Career-worst single-game passer rating

[AlfaBill]

59 minutes ago, Shaw66 said:

So, Josh Allen had a career-worst single-game passer rating.  17.   It's, like, phenomenally bad.  

 

I decided to take a look at the career-worst single-game passer ratings for the super-star quarterbacks.  They're interesting.  

 

The single most interesting thing about the best QBs and their worst days is that, although Allen's day was the second-worst passer rating in the group, Allen is the only guy whose team won the game.  Peyton, Brady, Rodgers, Brees, all lost their worst games.  Why is that?   Because Allen's running brought another dimension to the game that the super-stars didn't have.  

 

Here are the worst games for the super-stars:

 

Peyton:   With the Colts, Peyton threw three interceptions against the Dolphins in his rookie season, lost 41-6 and had a passer rating of 35.   With the Broncos, Peyton lost to the Chiefs 29-13, threw four interceptions and had a rating of 0, the lowest of any super-star. 

 

Brees:  With the Chargers, Brees had a passer rating of 27 against the Bears, threw one interception and lost 20-7.   With the Saints, his low was 37.6, losing to Atlanta 23-13.  

 

Brady's low with the Pats came in the 31-0 loss to the Bills.  He threw 4 ints and earned a rating of 22.5.  With Tampa, he lost to the Saints 38.3 and had a passer rating of 40.4, with 3 INTs.  

 

Rodgers made the Bills the only team to hang an all-time low passer rating on two different superstars, when he racked up a 34.3 rating by throwing three INTs in 21-13 loss.  

 

These are just silly little data points, of course, but I think it's more than pure accident.  Brees, Brady, and Rodgers were, like Allen, playing with good teams, but their teams weren't good enough to bail them out of their worst days.   Allen got the win when the super-stars didn't, not because his team bailed him out, but because ALLEN bailed himself out by being an integral part of the running attack that took over the game in the second half.  

 

Allen isn't throwing like the super-stars, but it isn't absurd to say that is throwing is excellent.  He isn't running like Vick or Lamar Jackson, but he's already established himself as a great running quarterback.   Allen's a much better runner than any of the best throwers, and he's a much better thrower than the best runners - Vick, Newton, and Jackson.   

 

 

Excellent post that puts this into perspective. 

[Rocky Landing]

7 minutes ago, FireChans said:

What stat isn't worthy of being ignored for a single game?  Completion percentage? Yards? INT's?

 

All of those things were bad for Josh last week. His passer rating would indicate he had a pretty bad day passing the ball. Would you disagree he had a bad day?

Nowhere near as bad as the number would indicate. Not even close. 17 is Nate Peterman bad.

 

 

 

Edited January 3, 2022 by Rocky Landing

[NewEra]

Just now, ExiledInIllinois said:

They didn't struggle.  Always got the pass when they needed it most.  Even a 2pt. conversion via a pass.

They always got the pass when they needed it most? 
 

He started the game 6-9 to begin our first  drive, He was 5/17 for the rest of the game. On that first drive, we got to the 3 and he went 0-3 and we got bailed out by an obvious PI before he ran it in.    
 

On the 2nd TD drive he didn’t complete any passes the whole drive, 0-2.  
 

Next drive, he completes one pass and we drive all the way down to the 10 pounding the rock.  Then he throws a pick. No, we

didn’t need him to compete that pass.  

 

next drive-  one more rush, one more pick. 
 

next drive-  incomplete pass 1 rush….. then another pick. 
 

next drive-  5 straight rushes, 1 completion to Cole on 2nd down, then 5 more rushes and a TD and wide open 2 pt conversion pass.

the final 2 drives, he was 3/4 passing 25 yards.  A 15 yard pass to Diggs on 1st and 10.  A 8 yard pass to Diggs on 3rd and 9 and a 2 yard pass to Diggs on 2nd and 5.  
 

He made a few nice third down passes, but that doesn’t mean our passing game didn’t struggle yesterday. It did.

 

 

 

[AlfaBill]

58 minutes ago, Success said:

I guess people could say that yesterday was a rough one for Allen - but he was still magnificent, and still basically carried the team on his shoulders for big parts of the game - albeit w/ more help this time.  I personally didn't think that any of the picks were bad throws. A couple of tips, and then Beasley was interfered w/ on the other.

