MattyT Posted May 3, 2005 Posted May 3, 2005 Too bad Kellen Winslow's parents didn't think he was better looking. Maybe they would have strapped him to his motorcycle. (or at the very least taught him how to strap a damn helmet to his head!)
/dev/null Posted May 3, 2005 Posted May 3, 2005 its real easy to spend Canadian money. I mean you get several thousand in every box of Monopoly
Guffalo Posted May 3, 2005 Posted May 3, 2005 Did your mom strap you in the grocery cart?????? 327211[/snapback] After attending the tailgates, I can say for certain that several members of this board have never seen the seatbelt in the shopping cart as children. In some extreme cases, I dare say that some of the members were so ugly that thier Moms left them in the car with the windows cracked a bit for air.
plenzmd1 Posted May 3, 2005 Posted May 3, 2005 its real easy to spend Canadian money. I mean you get several thousand in every box of Monopoly 327256[/snapback] Crimini, your right canadian money spends easy!!! especially at the ballett, not that i would know
aussiew Posted May 3, 2005 Posted May 3, 2005 OK - I'll admit it. I'd prefer to strap in a good looking guy than an ugly one.
buffaloboyinATL Posted May 3, 2005 Posted May 3, 2005 Did your mom strap you in the grocery cart?????? 327211[/snapback] I would love to see the criteria they used to determine if a child was cute or ugly, doesn't seem like a very scientific term.
Astrobot Posted May 3, 2005 Posted May 3, 2005 The men were worse than the women. "When a woman was in charge, 4 percent of the homeliest children were strapped in compared with 13.3 percent of the most attractive children. The difference was even more acute when fathers led the shopping expedition - in those cases, none of the least attractive children were secured with seat belts, while 12.5 percent of the prettiest children were." None of the ugly children? Are we men just unwittingly Darwinian?
/dev/null Posted May 3, 2005 Posted May 3, 2005 Are we men just unwittingly Darwinian? 327293[/snapback] no, they just realize that if the kid;s ugly he/she can't live off their looks and will have to start learning how to fend for themself
stuckincincy Posted May 3, 2005 Posted May 3, 2005 no, they just realize that if the kid;s ugly he/she can't live off their looks and will have to start learning how to fend for themself 327299[/snapback] True. Many a company has gone under by hiring and promoting the look good/smell good crowd who had all the brains of a turnip.
ch19079 Posted May 3, 2005 Posted May 3, 2005 Did your mom strap you in the grocery cart?????? 327211[/snapback] "Although the researchers were unsure why, good-looking boys were usually kept in closer proximity to the adults taking care of them than were pretty girls. The researchers speculated that girls might be considered more competent and better able to act independently than boys of the same age." those damn momas boys... but i think the cute kids had smarter parents than the ugly ones.
Recommended Posts