Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

The hype of a 6th round draft pick reminds me of the Jauron days….

Just for perspective

 

Tyreek Hill

No. 10 – Kansas City Chiefs

College:West Alabama

NFL Draft:2016 / Round: 5 / Pick: 165

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
3 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

Similar to Newton with the Panthers…. Dude carried that offense as well…. The regime is too defense centric, it’s been the concern since McDs first year here and it’s reared it’s head again. 

Enh ... that 2013 team that went 12-4 and established them as a real power had a bunch of first rounders on offense: Greg Olsen, both running backs (Jonathan Stewart and DeAngelo Williams) and Jordan Gross. Plus they had a superstar receiver who retrospectively would have been a top 15 pick if there was a do-over draft (similar to Diggs): Steve Smith. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said:

Who would even be running the ball for them in this case? 

Some guy I never heard of but just claimed in fantasy 

 

sorry Bills D - prove me wrong! 😜

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said:

Some guy I never heard of but just claimed in fantasy 

 

sorry Bills D - prove me wrong! 😜

I'm sure you're not alone. Saints RB probably has gotten popular in fantasy recently

Posted
2 minutes ago, DapperCam said:

Kind of feel like we’re going to smoke these guys. It may all be fools gold though.

This team needs to find a way to win this game. Just to gain a reset for 11 days. Sitting with another loss for that time would be unbelievable torture and the season will be over before December. Which would absolutely be inexcusable 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Some guy I never heard of but just claimed in fantasy 

 

sorry Bills D - prove me wrong! 😜

thats sorta what i was getting at. lolol.... i own kamara and ingram in 2 leagues.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

This team needs to find a way to win this game. Just to gain a reset for 11 days. Sitting with another loss for that time would be unbelievable torture and the season will be over before December. Which would absolutely be inexcusable 


Yep. Just find a way.

Star and Brown are out? Don't care.

We're likely facing a team with Trevor Siemian at QB, no discernable threat at running back, and a defense that has been getting burned early and often the past few weeks. No excuses.

Beat the Saints, get some key guys back for the Patriots game, and go win a primetime game at home, and we're back in business at 8-4 and with a division lead.

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Agree 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, Logic said:


Yep. Just find a way.

Star and Brown are out? Don't care.

We're likely facing a team with Trevor Siemian at QB, no discernable threat at running back, and a defense that has been getting burned early and often the past few weeks. No excuses.

Beat the Saints, get some key guys back for the Patriots game, and go win a primetime game at home, and we're back in business at 8-4 and with a division lead.

Given the injury situation for the two teams, the Bills have no business losing this game. I did not expect to beat the Colts, and I can be overly pessimistic in the run-up to games, but I think they win this one with ease if they take care of the football.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
6 hours ago, SWATeam said:

IMO, offense is more of the issue.  Our D is built to be elite at defending the pass to compliment our explosive offense that should have teams chasing points.  When our O is not working, it allows teams to be content pounding us on the ground.

 

The Colts were going to try to pound us on the ground no matter what happened.  And if what you say is true then how did we lose to TN?  This was a game our offense went up and down the field and scored 31 points.  Yet the defense could not protect multiple Buffalo leads in that game.

 

BTW, if our D is built for defending the pass as teams try to catch up why did we not take the ball to start the game Sunday? It seems to me that if we got up 7 - 0 and then stopped the Cots and stretched the lead to 10 or even 14 - 0 then we might have forced Wentz into an error as the Colts tried to catch up.

  • Like (+1) 7
  • Agree 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, DapperCam said:

Kind of feel like we’re going to smoke these guys. It may all be fools gold though.

Don't feel that way.  It has proven to be very disappointing time and time again.

  • Agree 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

The Colts were going to try to pound us on the ground no matter what happened.  And if what you say is true then how did we lose to TN?  This was a game our offense went up and down the field and scored 31 points.  Yet the defense could not protect multiple Buffalo leads in that game.

 

BTW, if our D is built for defending the pass as teams try to catch up why did we not take the ball to start the game Sunday? It seems to me that if we got up 7 - 0 and then stopped the Cots and stretched the lead to 10 or even 14 - 0 then we might have forced Wentz into an error as the Colts tried to catch up.

I think that's a great point and we should do that.  Teams get so caught up on the concept of the "double dip", but we would benefit more from trying to dictate game play from the start- like in the scenario you laid out.

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...