HoofHearted Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 (edited) Patriots are running Counter Trey here - pulling the backside Guard to kick and H-Back to wrap up to the inside backer. Every other offensive lineman (other than the backside Tackle) are blocking down on the first DL to their right. The backside Tackle is scooping to the 3 tech to that they can read the backside end (Rousseau). Bills get caught in their 1 Rat Coverage (Man Free). The root of the issue here is how they plan on treating an H-Back across the formation post-snap. There doesn't appear to be any trade rules in place based on how Taron Johnson is playing the H across as he's looking to following him across the field which ultimately leaves the Bills a guy short in the box. Hughes does a good job of getting to heel line, squeezing, and then leveraging the kick. Milano does not do a very good job of getting downhill to fit tight off the tackle and meet the H-back at the heel line which allows Harris room and time to find the cutback. Tremaine does a good job scraping with the pulling guard, but needs to take a slightly more downhill path to meet the tackle, who ends up working up to the second level, closer to the LoS. He HAS to fit outside of the Tackle that works up to him. Harrison Phillips gets completely stood up and then washed out of the play which is what ultimately opens up the cutback lane that Taron Johnson should fill. Dane Jackson gets caught in no mans land as well (and it looks really bad on film), but he's playing man coverage on the outside receiver. Since that receiver is responsible for blocking Taron and he runs across the formation the receiver follows him all the way across which makes Dane have to follow him assuming he's running some type of shallow cross. Our ultimate cut-back defender (Poyer) isn't visible on the broadcast angle so I can't tell what hung him up, but I would guess he got caught with bad eyes. Really good scheme for what we had dialed up defensively on this play. If we'd been sitting in our "soft zone" 🤣 3 high coverages like we usually do on 1st Down this would have been a 3 yard gain as Taron would have been sitting right there for the cutback. Counter Trey What the run fits should have looked like. Edited December 27, 2021 by HoofHearted 9 3 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eee1776 Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 49 Over ran the play 1 1 2 2 5 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike in Horseheads Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 Nice breakdown and interesting to point out that if we ran our usual coverage Taron johnsin would have been standing there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmanfan Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 The team over pursued. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 (edited) TLDR. Paragraphs help. Please explain your jargon so a person who doesn't know WTF "1 Rat Coverage (Man Free)" is might understand WTF you're talking about. Also, 49 overran the play Edited December 27, 2021 by Freddie's Dead 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChans Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 2 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said: TLDR. Paragraphs help. Please explain your jargon so a person who doesn't know WTF "1 Rat Coverage (Man Free)" is might understand WTF you're talking about. Google it baby! 2 hours ago, HoofHearted said: Patriots are running Counter Trey here - pulling the backside Guard to kick and H-Back to wrap up to the inside backer. Every other offensive lineman (other than the backside Tackle) are blocking down on the first DL to their right. The backside Tackle is scooping to the 3 tech to that they can read the backside end (Rousseau). Bills get caught in their 1 Rat Coverage (Man Free). The root of the issue here is how they plan on treating an H-Back across the formation post-snap. There doesn't appear to be any trade rules in place based on how Taron Johnson is playing the H across as he's looking to following him across the field which ultimately leaves the Bills a guy short in the box. Hughes does a good job of getting to heel line, squeezing, and then leveraging the kick. Milano does not do a very good job of getting downhill to fit tight off the tackle and meet the H-back at the heel line which allows Harris room and time to find the cutback. Tremaine does a good job scraping with the pulling guard, but needs to take a slightly more downhill path to meet the tackle, who ends up working up to the second level, closer to the LoS. He HAS to fit outside of the Tackle that works up to him. Harrison Phillips gets completely stood up and then washed out of the play which is what ultimately opens up the cutback lane that Taron Johnson should fill. Dane Jackson gets caught in no mans land as well (and it looks really bad on film), but he's playing man coverage on the outside receiver. Since that receiver is responsible for blocking Taron and he runs across the formation the receiver follows him all the way across which makes Dane have to follow him assuming he's running some type of shallow cross. Our ultimate cut-back defender (Poyer) isn't visible on the broadcast angle so I can't tell what hung him up, but I would guess he got caught with bad eyes. Really good scheme for what we had dialed up defensively on this play. If we'd been sitting in our "soft zone" 🤣 3 high coverages like we usually do on 1st Down this would have been a 3 yard gain as Taron would have been sitting right there for the cutback. Counter Trey What the run fits should have looked like. Awesome breakdown and things we need more of 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 2 minutes ago, FireChans said: Google it baby! I did. The sites that came up used even more impenetrable jargon. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoofHearted Posted December 27, 2021 Author Share Posted December 27, 2021 6 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said: TLDR. Paragraphs help. Please explain your jargon so a person who doesn't know WTF "1 Rat Coverage (Man Free)" is might understand WTF you're talking about. Also, 49 overran the play Appreciate the advice. The wall of text is absolutely overwhelming. I explain 1 Rat Coverage in a little more detail here (sorry for the wall of text again). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 2 hours ago, eee1776 said: 49 Over ran the play The RB had an easy read. No matter what Edmunds did or didn't do, that was a big gainer. JMO. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 I would say Dane had bad eyes here too. Even though he's following his man, he has to recognize the run and locate the ball. Harris is already coming through the hole as Dane comes across the formation and he is extremely late to react. