Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, BananaB said:


Yeah I get it, just think it over rated. The game is 60 minutes long, why not start to try getting ahead early instead of hoping for a double possession. All goes back to what I said about no urgency and believing they will always have a shot instead of going for the kill early. 

 

I agree. With this team, take the opening kickoff and let Dabol put together a good script to get us a score and get ahead. Let them try to catch up with us.  

 

I thought the defer thing was more of a road team thing so you get the ball in the 3rd quarter before a lot of the fans get back to their seats. In a loud road game this might make some sense.

 

We want the ball and we're gonna score should be our attitude IMHO.

Edited by reddogblitz
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, mattynh said:

In 1989, who was the GOAT HC?   Who is the coach BB is chasing for all time wins?  Shula was kind of that guy then and he had his franchise QB.  I totally get your point, I dont like the comparisons to those teams though, there is some assumption that to be good you have to mirror the 90's teams.   

For what it's worth, I would have said greatest HC prior to BB was Bill Parcells, or maybe even Bill Walsh who I always thought was a notch smarter than most.

 

Shula definitely would be considered by many to be GOAT...

 

 

Posted (edited)
22 hours ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

Agree with all this but if we get back to being aggressive this year we can make a run this year

 

 

 

That's how I feel. So many are throwing the season away already. Let's see how it unfolds. I don't feel like waiting another off-season when we still have a chance.

Edited by ChronicAndKnuckles
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Nextmanup said:

For what it's worth, I would have said greatest HC prior to BB was Bill Parcells, or maybe even Bill Walsh who I always thought was a notch smarter than most.

 

Shula definitely would be considered by many to be GOAT...

 

 

 

Tom Landry was able to get to 20 straight winning seasons. Bill Bellyache was not.

 

Tom Landry is the greatest coach of all times.

Posted
27 minutes ago, BananaB said:


Yeah I get it, just think it over rated. The game is 60 minutes long, why not start to try getting ahead early instead of hoping for a double possession. All goes back to what I said about no urgency and believing they will always have a shot instead of going for the kill early. 

Of course going for the kill and getting up early is always preferable and I’m fully on board with that. Who wouldn’t be?
 

I’m just saying that the double possession to end a half and begin a half is a unique time element in the game as being ahead by two possessions well into the third quarter can really force teams to start pressing, especially after they’ve sat for the better part of an hour sometimes. Being up two possessions in the first quarter and into the second really doesn’t move the game plan needle and teams can still stick to it. 
 

I agree 100% that there’s a seeming lack of urgency and I mentioned that in my original response as well. 

Posted (edited)

Lombardi and Belichick are the best.   
 

Walsh, Parcells, Landry, Noll and Gibbs are next.

 

I don’t have Shula that high.  Should have won a lot more with the talent he had.  Same with Madden.

 

Love Marv but don’t understand how he made the Hall.  Same with Flores.

 

 

Edited by oldmanfan
Posted
1 minute ago, oldmanfan said:

Lombardi and Belichick are the best.   
 

Walsh, Parcells, Landry, Noll and Gibbs are next.

 

I don’t have Shula that high.  Should have won a lot more with the talent he had.  Same with Madden.

 

Love Marv but don’t understand how he made the Hall.  Same with Flores.

 

 

I agree Marv is overrated as a HC, but I fully understand why he’s in the HOF. He made history in the game and did something no HC had done before and hasn’t done since. That’s hard for HOF voters to ignore. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, K-9 said:

I agree Marv is overrated as a HC, but I fully understand why he’s in the HOF. He made history in the game and did something no HC had done before and hasn’t done since. That’s hard for HOF voters to ignore. 

Agree, but I’d add that Marv was very good at a skill that is very under-rated—capably managing the personalities that comprise an entire NFL squad, many of who are borderline psychos.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
12 minutes ago, K-9 said:

Of course going for the kill and getting up early is always preferable and I’m fully on board with that. Who wouldn’t be?
 

I’m just saying that the double possession to end a half and begin a half is a unique time element in the game as being ahead by two possessions well into the third quarter can really force teams to start pressing, especially after they’ve sat for the better part of an hour sometimes. Being up two possessions in the first quarter and into the second really doesn’t move the game plan needle and teams can still stick to it. 
 

I agree 100% that there’s a seeming lack of urgency and I mentioned that in my original response as well. 

There is no guarantee we are gonna have the last possession before half anyway, it just seems to be something this team is banking on it to get ahead. 

Posted
8 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

The problem isn’t bickering. The team’s  problem is apathy. 

 

I don’t think the problem is bickering, but I also don’t think the problem is apathy. What is that based upon? Them’s fightin’ words! I wouldn’t dare ask them in person if the problem was apathy. Poyer and Hyde also don’t like to be asked if they were embarrassed. THAT didn’t go well. They care, I’m as sure as I can be from where I sit.

 

The problem is mostly, IMO, lack of talent and execution on the OLine. Better execution there and we are comfortably ahead in four of our five losses and don’t run the risk of losing the close games. It can be corrected in time, but requires adjustments to the personnel and likely the coaching.  

  • Agree 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, BananaB said:

There is no guarantee we are gonna have the last possession before half anyway, it just seems to be something this team is banking on it to get ahead. 

Of course there’s no guarantee. But when the opportunity presents itself, it makes sense to take advantage. I can’t agree that the team is hinging it’s strategy on it though. The idea is to score on every possession, regardless; from your first possession and until you need to start milking the clock if you’re in a position to do so. 

Posted
1 hour ago, dave mcbride said:

Agree, but I’d add that Marv was very good at a skill that is very under-rated—capably managing the personalities that comprise an entire NFL squad, many of who are borderline psychos.

