Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 23 Posted January 23 (edited) Just now, sherpa said: Nobody knows what Putin would have done if Trump was pres. We do know what he did with Biden. We also know how this Biden regime abandoned Afghanistan. I believe dealing with Iranian subcontractors active in Yemen would have been different, if only in the immediacy of the response. we know that putin helped trump win from oft quoted Mueller (by MAGAs- they like to ignore this part). why do u surmise he did that? Edited January 23 by Joe Ferguson forever
Doc Posted January 23 Posted January 23 30 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: other than ***** with Ukraine’s weapons? Other than sending out everyone so that he can private conversations with Putin that go against protocol How did he ***** with Ukraine's weapons? Not that they needed them under him. And what did these alleged "private conversations" do for Putin?
John from Riverside Posted January 23 Posted January 23 2 minutes ago, Doc said: How did he ***** with Ukraine's weapons? Not that they needed them under him. And what did these alleged "private conversations" do for Putin? Thank you for missing the entire point
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 23 Posted January 23 (edited) Just now, Doc said: And what did these alleged "private conversations" do for Putin? they were planned and orchestrated. for a reason. what do you think it was? comparing mcdonalds to borsch? Edited January 23 by Joe Ferguson forever
Doc Posted January 23 Posted January 23 Just now, John from Riverside said: Thank you for missing the entire point There was no point, John. Trump gave Putin nothing. Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said: they were planned and orchestrated. for a reason. what do you think it was? Nothing. Because again, Trump gave Putin nothing. 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 23 Posted January 23 Just now, Doc said: Nothing sure. because an unprecedented event has no reason...
Doc Posted January 23 Posted January 23 7 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: sure. because an unprecedented event has no reason... To what "unprecedented event" are you referring?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 23 Posted January 23 (edited) Just now, Doc said: To what "unprecedented event" are you referring? private conversations without transcripts between enemy leaders. ya think roosevelt and hitler met at a summit and had such a meeting? Edited January 23 by Joe Ferguson forever
Tommy Callahan Posted January 23 Posted January 23 But the mongers done care. Their pockets are getting fatter
All_Pro_Bills Posted January 23 Posted January 23 (edited) 11 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: private conversations without transcripts between enemy leaders. ya think roosevelt and hitler met at a summit and had such a meeting? Chamberlain met with Hitler. Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin met at Yalta after WW2 (curiously in Crimea which was part of Russia). Are there transcripts from those? Edited January 23 by All_Pro_Bills
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 23 Posted January 23 (edited) 13 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Chamberlain met with Hitler. Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin met at Yalta after WW2 (curiously in Crimea which was part of Russia). Are there transcripts from those? there were other diplomats present. Chamberlain was a Nazi sympathizer. Roosevelt and Churchill represented different countries and therefore had different interests. The presence of both together with Stalin insured transparency. We know the results of Yalta. We know the terrible results of Munich. We have no idea of the results of secret Putin/orange man meeting. i thought you were smarter than this. Defending this meeting is ridiculous. https://www.britannica.com/event/Munich-Agreement https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yalta_Conference Gee look all pro, one was called a conference and the other an agreement between multiple countries. Edited January 23 by Joe Ferguson forever 1 1
Tommy Callahan Posted January 23 Posted January 23 Feds worried way more about Ukraine border than ours
wnyguy Posted January 23 Posted January 23 3 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said: But the mongers done care. Their pockets are getting fatter Whatta you? Ricky Ricardo all of a sudden? 1
Tommy Callahan Posted January 23 Posted January 23 3 minutes ago, wnyguy said: Whatta you? Ricky Ricardo all of a sudden? You done made me Google who Ricky richardo is. Lol 1
Tiberius Posted January 23 Author Posted January 23 4 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Chamberlain met with Hitler. Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin met at Yalta after WW2 (curiously in Crimea which was part of Russia). Are there transcripts from those? Chamberlerlain met with Hiter, yes. Appeasement followed. How'd that turn out? Evil will lose. It might take time, but evil will lose 1
Tommy Callahan Posted January 23 Posted January 23 Just now, Tiberius said: Damn. Modern Lefties sound like the old GOP war hawks. Same exact false narrative. Lockheed, Honeywell, Siemens, Johnson controls, and that military stock you own, thank you for the advertisement. SMH 1 1
Doc Posted January 23 Posted January 23 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Chamberlerlain met with Hiter, yes. Appeasement followed. How'd that turn out? Evil will lose. It might take time, but evil will lose Ah Adam showing what a fraud he was. It's funny they used him and then redistricted him out of a job. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 23 Posted January 23 3 minutes ago, Doc said: Ah Adam showing what a fraud he was. It's funny they used him and then redistricted him out of a job. neither funny nor unexpected. fascists will do what they do. 38 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Damn. Modern Lefties sound like the old GOP war hawks. Same exact false narrative. Lockheed, Honeywell, Siemens, Johnson controls, and that military stock you own, thank you for the advertisement. SMH poor you. those companies are part of the corporate bedrock of the US economy, you fool. 1
Doc Posted January 23 Posted January 23 5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: neither funny nor unexpected. fascists will do what they do. LOL! Yes the Dem fascists played Adam like the fool he is. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 23 Posted January 23 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Doc said: LOL! Yes the Dem fascists played Adam like the fool he is. it wasn't that funny. Adam is a decent man with honorable intentions who outgrew the ethics of what has become the R party. It really needs to be renamed. R's from my father's days wouldn't recognize it. They've even redefined "conservative" to include radicals like you that would engage in a shooting civil war. Edited January 23 by Joe Ferguson forever 1
Recommended Posts