L Ron Burgundy Posted January 14 Posted January 14 Shocked. https://www.stopfake.org/en/fake-ukraine-arrests-and-tortures-american-blogger-gonzalo-lira-for-criticizing-zelenskyi/
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 14 Posted January 14 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: Someone quoted the King recently and I was able to read its ridiculous claim that it doesn't watch the news... Where oh where would the King have learned the persistent left wing media retort of ....you're just parroting Putin. So original and fresh from the King's masters. Yes because claims like Zelensky is a Nazi don't stem from Russia. Just about everything negative in this thread has started from Russia. The balls on you to call anyone king. The guy that laughs at Q jokes while constantly quoting known Q goofballs. Sure buddy. 1 1
ChiGoose Posted January 15 Posted January 15 8 hours ago, Doc said: "Parroting Russian talking points"? LMAO! Show me where? You already admitted that you believed that Russia invaded Ukraine because they didn't want it to join NATO. Russia invaded Ukraine for the same reason it invaded other former Soviet republics. It wants to re-establish it's former "glory". 1
Pokebball Posted January 15 Posted January 15 55 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: You already admitted that you believed that Russia invaded Ukraine because they didn't want it to join NATO. Russia invaded Ukraine for the same reason it invaded other former Soviet republics. It wants to re-establish it's former "glory". Both can be true 1 1
Tommy Callahan Posted January 15 Posted January 15 11 hours ago, Pokebball said: Both can be true And both can also be secondary to the huge energy reserves and pipeline/shipping that goes through Crimea to feed the EU. the energy thats a huge part of the Russian economy and how they have a stronghold over the EU. IE, it's about the money.... Especially since the Nord Stream attack. But glory and Nato are also valid reasons. 2
PetermansRedemption Posted January 15 Posted January 15 4 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said: US funding dries up and only 2 weeks later he is talking about peace. 1 1
Tiberius Posted January 16 Author Posted January 16 16 hours ago, PetermansRedemption said: US funding dries up and only 2 weeks later he is talking about peace. Funding will be a going again soon. Europe still sending help and we will again be soon You really want the fascist Putin to win, huh? You should go live in Russia 1
Tommy Callahan Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) Boy that. "100% support nonstop war equipment and money to Ukraine with no accounting, or you're a Russian supporter." MORONIC false dichotomy never gets old. except for the very low IQ trolls that keep thinking it's a valid reply. Edited January 16 by Tommy Callahan 1
Doc Posted January 16 Posted January 16 6 hours ago, Tiberius said: Funding will be a going again soon. Europe still sending help and we will again be soon You really want the fascist Putin to win, huh? You should go live in Russia Good, let Europe take care of it. I think that's fine with all of us. 2
Tiberius Posted January 17 Author Posted January 17 15 hours ago, Doc said: Good, let Europe take care of it. I think that's fine with all of us. No, we are going to help. We will help defeat the terrorist Putin You think the murderous, child stealing, civilian bombing Putin is an evil that needs to be stood up to? Or do you want to abandon Ukraine because Putin wants to help Trump win in November? 1
Doc Posted January 18 Posted January 18 12 hours ago, Tiberius said: No, we are going to help. We will help defeat the terrorist Putin You think the murderous, child stealing, civilian bombing Putin is an evil that needs to be stood up to? Or do you want to abandon Ukraine because Putin wants to help Trump win in November? Putin wouldn't have invaded if Trump had still been President. And you know it.
Tiberius Posted January 18 Author Posted January 18 12 hours ago, Doc said: Putin wouldn't have invaded if Trump had still been President. And you know it. Why do you say that?
All_Pro_Bills Posted January 18 Posted January 18 38 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Why do you say that? A better question is why didn't Putin invade during Trump's term given the belief many hold that Trump was beholden to Putin?
Tiberius Posted January 18 Author Posted January 18 10 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: A better question is why didn't Putin invade during Trump's term given the belief many hold that Trump was beholden to Putin? Really doesn't matter. He did invade. We shall do all we can to make sure he fails
All_Pro_Bills Posted January 18 Posted January 18 15 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Really doesn't matter. He did invade. We shall do all we can to make sure he fails I suggest it does matter because the lack of a logical explanation invalidates the ongoing conspiracy theory that Trump has some mutually beneficial quid pro quo arrangement with Putin.
Recommended Posts