That’s so true and I appreciate Marv’s ability for in that regard but I take managing personalities at par for HCs and I don’t think it would be one of my criteria if I were a HOF voter. Marv’s record pretty much tells the story of his ability to manage people. 

Posted
1 hour ago, K-9 said:

I agree Marv is overrated as a HC, but I fully understand why he’s in the HOF. He made history in the game and did something no HC had done before and hasn’t done since. That’s hard for HOF voters to ignore. 

 

Marv had to manage the super egos of that team , that team would have imploded without him, that makes him a HOFer just for that.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Last season this team played loose and with confidence, none more so than Allen. This year, especially since the KC game, they look tight and unsure of themselves. 

 

They look like a team that's constantly second guessing themselves and their decisions and it's killed them so far. There's a lot to be said for mojo and this team has none right now. An impressive win against the Bucs might help change that, a win against Tampa followed by revenge against NE would definitely do it but I really don't see us winning tomorrow. 

 

Hope I'm wrong

Posted
10 hours ago, Ray Stonada said:

I was texting last night with one of my best friends, a lifelong Bills fan like me. In high school we went to the 51-3 AFC championship game and about 20 other games together (paying our own money cause we didn't have parents with season tickets). We live a couple thousand miles apart now, 30 years later, but we text every week leading up to games. Last night, we were both predictably frustrated about the coaching and play-calling and we agreed McD seems to have a real knack for making the wrong call on fourth downs and challenges.

 

But we were both worried about something more difficult to define: the feeling of team unity.

 

There seems to be a weird Bickering Bills feeling floating around, like the team isn’t fighting as one. We remembered the 1989 season well and how there was a sense that Jim Kelly throwing Howard Ballard under the bus broke the team's unity back then. It took Thuman Thomas calling him out and the two of them getting over it to bring the team back together. (By the way, for my money Thurman was the MVP of the 90s teams.)

 

Back to this season: when one of our guys makes a dumb mistake, penalty or whatever, I don’t have the feeling that they feel bad they let the team down. It's like they’re not playing for each other the same as last year. As my friend said, last year's team had that good feeling and this year's doesn't.

 

Did the vaccine issue drive a serious wedge into the team? Is the disappointment of the season slowly breaking them down? I rewatched the Kansas City game last night and the Bills looked totally together, and McDermott looked like a different coach: cool, calm and collected. (Also worth noting, for those who think we need to pass 60 times tomorrow night: the Bills put a stamp on that KC game with a TD on our first drive using three called Josh Allen runs, and a couple of runs with our backs, which then set up the deep passes to Sanders, Diggs and Knox later.) 

 

Flash forward to the Pats game and McDermott looks like he's losing it, meanwhile players (like Knox) are making mistakes left and right, they're fumbling handoffs, the whole team just has a sense of malaise around it. The player's efforts don't seem to add up.

 

So the question is, why has a team that seemed like they were on a mission together the last two seasons suddenly unable to win close games, make clutch plays when we need them, and get out of their own way? Why can't they elevate when the chips are down? What happened to their team spirit?

 

 

Its like they put everything into beating KC and now they just cant seem to get back to that level.

 

 

5 minutes ago, RobbRiddick said:

Last season this team played loose and with confidence, none more so than Allen. This year, especially since the KC game, they look tight and unsure of themselves. 

 

They look like a team that's constantly second guessing themselves and their decisions and it's killed them so far. There's a lot to be said for mojo and this team has none right now. An impressive win against the Bucs might help change that, a win against Tampa followed by revenge against NE would definitely do it but I really don't see us winning tomorrow. 

 

Hope I'm wrong

 

I got the  same feeling

 

 

10 hours ago, Johnnycage46 said:

I think the team spirit is fine.  The fans are $%!@#$@#.

 

But it smells like Teen spirit 😉😉

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Tom Landry was able to get to 20 straight winning seasons. Bill Bellyache was not.

 

Tom Landry is the greatest coach of all times.

😳 Landry was a great coach.  
 

BB did it 19 straight years.  That one season weighs more than 3x the championships?  6-2.  
 

You’re certainly entitled to your opinion, but I disagree.  
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, ProcessTruster said:

exactly.  the team was onto the next game 3 days ago.  fans are still peeing in their beer

 

Tastes the same

 

 

9 hours ago, Evian said:

I still HONESTLY think the Bills are winning the Supebowl. I don't see why they can't. The Colts game was terrible,  but every team has a head scratching game this year. Every other loss was winnable. 

 

The Bills are just a little bit off. I think the Bills can win this weekend but it will not matter. The Bills at Pats game will determine everything for me. If they go to New England and win I don't think they will lose again. I think they win out and head to the playoffs like an unstoppable train.

 

I hope you're right.

 

These next two games will make or break this team.

 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

Expectations... I think the players are beating themselves up trying to live up to them and may be coming across as lacking unity.  I believe they all are just uptight right now. Just need to loosen up a little and I think a win against the Bucs could do that. I do think that Mommy and Daddy are having issues right now (McDermott and Daboll) and when that happens the kids suffer (team). I don't think McDermott and Daboll are on the same page and until that gets resolved, we could be heading down a rough road.

 

Team unity will be fine, coaching staff probably not so much.

 

They need to be in attack mode all the time or i don't see it happening this year

 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, FireChans said:

The Bills are not playing well.

 

TBD, everytime: IS THIS LIKE THE BICKERING BILLS AND 1989 VIBES???????????????

 

The answer is no. It’s not.

 

The comparison isnt about the locker rooms of these teams.

 

The comparison is we had a great record in 88 and high expectations for 89, same with this season as compared to last.

 

 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...