Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So sick of fans saying we should get rid of Beasley and keep McKenzie.

 

Here is an idea , keep them both and play them at the same time on some plays.

 

Why get rid of a good player when you can get rid of the worst player on the team, when the offseason comes.

 

And this goes for all positions.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 15
  • Agree 5
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 5
  • Dislike 2
Posted (edited)

I will say this. Whenever McKenzie is a big role in the offense, teams never really have someone to cover him effectively

Edited by cDAVIS
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 1
Posted

Simply put, because they play the same role in offense and next year we’re going to have to make some tough choices due to the cap. 
 

If cap room wasn’t an issue, they’d obviously keep both, despite the fact they rarely see the field together. 

  • Like (+1) 8
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, TOboy said:

Simply put, because they play the same role in offense and next year we’re going to have to make some tough choices due to the cap. 
 

If cap room wasn’t an issue, they’d obviously keep both, despite the fact they rarely see the field together. 

 

So only keep one slot WR, Beasley isnt that expensive.

 

 

Posted

Both are good.

 

It’s staggering to see the weird either or logic of so many fans. 

 

I don’t care about Beasley’s politics. He’s a reliable bawler and is fun to watch. He’s entitled to his opinions. 


 

  • Like (+1) 11
  • Agree 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

So only keep one slot WR, Beasley isnt that expensive.

 

 

He makes $9M, he’s not cheap. Would be great to have the ability to keep both, but at what cost? If it prohibits us getting a pass rusher? Or a solid interior lineman? 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Warcodered said:

Because they fill a similar role so the younger cheaper guy playing well makes the older more expensive one more expendable.

 

Get rid of somebody else, you dont get rid of a pretty good player because another is better after the catch. Beasley has come up big for us and gotten many first downs. Id get rid of Stevenson before Beasley.

 

 

1 minute ago, BILLieve85 said:

Ever hear of Mr. Celery Cap?

 

Yawn

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

So sick of fans saying we should get rid of Beasley and keep McKenzie.

 

Here is an idea , keep them both and play them at the same time on some plays.

 

Why get rid of a good player when you can get rid of the worst player on the team, when the offseason comes.

 

And this goes for all positions.

 

 

💰 💴 💵 

that’s why. 
 

I’m not saying we should or shouldn’t keep Cole, but that’s why people are discussing it

Posted
Just now, TOboy said:

He makes $9M, he’s not cheap. Would be great to have the ability to keep both, but at what cost? If it prohibits us getting a pass rusher? Or a solid interior lineman? 

 

I bet he would take a pay cut knowing he didn't have many options before coming here.

 

 

2 minutes ago, Just in Atlanta said:

Both are good.

 

It’s staggering to see the weird either or logic of so many fans. 

 

I don’t care about Beasley’s politics. He’s a reliable bawler and is fun to watch. He’s entitled to his opinions. 


 

 

Yep, best 53

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

I bet he would take a pay cut knowing he didn't have many options before coming here.

 

 

If he’s willing to take a pay cut, who’s arguing against keeping him?

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

Haha keep going. Also, McKenzie is a FA and Beasley is on the books for like $8 mil. So if we keep both, where do we upgrade. Enough with trying to have pro bowlers at each starting spot. It doesn’t happen

  • Haha (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...