 

The last line is a good comparison - he really doesn't belong in the "running QB" category, since he is now such a good thrower.  If all he did was pass, he'd still be one of the league's top QB's.  

 

I kind of think the running is a conundrum.  He's so good at it, but every time he has a game like yesterday (or the Bucs, or last week), I always think "this isn't sustainable."  I think it's probably necessary this year, but I'd love to see the Bills evolve to a point where the games aren't so physical for him.

 

Quote

That bothered me because it should’ve been a holding call at least  

 

[FireChans]

5 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said:

Nowhere near as bad as the number would indicate. Not even close. 17 is Nate Peterman bad.

 

 

 

But he still had a really bad day passing.  And because passer rating doesn't include rushing production, it indicates that Allen had a really really bad passing day.  And he did have a Nate Peterman day passing.

 

11/26 for 120 and 3 INT's is a really bad day dude.

[AlfaBill]

4 minutes ago, FireChans said:

But he still had a really bad day passing.  And because passer rating doesn't include rushing production, it indicates that Allen had a really really bad passing day.  And he did have a Nate Peterman day passing.

 

11/26 for 120 and 3 INT's is a really bad day dude.

Not to disagree BUT there were multiple drops, Diggs for a TD, Singletary in the flat, Knox with the no looker, Beasley as well. These all hit the hands of the players. So as JA did struggle so did the receivers. 

Edited January 3, 2022 by AlfaBill

[Sammy Watkins' Rib]

Newsflash.

 

Given who Allen is as a quarterback to not expect him to have eventually the lowest or near lowest passer rating for a superstar quarterback would be unreal unrealistic.

 

The same things that make him a superstar quarterback or the same things that will lead to under 20 past her ratings. But he’s not a one trick pony as evidence to his 60 QBR for his last game.

 

One can argue the merits of QBR but we all saw the game with our own eyes. Allen was a beast on the ground. So I’m not surprised he came out with a respectable QBR.

[LABILLBACKER]

9 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said:

Nowhere near as bad as the number would indicate. Not even close. 17 is Nate Peterman bad.

 

 

 

Alot of that 17 is the low completion %.  On the opening drive I counted 3-4 drops. More drops occurred throughout the game. The Beasley INT should have been a flag. The other 2 were 100% on Josh as a man was standing right there in his passing lane. We need to just focus more on running and shorter passes during bad weather games. Let's not overthink this.

[UKBillFan]

1 minute ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said:

Newsflash.

 

Given who Allen is as a quarterback to not expect him to have eventually the lowest or near lowest passer rating for a superstar quarterback would be unreal unrealistic.

 

The same things that make him a superstar quarterback or the same things that will lead to under 20 past her ratings. But he’s not a one trick pony as evidence to his 60 QBR for his last game.

 

One can argue the merits of QBR but we all saw the game with our own eyes. Allen was a beast on the ground. So I’m not surprised he came out with a respectable QBR.

I don’t think anyone is denying he was great on the ground yesterday? But his passing was poor and he seemed to deviate from good to bad (and back again) rapidly in that respect.

[AlfaBill]

1 hour ago, Success said:

I guess people could say that yesterday was a rough one for Allen - but he was still magnificent, and still basically carried the team on his shoulders for big parts of the game - albeit w/ more help this time.  I personally didn't think that any of the picks were bad throws. A couple of tips, and then Beasley was interfered w/ on the other.

 

The last line is a good comparison - he really doesn't belong in the "running QB" category, since he is now such a good thrower.  If all he did was pass, he'd still be one of the league's top QB's.  

 

I kind of think the running is a conundrum.  He's so good at it, but every time he has a game like yesterday (or the Bucs, or last week), I always think "this isn't sustainable."  I think it's probably necessary this year, but I'd love to see the Bills evolve to a point where the games aren't so physical for him.

 

I love watching him run. He always gets up a smiles he loves the play. But you’re right. How long before he gets hurt? Does the staff not agree? Hopefully this run game continues to improve and he can run less. 

