarterback play maybe the weather didn't help us... But having kemp Kelly and Josh..  we are at a huge advantage compared to whatever quarterback is coming into our stadium 

 

It's always been that way and it will continue... 90% of the time Josh outplays the opposing quarterback by 2x or 3x 

 

And if pegula really thought the dome was the hidden element to a super bowl... He would pony up and get it on.. but he doesn't believe it either

I’ll be at the stadium either way, and the on field product is a debate in and of itself. I think you’re right, Pegula would pony up the cash if he thought a roof was the missing ingredient. I just believe money has to be part of the decision not to enclose the stadium, and anyone who says otherwise isn’t being fully truthful. It’s simply a opinion of mine though. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, BUFFALOBART said:

It will become part of the parking lot footprint that is lost with the new stadium construction.

That's what happened with Mile High and Meadowlands, right?

Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

It doesn't have to do with the money.. if they thought a dome would give the bills a  better chance to win they would build it 

 

The bills are 12 and 1 at the Ralph in the playoffs... That's not good weather

 

The one advantage we always had.. was kemp Kelly and Allen could throw it in conditions others can't 

 

Building a dome would just allow lesser quarterbacks to have a great game in the playoffs... That's the only fact.. because lots of NFL quarterbacks could have a great game in perfect conditions

 

Almost none are coming to the Ralph in January and having a good game.. that is our advantage 

 

We routinely practice outside during the season to prepare for inclement weather.. no other team can do that in Buffalo weather either

 

Bills never practice out side in bad weather.

No advantage for Bills in bad weather as this is a passing team and will be for the foreseeable future as all Super Bowl contenders are.

Bills do not win in bad weather since Allen era.

Bills have lost most games with high winds or bad weather at home in current era.

Orchard Park site is highest avg winds for all NFL teams. Even before taking into account the venturi effect, which enhances wind on field, that the dumb 70's engineers built into Highmark.

 

Edited by cba fan
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, cba fan said:

Bills never practice out side in bad weather.

No advantage for Bills in bad weather as this is a passing team and will be for the foreseeable future as all Super Bowl contenders are.

Bills do not win in bad weather since Allen era.

Bills have lost most games with high winds or bad weather at home in current era.

Orchard Park site is highest avg winds for all NFL teams. Even before taking into venturi effect which enhances wind on field dumb 70's engineers built into Highmark.

 

False

 

Every single coach in our history including Sean McDermott has practiced outside at points during the winter

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Buffalo716 said:

False

 

Every single coach in our history including Sean McDermott has practiced outside at points during the winter

not in bad weather did Allen era do this.

Posted
9 minutes ago, cba fan said:

not in bad weather did Allen era do this.

 

 

It's really tough to go back and find Bill's practice schedules.. but this is video proof

 

2019 practicing outside with deep snow around the outside of the field

 

Weather clearly isn't great 

 

Living here it's known they practice outside at points

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

 

 

It's really tough to go back and find Bill's practice schedules.. but this is video proof

 

2019 practicing outside with deep snow around the outside of the field

 

Weather clearly isn't great 

 

Living here it's known they practice outside at points

like i said and your pic proves. They don't practice in bad weather outside. ty. I am not saying they never do. Just not in bad bad weather.

Edited by cba fan
Posted
1 hour ago, BillsVet said:

 

It's a good question...the stadium scope and quality was reduced to suit the state and the owners.  Meanwhile, the fans who actually pay for it are literally and figuratively left out in the cold.   

 

It's amazing and tone-deaf that the governor of NY actually said that an open air stadium in OP is "part of the Buffalo bravado, which people love to showcase."   Or,  she just reiterating what the committee specified as the best course of action.    

How have the scope and quality been reduced?  How big a stadium does Buffalo need?  60-65,000 is perfect.  The quality will most likely be very high.  1.4 or so billion isn’t “cheap.”
 

If they put a roof on the new stadium would the scope and quality suit you then?  

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, cba fan said:

like i said and your pic proves. They don't practice in bad weather outside. ty. I am not saying they never do. Just not in bad bad weather.

Listen hardly any day is like the day we played the Patriots outside

 

The bills practice in not perfect conditions outside

 

They don't need to be in the middle of a snowstorm to prove what I'm saying

Edited by Buffalo716
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Nextmanup said:

If they are going to put it in Orchard Park, let Pegula pay for every nickel.

 

 

 

Not happening. Hochul already said wherever he wants the stadium is where it's going to be and New York State will do it's part.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, I'm Spartacus said:

What happens to the old stadium? Does it get demolished? Does it stay intact for Bills practices or high school games?

I’m guessing the field house and training facility would remain there, since it’s relatively new and considered state of the art … maybe the area would become “MafiaVille, with hotels and restaurants ( I actually laughed as I wrote that, knowing it will NEVER happen), but more than likely, it’s a parking lot. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

If the State of NY along with the Owner can’t pool their collective resources to construct a simple dome stadium on property they already own and with virtually no additional infrastructure costs to bear…there’s really something WRONG!

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, SirAndrew said:

I understand your take, but I’m looking at it from purely a state prospective. NY state isn’t concerned with the Buffalo Bills winning football games. Why wouldn’t the state want an open air stadium, if it means the team asking for less money? That’s all I’m saying. I don’t care about the open air vs enclosed debate, but I don’t think it’s fair to say money isn’t a favor for the Pegula’s or the state. Talking all this tough Buffalo people, real football stuff is catnip for the open air stadium supporters, but I can’t look away from money being a big reason to go open air. 

A roof in OP makes no sense.   Downtown?  Maybe it would have.  But in OP?  No.  There’s not a lot of events to book a stadium for and conventions wouldn’t book in OP.  There’s nothing else there to do when the meetings aren’t taking place.

 

Building downtown is a money issue, but the bigger issue is the time it would take because of all the things that would need doing outside of actually building the stadium.  And those things might come with unknown costs.

35 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

If the State of NY along with the Owner can’t pool their collective resources to construct a simple dome stadium on property they already own and with virtually no additional infrastructure costs to bear…there’s really something WRONG!

They don’t want a dome.  It’s simple as that.  

Edited by purple haze
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Buffalo716 said:

False

 

Every single coach in our history including Sean McDermott has practiced outside at points during the winter

I like your posts Nanook, but it seems to me the recent home game against Pats* somehow turned out to be advantage black hats, though perhaps that was coaching. I think they held Allen back. Still think if you have an elite offense, optimum conditions favor your team. Also, the older I get, the less I like to freeze. Logic posted some designs that cut down on the wind, which is a fair compromise, though I take it you would be opposed to this as well.

Posted
14 minutes ago, purple haze said:

A roof in OP makes no sense.   Downtown?  Maybe it would have.  But in OP?  No.  There’s not a lot of events to book a stadium for and conventions wouldn’t book in OP.  There’s nothing else there to do when the meetings aren’t taking place.

 

Building downtown is a money issue, but the bigger issue is the time it would take because of all the things that would need doing outside of actually building the stadium.  And those things might come with unknown costs.

They don’t want a dome.  It’s simple as that.  

Well I do -and it’s as simple as That!🤬

  • Haha (+1) 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...