Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Greg S said:

 

Steelers, Broncos, Dolphins, Packers (if Rodgers leaves), 49ers would be my guesses assuming these teams can make it work cap wise.

Mr and Mrs ‘Unlimited’ will want a bigger platform than some of those cities can offer.  My money would be on the Giants.  

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, BuffaloRebound said:

Mr and Mrs ‘Unlimited’ will want a bigger platform than some of those cities can offer.  My money would be on the Giants.  

 

The Giants suck. I think he would want to go to a team that can win. 

Posted
Just now, thenorthremembers said:

The Giants can win with him.   I think you'll see Doug Pederson and Russell Wilson in NY next year.

 

The Giants OL makes the Bills OL look like the Colts OL. 

image.thumb.png.d0591f9d6782ad766364ead40e964a8f.png

Posted

Did anyone see why they played both of these games at 7PM? Would it have gotten better rating had they staggered the start times?

Posted
2 hours ago, BuffaloRebound said:

I’m not sure there was much contact if any at all before the pass hit the defender in the back.  If the RB played the ball better, there would’ve been a lot of contact and the flag should’ve been thrown.  Unless it’s egregious, you’re usually not gonna get the call if the ref doesn’t think you gave yourself a chance to catch the ball.  I think that’s what happened to Diggs against Tampa, but it was probably egregious enough the call.  But Diggs did himself no favors basically giving up on going for the ball.  

 

He practically plowed into the receiver.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

He practically plowed into the receiver.

But it was after the ball hit the defender in the back.  It was a terrible pass and the RB didn’t stop in time to force contact before the ball hit the defender in the back.  Refs have called that PI more often than not, but i have no problem with that no call.  Problem as always is the inconsistency.  

Posted
8 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

But it was after the ball hit the defender in the back.  It was a terrible pass and the RB didn’t stop in time to force contact before the ball hit the defender in the back.  Refs have called that PI more often than not, but i have no problem with that no call.  Problem as always is the inconsistency.  

You might want to rewatch the play. The defender chops at the RBs arms and gets him with the body before the ball gets there. The ball also never hits the defender in the back. It hits the RBs right hand as he's attempting to make the catch. 

Posted
1 hour ago, BuffaloRebound said:

But it was after the ball hit the defender in the back.  It was a terrible pass and the RB didn’t stop in time to force contact before the ball hit the defender in the back.  Refs have called that PI more often than not, but i have no problem with that no call.  Problem as always is the inconsistency.  

Watch it again. The defender got there early

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...