Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
53 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

They're capable but the talent gap between White and Wallace/Jackson is significant.  There's no sugar coating it.  It's a huge loss.  Our defense will take a step back so we need Josh and the offense to take it to another level.


I don’t disagree, losing Tre would be a big loss.  But the season isn’t over if so.  Most the people in this thread have literally said the season is done if we lose Tre.  It most certainly is not.  
 

Not to mention, we don’t even know if Tre is lost for the season yet.

Posted
1 hour ago, John from Riverside said:

Everyone’s gonna be holding their breath on this one until we know for sure

 

I'm not. It's pretty obvious what it is, and Tre knew by his reaction of slamming his helmet down and looking distraught and like he had tears in his eyes.

 

Going to be rough to replace that.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson said:

Tre being out could be a blessing in disguise. Bills D may get more interceptions because QBs will be throwing the ball more where Tre used to defend.

You might want to walk back this statement. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
46 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

You might want to walk back this statement. 

Nope. I'm actually going to double down. This Bills defense will actually get better if or when Tre is out the rest of the year. Tre wasn't exaclty playing lights out against the Titans & Colts when  they scored a lot of points on us.

Edited by Joe Ferguson
  • Shocked 1
  • Disagree 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson said:

Nope. I'm actually going to double down. This Bills defense will actually get better if or when Tre is out the rest of the year. Tre wasn't exaclty playing lights out against the Texans & Colts when  they scored a lot of points on us.

 

You're a bold man, Ferguson.

Posted
45 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson said:

Tre being out could be a blessing in disguise. Bills D may get more interceptions because QBs will be throwing the ball more where Tre used to defend.

QB's throwing to their #1 WR's more.  How in god's name is that a blessing in disguise?

 

Just now, Joe Ferguson said:

Nope. I'm actually going to double down. This Bills defense will actually get better if or when Tre is out the rest of the year. Tre wasn't exaclty playing lights out against the Texans & Colts when  they scored a lot of points on us.

We shut out the Texans and Carson Wentz threw for 106 yards.

Posted
1 hour ago, Buffalo619 said:

Just from watching it. He walked off. I’m no doctor but didn’t look too bad. 

 

You can walk off a lot of really bad injuries, doesn't mean it is a bad injury just means that simply walking it off isn't an indicator of much either way.

Posted
4 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

Lachman test is holding lower leg below knee stable while pulling up( front wards toward the examiner ) on the upper leg above the knee. The ACL’s job is to keep the femur ( thigh ) from sliding forward relative to the knee ( Lower leg) Having done the test hundreds of times , you can tell how loose , or how much give there is as the femur slides forward.  It normally has very little if any “ give” .   It helps to also compare to the other knee.  I agree with the dr tho, you usually only do it acutely like that on the field to test for ACL laxity BEFORE SWELLING AND MUSCLE SPASMS  set in the longer time goes after the initial injury.  The fact the trainer or dr is checking it means they are concerned he tore the acl.  Spraining it is best scenario , but it looked like he felt a sudden, severe pain , unlike anything he felt before ( sprains are bad but tearing the acl is usually more severe , and he looked like he felt it pop ).   If the acl tears, there is usually more swelling acutely as it bleeds and the joint capsule fills with blood.  That’s why you usually wait a couple of days before doing an mri because the fluid / blood/ swelling makes it difficult to read. If they are able to get an mri tomorrow, while not absolute fact, it might be a good sign because of less swelling , but every person does not swell or bleed to the same extent. 
 

ThAt dr has been very accurate any time I have read his analysis,  so sadly, a torn acl seems likely , which will even carry over to next year given the time it takes to heal and then get back to feeling confident using the leg normally  Especially tough for a corner who has to put extreme sudden forces of deceleration that stresses the acl. Cutting, change of direction, suddenly stopping, jumping , all put stress on the acl. Selfishly I hate not having him there against the pats.  It’s a critical position, and he is one of our top 5 players.  Corners are on an island so how do you mask that drop off in talent? You know Belicheck is going to target whomever replaces Tre whenever they can plus they use doubke TE’e , right, and Tre was good  at picking up a TE when needed.    Hope for the best , but beating them just got a little harder.  That QB ( funny , from Jacksonville where I am pretty sure he went to a top prep school, Bolles) has one good talent, accuracy!  Having a different CB , will give Jones a little more of a throwing window , so that’s not easy to write off how important tres status is.  Fingers crossed, nice win tonight., but could be at a heavy cost. Should know by Monday , maybe earlier if swelling stays down. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson said:

Tre being out could be a blessing in disguise. Bills D may get more interceptions because QBs will be throwing the ball more where Tre used to defend.

Seriously? Losing your All Pro CB a blessing? Now your #1 CB is an undrafted FA that gets abused by the more physical WRs in the league. I like Wallace, but not as my #1. This is where the lack of acquiring a decent CB before the season really hurts. After watching Dane Jackson get roasted on a double move in Jax on what would've been an ez walk in TD if Lawrence didn't over throw it, I shudder to think what our passing D on the edges will look like. Fingers crossed Tre is ok. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson said:

Nope. I'm actually going to double down. This Bills defense will actually get better if or when Tre is out the rest of the year. Tre wasn't exaclty playing lights out against the Titans & Colts when  they scored a lot of points on us.

……………………….

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, GoBills808 said:

I walked off both my ACLs

 

in fact the second one I kept playing for 10mins until the swelling got too bad

 

Yep when I was coaching soccer I saw one of my players do his right in front of the dugout in a semi final and I heard the really distinctive "pop" and he was livid that I substituted him he was insisting it was just a sprain he could run off. I told him I was 99% certain he had done his ACL and by the time the games finished it had ballooned and his scan on the Monday confirmed. 

3 hours ago, Rico said:

Hoping for the best, but I don’t see this as a season-breaker if Tre’s gone. McD and Frazier just have to adjust accordingly.

 

I am afraid I do. Two reasons - 1 our scheme has Tre's ability to take away half of the field built in; and 2 I don't think our outside corner depth is good. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Joe Ferguson said:

Tre being out could be a blessing in disguise. Bills D may get more interceptions because QBs will be throwing the ball more where Tre used to defend.

wrong

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 4
Posted
3 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:


I don’t disagree, losing Tre would be a big loss.  But the season isn’t over if so.  Most the people in this thread have literally said the season is done if we lose Tre.  It most certainly is not.  
 

Not to mention, we don’t even know if Tre is lost for the season yet.

 

I believe any hope of a Superbowl this year would be done. Can the Bill still make the playoffs? Sure 3-3 down the stretch might even do that, but losing Tre means we have to change what we are doing in the secondary. It means you can't shade safeties to Levi and bait teams to take the short completion on that side if the field so much, you will have to do more shell coverage and so less rotating of the safeties, I just think it forces our coverage schemes to be more vanilla and we saw last year that when the Bills are forced to be vanilla on the backend (last year it was largely cos we were bad on 1st and 2nd down and so were defending a lot of third and shorts) it makes the defense much simpler for Quarterbacks to dissect. Other than Josh there is no other player whose loss hurts us more IMO. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 4
Posted
4 hours ago, Buffalo619 said:

Just from watching it. He walked off. I’m no doctor but didn’t look too bad. 

Tore both of my acl, walked off field both times. Does not mean anything 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...