[billsfan1959]

5 minutes ago, FireChans said:

But he still had a really bad day passing.  And because passer rating doesn't include rushing production, it indicates that Allen had a really really bad passing day.  And he did have a Nate Peterman day passing.

 

11/26 for 120 and 3 INT's is a really bad day dude.

 

He certainly had a bad day, stat wise. But his actual play on the field, even just limited to the passing game, could never be considered even close to being Petermanesque...

[ExiledInIllinois]

Josh Allen had 81 yards and 2 rushing TDs.  Alongside a 110 performance by our featured back.

 

Yeah... That don't show in rating. 

[AlfaBill]

50 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

 

Allen is closer in ability to Steve Young (who he watched as a kid) to Vick, Newton and Jackson.

 

 

Young has said it himself an a few occasions. I always like Steve Young. 

[ExiledInIllinois]

On 15 attempts.  JA17 was too busy running to think about passing. 

[Charles Romes]

Interesting that three of those worst games were at Hymark stadium which is notoriously tough to throw in, even when the weather seems OK.  In addition to the winds, there used to be a huge crown on the field as well but I think they softened it. 

[AlfaBill]

46 minutes ago, london_bills said:

I think people who say Allen could have taken more check downs like last week tend to see that Allen could be even better than he is. And we may need that to win it all. No one disputes he carries the team for the most part and is the only 1st rd pick on offence, but if we're in the afc championship game and he doesnt take what is given like last week we might be giving the opponent more possesions

Yes. There’s the deep throw he made to Diggs in the end zone. Low percentage throw when 88 was all alone to his right and would’ve picked up at least a 1st down but probably more. He’s a gun slinger and will always lean that way for better or worse. As the playoffs go deeper (I hope) he’d better look for those easy outs. 

[ExiledInIllinois]

3 minutes ago, Charles Romes said:

Interesting that three of those worst games were at Hymark stadium which is notoriously tough to throw in, even when the weather seems OK.  In addition to the winds, there used to be a huge crown on the field as well but I think they softened it. 

And it looks like they put heating pipes under the field markings... I wonder if moisture refreezes causing uneven field areas?

[FireChans]

6 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

He certainly had a bad day, stat wise. But his actual play on the field, even just limited to the passing game, could never be considered even close to being Petermanesque...

You’re right. Peterman has actually had better games passing than Josh did yesterday. 
 

Unfortunately, it sounds like you don’t like the stat because it makes Josh Allen look bad. There’s nothing we can do about that. Passer rating doesn’t care if you had reciever drops (Josh isn’t the only one who gets hurt by drops in the NFL). Passer rating doesn’t care if your QB is under duress (Josh isn’t the only one who gets pressured). All passer rating cares about is your statistical output and it spits out a number. Josh’s was terrible and thus his passer rating is terrible. End of story.

[Rocky Landing]

5 minutes ago, FireChans said:

But he still had a really bad day passing.  And because passer rating doesn't include rushing production, it indicates that Allen had a really really bad passing day.  And he did have a Nate Peterman day passing.

 

11/26 for 120 and 3 INT's is a really bad day dude.

He really didn't. Even ignoring Allen's ability to extend plays, and some uncharacteristic drops, Allen was good on third, and fourth down conversion (although I haven't found those specific numbers, so I could be wrong-- I don't think I am).

[BillsFanSD]

1 hour ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

Watch the three ints again…the first if Jarrett doesn’t get his hand on it that’s a touchdown as Beasley was waiting to catch it

 

The second he goes to Beasley again and Beasley has a miscommunication with Josh and cuts his route short only the team knows which player is at fault

The third was just a deflected pass at the line that was basically a fair catch 

 

So Josh had a rough day but there was nothing egregious about any of those throws 

Also, he had a TD dropped by Diggs, and he ran a couple in that he might have passed for instead.  Those foregone passing TDs hurt his passer rating in a misleading way.  

 

Obviously Allen had a bad day yesterday, no question.  But he was also extremely unlucky to have passes tipped directly to defenders, and at the end of the day we lost the turnover battle 4-1 but still won the game by two TDs so it's not like it's the end of the world or anything.