T&C Posted January 4, 2022 Posted January 4, 2022 https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/entertainment/2022/01/04/lawsuit-dismissed-over-naked-baby-on-cover-of-iconic-nirvana-album 2 Quote
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted January 4, 2022 Posted January 4, 2022 Either Crash Test Dummies or Weird Al are going to have to add a verse to 'Mmm Mmm Mmm Mmm'. Quote
Marv's Neighbor Posted January 4, 2022 Posted January 4, 2022 58 minutes ago, TBBills said: Darn no free money for him. No money for nothin? Quote
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted January 4, 2022 Posted January 4, 2022 2 hours ago, Gugny said: Good. What a dick. 🤔 Quote
SoTier Posted January 7, 2022 Posted January 7, 2022 Ummm ... even if there's no signed release from this guy's parents, wouldn't one of them had to have given permission for him to be photographed since he's not alleging he was kidnapped, just that his image was exploited. Obviously, his parents knew what they were doing since they told him. If the record company just took a photo of a naked little baby in a pool and the parents didn't know about it, then that might be exploitive. Of course, then the grown up baby wouldn't know he'd been exploited ... but he did know for years. My guess is that the guy's parents took a cash payment to allow their baby to be photographed rather than going through the formal steps of exchanging their signature(s) on a release in exchange for royalties. Quote
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted January 7, 2022 Posted January 7, 2022 2 minutes ago, SoTier said: My guess is that the guy's parents took a cash payment to allow their baby to be photographed rather than going through the formal steps of exchanging their signature(s) on a release in exchange for royalties. 1 Quote
Nextmanup Posted January 7, 2022 Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/4/2022 at 4:51 PM, Marv's Neighbor said: No money for nothin? At least he gots his chicks for free. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.