Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
26 minutes ago, Beerball said:

Maybe we watched different games.

 

I think we did because the Pats couldn't move the ball most of the day.  Im sure they weren't content with that.  Had Allen made one more play they lose.

  • Agree 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

I think we did because the Pats couldn't move the ball most of the day.  Im sure they weren't content with that.  Had Allen made one more play they lose.

Interesting opinion, but, no.  Hopefully this time will be different, we'll see.

39 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

Are you saying the Pats could've scored at will?

Nothing of the sort. Are you saying the Bills could've scored at will?

Posted
2 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

 

They were making sure they had Harris ready for us 

 

 

 

Is it just me or have a substantial amount of players missed practice due to "Illness-non COVID" throughout the season? Way more than normal.

Posted
5 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

Of all the things I've seen so far this week this made me feel the best

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, Beerball said:

Interesting opinion, but, no.  Hopefully this time will be different, we'll see.

Nothing of the sort. Are you saying the Bills could've scored at will?


-1, 5, turnover first play, 4, 25, 19, 6

 

those are the yardage totals of every drive they didn’t score on. So 7 out of 10 drives they couldn’t move the football. 
 

It’s not an interesting opinion. It’s a fact. 

Edited by Scott7975
Posted
3 hours ago, Logic said:

If Sanders can't go, I expect the Bills to run a lot of two tight end sets.

When they do go three-wide, I presume Isaiah McKenzie will be the primary beneficiary of Beasley's absence, with Kumerow taking snaps as well.

I don't get the sense that Stevenson is ready to contribute much in the receiving game or that Hodgins -- even if brought up from the practice squad -- what get many offensive snaps.

I expect sanders to get more run than mckenzie.  Not sure if that’s good or bad.  Seems like 17 and 1 are a little out of sync.  
 

I’d love to see a bunch of 2TE sets if Dawkins is out.   Brown will get destroyed again.  Belichick and Judon are going to make him miserable 

Posted
52 minutes ago, NewEra said:

I expect sanders to get more run than mckenzie.  Not sure if that’s good or bad.  Seems like 17 and 1 are a little out of sync.  
 

I’d love to see a bunch of 2TE sets if Dawkins is out.   Brown will get destroyed again.  Belichick and Judon are going to make him miserable 

I don’t like 2 TE sets from the Bills perspective solely because one of them is Sweeney. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, AlCowlingsTaxiService said:

I don’t like 2 TE sets from the Bills perspective solely because one of them is Sweeney. 

Agree.  The drop off from Knox to Sweeney is immense.  This was another head scratching move by McD & Beane. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, AlCowlingsTaxiService said:

I don’t like 2 TE sets from the Bills perspective solely because one of them is Sweeney. 

Yeah, I feel the same about Sweeney but if we don’t chip judon throughout the game, 17 might die with brown @LT

Posted
13 minutes ago, AlCowlingsTaxiService said:

I never thought I would long for those halcyon days of Lee Smith 

Word.  He’d be a much better TE2 compared to Sweeney.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Locomark said:

If the Bills play conservative and play 2 TE sets or 2 WR sets we will be in a tight game just by removing playmakers from the field. Just simply play to our strengths, spread the field, and let Josh make plays, so we can win this game by at least 10. Make this a game like last year where we go into Foxboro and rely on our strengths and stop worrying about what Belicheat may take away. I don’t believe they can match our points with their simple offense and lack of playmakers. Let them run 45 times for 200 yards. 

I think you overestimate our OL

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, ScottLaw said:

Somewhat perplexed at the Dawkins situation…. You’d think he’d have mild or no symptoms at this point after having it over the summer….wondering if he just hasn’t tested negative yet. 

I'm with you.  It would be real interesting to know whether he has had any symptoms.  I mean the guy is fully vaccinated AND he has natural immunity from having had covid previously. 

 

My only question and I hope I don't get put in timeout for raising this, was Dawkins hospitalization a result of a covid infection or a weird reaction between covid and the vaccine?  According to reports he was within a couple of days of having fully completed his vaccine regimen. This means that he got his first shot and then a month later he got his 2nd shot and then was infected about 10 days after the 2nd shot.  Do people really believe that those last couple of days were that critical? You don't think that two weeks after the 2nd shot doesn't contain a little wiggle room?

 

When I was vaccinated I had a terrible reaction to my first shot.  Six months previously I had  gotten the covid and my doctor explained that my bad reaction - I was close to going to the ER - was a result of my previously being infected.  I bring this up only because Dawkins should ave cleared the protocol by now.

 

 

 

 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...