Scraps Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 (edited) 3 hours ago, B-Man said: DEBATE OVER. The description says its the Georgia election board, the chyron says it is the Trump Legal Team. Trump's legal team lies repeatedly. Edited August 1 by Scraps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Buffalo Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 7 hours ago, Scraps said: The description says its the Georgia election board, the chyron says it is the Trump Legal Team. Trump's legal team lies repeatedly. So how about we act like adults and simply ask for ID at the ballot box? Then Trump has to STFU about fraud. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 14 Share Posted August 14 ALL THE BEST PEOPLE TOLD ME THIS NEVER HAPPENS: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scraps Posted August 14 Share Posted August 14 20 hours ago, B-Man said: ALL THE BEST PEOPLE TOLD ME THIS NEVER HAPPENS: Nowhere did the DA say he was rigging and election against Republicans. In fact, she said just the opposite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted August 15 Share Posted August 15 14 hours ago, Scraps said: Nowhere did the DA say he was rigging and election against Republicans. In fact, she said just the opposite. Exactly. Never assume that @B-Man has watched/read the news that his Twitter monkeys push out to him with misleading headlines. The case is about this election worker failing to disclose that he had another job at the same time, and that he neglected his duty to make sure that election ballot paper was properly distributed to Harris County precincts. Not exactly the exciting news promised by the tweet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 8 Share Posted September 8 Illegal Alien Arrested for Voting In U.S. Elections Sarah Arnold The Biden Department of Justice (DOJ) arrested an illegal immigrant from Guatemala for impersonating Americans and voting in federal elections. 42-year-old Angelica Maria Francisco was taken into custody after it was revealed she had been illegally voting in both the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. She was charged with “false claims of citizenship in connection with voting, false statements in application for a United States passport, use of a United States passport obtained by false statements, and aggravated identity theft.” https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2024/09/08/illegal-alien-arrested-for-voting-in-us-elections-n2644461 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scraps Posted September 9 Share Posted September 9 18 hours ago, B-Man said: Illegal Alien Arrested for Voting In U.S. Elections Sarah Arnold The Biden Department of Justice (DOJ) arrested an illegal immigrant from Guatemala for impersonating Americans and voting in federal elections. 42-year-old Angelica Maria Francisco was taken into custody after it was revealed she had been illegally voting in both the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. She was charged with “false claims of citizenship in connection with voting, false statements in application for a United States passport, use of a United States passport obtained by false statements, and aggravated identity theft.” https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2024/09/08/illegal-alien-arrested-for-voting-in-us-elections-n2644461 Wait a minute here. I thought Biden and the Dems wanted illegals to vote in elections. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 9 Share Posted September 9 6 minutes ago, Scraps said: I thought that they didn't vote, that is the Left's line, Meanwhile: Voter Fraud? What Voter Fraud? By John Hinderaker FTA: How many illegal ballots are cast in every election cycle? No one knows. Liberals assure us that the number is close to zero. But how could we know that? The hallmark of a successful fraud is that it is not discovered. And in most places, little effort is made to detect voter fraud, even when that is possible. Nevertheless, there are a large number of successful prosecutions of illegal voters. What do Americans think about voter fraud? They are against it. Even many Democrats. {snip} What is more interesting is the consensus in favor of ballot security. Thirty-six percent say Minnesota makes it too easy to vote, while only 1% say it is too hard. What exactly would voters like to see? Eighty-one percent support requiring identification to vote; 68% “strongly support” that measure, which Congressional Democrats tried to make illegal (unconstitutionally so) in all 50 states, just a few years ago. Like many other states, Minnesota has replaced Election Day with Election Autumn. Early voting begins on September 20, a solid 6 1/2 weeks before Election Autumn concludes. This isn’t by popular demand: 17% of Minnesotans want no early voting at all, while 77% want three weeks or less. Minnesota is the only state that allows same-day registration but does not have provisional ballots. In Minnesota, you can show up at the polls without evidence that you are a legal voter who resides in the precinct, and, if vouched for by a partisan representative stationed at the polling place, feed a ballot into the machine. Supposedly the county will follow up to see whether you are actually a qualified voter, but in the meantime, your ballot has been counted and there is no taking it back. Again, this is not what voters want: by 59% to 39%, Minnesotans say they want provisional ballots. Normally, when a political party sees that an issue is overwhelmingly popular–start with voter ID, at 81% support, and go down the line–they get behind it. Why wouldn’t Minnesota’s Democrats (or Democrats in any other state) get on the bandwagon? For some reason, Democrats in every state fight all efforts to improve ballot security tooth and nail, no matter how much public support those measures have. How can we explain such seemingly perverse behavior? I think the only reasonable interpretation is that Democrats consider voter fraud an important part of their electoral strategy, and therefore are determined to stymie any attempt to prevent it. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/09/voter-fraud-what-voter-fraud.php 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 9 Share Posted September 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scraps Posted September 9 Share Posted September 9 1 hour ago, B-Man said: I thought that they didn't vote, that is the Left's line, Meanwhile: Voter Fraud? What Voter Fraud? By John Hinderaker FTA: How many illegal ballots are cast in every election cycle? No one knows. Liberals assure us that the number is close to zero. But how could we know that? The hallmark of a successful fraud is that it is not discovered. And in most places, little effort is made to detect voter fraud, even when that is possible. Nevertheless, there are a large number of successful prosecutions of illegal voters. What do Americans think about voter fraud? They are against it. Even many Democrats. {snip} What is more interesting is the consensus in favor of ballot security. Thirty-six percent say Minnesota makes it too easy to vote, while only 1% say it is too hard. What exactly would voters like to see? Eighty-one percent support requiring identification to vote; 68% “strongly support” that measure, which Congressional Democrats tried to make illegal (unconstitutionally so) in all 50 states, just a few years ago. Like many other states, Minnesota has replaced Election Day with Election Autumn. Early voting begins on September 20, a solid 6 1/2 weeks before Election Autumn concludes. This isn’t by popular demand: 17% of Minnesotans want no early voting at all, while 77% want three weeks or less. Minnesota is the only state that allows same-day registration but does not have provisional ballots. In Minnesota, you can show up at the polls without evidence that you are a legal voter who resides in the precinct, and, if vouched for by a partisan representative stationed at the polling place, feed a ballot into the machine. Supposedly the county will follow up to see whether you are actually a qualified voter, but in the meantime, your ballot has been counted and there is no taking it back. Again, this is not what voters want: by 59% to 39%, Minnesotans say they want provisional ballots. Normally, when a political party sees that an issue is overwhelmingly popular–start with voter ID, at 81% support, and go down the line–they get behind it. Why wouldn’t Minnesota’s Democrats (or Democrats in any other state) get on the bandwagon? For some reason, Democrats in every state fight all efforts to improve ballot security tooth and nail, no matter how much public support those measures have. How can we explain such seemingly perverse behavior? I think the only reasonable interpretation is that Democrats consider voter fraud an important part of their electoral strategy, and therefore are determined to stymie any attempt to prevent it. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/09/voter-fraud-what-voter-fraud.php No, the left's line is that you have to be a citizen to vote. It is rare that a non-citizen would vote and if they do, they should be prosecuted. The right's line is that the left wants and encourages illegals to vote but offer no proof that is happening. The Biden administration's prosecution of an illegal who voted is consistent with the former, not the latter. 4 minutes ago, B-Man said: What's your point? You're incapable of reading your own links? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts