njbuff Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Albwan said: ...another gay post brought to you by the libtards. That’s because they’re all a bunch of flaming homos, whose opinions mean NOTHING right now. And they are mad because they’re all being exposed as the whiny little sissy wimp p@ssies that they are. 1
wnyguy Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 3 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: Why on earth would you act like this is a good thing? "Grovels to Trump," who in turn grovels to Putin (the poor guy was very hurt by being implicated in Russia gate!), which means the world grovels to Putin. And that's good in your book. Why would President Trump give Ukraine javelin missiles to use against Russian troops if he was Putins stooge? Why would he, until recently, keep the supplies flowing to Ukraine if Putin is pulling his strings? Think about what you're saying for a second and realize your opinion makes little sense. 1
dgrochester55 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 18 hours ago, Roundybout said: Then take them back. They are not his. The US and EU continues to fund Ukrainian resistance. Give them whatever they like. Whatever it takes. Honesty, think about what that looks like. Best case, Ukraine runs out of men and Russia takes more land. Worst case, the EU and US get involved and we are looking at WW3. Is that what you are willing to sacrifice? Even some of the regular lefty posters realize this. There has to be a path to peace.
Homelander Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 7 minutes ago, dgrochester55 said: There has to be a path to peace. History has shown us that appeasing dictators by giving them land never works; it just kicks the can down the road.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 23 minutes ago, Homelander said: History has shown us that appeasing dictators by giving them land never works; it just kicks the can down the road. So then ww3?
The Frankish Reich Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 25 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: So then ww3? Question: is World War III (defined as an all-out war between the United States and its allies vs. Russia and its allies, with China somehow involved more likely under: A. A continuation of the U.S. support of Ukraine in its efforts to repel Russia's invasion, a situation that has resulted in an ongoing war in Ukraine but which has not been accompanied by further Russian expansionist actions in Europe. B. A peace deal with Russia that allows Russia to keep all the territory it seized through its invasions of 2014 and 2022, without providing additional assurances to Ukraine that Russia will not be allowed to take further military action in Ukraine. The answer is obvious. 1
Big Blitz Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Obvious. . Crickets from the Team Covid I mean Ukraine
Roundybout Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago 3 hours ago, njbuff said: That’s because they’re all a bunch of flaming homos, whose opinions mean NOTHING right now. And they are mad because they’re all being exposed as the whiny little sissy wimp p@ssies that they are. You seem like a very stable fellow
The Frankish Reich Posted 13 minutes ago Posted 13 minutes ago 4 hours ago, njbuff said: That’s because they’re all a bunch of flaming homos, whose opinions mean NOTHING right now. And they are mad because they’re all being exposed as the whiny little sissy wimp p@ssies that they are. The warped world MAGA lives in, where the president of a David-sized nation who refuses to give in to Goliath is a whiny little sissy, and the president of the United States who wants to surrender immediately is a tough guy.
Recommended Posts