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 14 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said: TLDR. Paragraphs help. Please explain your jargon so a person who doesn't know WTF "1 Rat Coverage (Man Free)" is might understand WTF you're talking about. Also, 49 overran the play You know, not all of those who visit here are like you and me, the Otters and Storks of this Animal House. 🤨😉😁 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 2 hours ago, eee1776 said: 49 Over ran the play What he didn't do is recognize the potential cut back coming.........and that's a feel/instinct thing. Edmunds doesn't make plays because he lacks to ability to process and anticipate.........he's the embodiment of checker player at MLB. That hokey-pokey he played with the Pats RB in pass pro where the scrub just ran a circle around him allowing feeble Mac to hit him for a first down was another Edmunds gem. If he had the instincts of AJ Klein he'd be an NFLDPOY candidate. 2 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoofHearted Posted December 27, 2021 Author Share Posted December 27, 2021 2 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: I would say Dane had bad eyes here too. Even though he's following his man, he has to recognize the run and locate the ball. Harris is already coming through the hole as Dane comes across the formation and he is extremely late to react. Can't play man without having man eyes - his eyes are on his guy and nowhere else as they should be. With all the RPO game now if he peaks in the backfield he's beat in man coverage. They essentially "ran him off" like when a receiver will just run a vertical to take the DB out of the play. He did what he was suppose to do - the front 7 just has to do their job. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 (edited) 11 minutes ago, HoofHearted said: Appreciate the advice. The wall of text is absolutely overwhelming. I explain 1 Rat Coverage in a little more detail here (sorry for the wall of text again). Knowledgeable people gotta knowledge. You're a nice change from the troglodytes and jokers normally residing here. Signed, Second most egregious joker. Edited December 27, 2021 by Ridgewaycynic2013 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoofHearted Posted December 27, 2021 Author Share Posted December 27, 2021 2 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said: What he didn't do is recognize the potential cut back coming.........and that's a feel/instinct thing. Edmunds doesn't make plays because he lacks to ability to process and anticipate.........he's the embodiment of checker player at MLB. That hokey-pokey he played with the Pats RB in pass pro where the scrub just ran a circle around him allowing feeble Mac to hit him for a first down was another Edmunds gem. If he had the instincts of AJ Klein he'd be an NFLDPOY candidate. If he plays the cutback then there is no cutback, and the play runs as it was designed to. Everyone has a role in run defense. You have a gap assignment on every single call, and if you don't fit your gap or have two guys in one gap you get gashed. Expecting a player to be responsible for two gaps is asinine. 3 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rochesterfan Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 2 hours ago, eee1776 said: 49 Over ran the play 11 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said: TLDR. Paragraphs help. Please explain your jargon so a person who doesn't know WTF "1 Rat Coverage (Man Free)" is might understand WTF you're talking about. Also, 49 overran the play See - this is an issue - watching the actual play Edmund did not overrun the play. He fills his gap with the tackle. The issue is at the snap Johnson is moving to the middle of the field and he runs passed Edmunds - even with the WR coming down to block. The gap that was run through was his gap. When the WR looked to block down - then Dane Jackson playing a tail technique- should have been the fill - he was the unblocked defender led right to the hole by the WR. He recognized it to late and was passed. The front did fine - especially playside, but Phillips held up, but was moved enough to open the backside hole and the 2 CBs in Johnson and Jackson took themselves out of the play. They preach one of 11 and then when the guy covers his hole and allows a cut back - he gets blamed by people that have no idea what they are watching. Yes it would have been great if both Milano and Edmunds attacked that harder and faster and maybe closed down the holes a bit tighter or if Phillips had driven down into his block and not allowed the hole to open. If Edmunds had pursued less and been in the hole Damien eventually went through - a different hole would have been right where Edmunds was and the tackle would of had an easy block on Edmunds and Johnson. 1 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 1 minute ago, HoofHearted said: Can't play man without having man eyes - his eyes are on his guy and nowhere else as they should be. With all the RPO game now if he peaks in the backfield he's beat in man coverage. They essentially "ran him off" like when a receiver will just run a vertical to take the DB out of the play. He did what he was suppose to do - the front 7 just has to do their job. I'm not buying that at all. 1. The defense communicates "run" and sometimes even who has the ball while the play is going on and 2. Harris is in Dane's field of vision as the play unfolds. They have to be communicating effectively and Dane has to be more aware so that he's not so easily taken out of the play. If he has tunnel vision on his man, then he has "bad eyes." The play is in front of him like it is for the safety. A receiver running a vertical that turns a DB's eyes away from the play is totally different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 13 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said: You know, not all of those who visit here are like you and me, the Otters and Storks of this Animal House. 🤨😉😁 What the hell we 'sposed to do, ya MOW-RON? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 I thought edmunds played a solid game. 2 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted December 27, 2021 Share Posted December 27, 2021 22 minutes ago, HoofHearted said: Appreciate the advice. The wall of text is absolutely overwhelming. I explain 1 Rat Coverage in a little more detail here (sorry for the wall of text again). You lost me at 3, 5, 9 technique. Nice try, but I'm at ABC level in my analysis. My Edmunds and Ford reports are See Spot Run, while your breakdown is Ulysses. 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.