Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Every NFL player that was a guest on the Manning cast has lost their next game!!  Josh will break the jinx!!!

 

https://www.newyorkupstate.com/buffalo-bills/2021/11/manning-cast-curse-can-bills-josh-allen-end-jinx-that-tom-brady-matt-stafford-russell-wilson-have-succumbed-to.html

 

Week 1 guest: Seahawks QB Russell Wilson
Week 2 result: 33-30 overtime loss to Tennessee Titans

Week 1 guest: Chiefs TE Travis Kelce
Week 2 result: 36-35 loss to Baltimore Ravens

Week 2 guest: Tampa Bay Buccaneers TE Rob Gronkowski
Week 3 result: 34-24 loss to Los Angeles Rams

Week 3 guest: Los Angeles Rams QB Matt Stafford
Week 4 result: 37-20 loss to Arizona Cardinals

Week 7 guest: Buccaneers QB Tom Brady
Week 8 result: 36-27 loss to New Orleans Saints

Edited by BillsFanThru-N-Thru
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, teef said:

they are gene?

 

11 minutes ago, Gene1973 said:

People see patterns in randomness that simply are not there. It's how our brains try to make sense of our environment. There are too many raw variables to take into accout, so our brains tend to package things in ways to dumb them down so our conscious mind can interpret/handle.

 

Jinxes are fake news.

Wow, Gene was serious. 
 

Edited by atlbillsfan1975
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Doc said:

If they can't beat the Jags...

Definitely an excellent test for the validity of the jinx. I say probably less powerful than announcer talking about how a kicker hasn't missed in twenty straight attempts and certainly not Madden cover strong, but you never know. Small sample size and most likely, as the optimist Gene has pointed out, all this is random. Stochastic incident, however, has never appealed to civilization, which prefers magical connections on the etheric plane as tips for betting.

Posted
10 minutes ago, RobbRiddick said:

Every time the opponent has more points at the end of the game, the Bills lose


 

That seems like a pattern in randomness - might be a jinx.

 

How many times have the Bills lost when they have more points at the end of the game?


 

 

 

 

Reading this board sometimes - I think it is frequent.

 

😂

Posted
26 minutes ago, Gene1973 said:

People see patterns in randomness that simply are not there. It's how our brains try to make sense of our environment. There are too many raw variables to take into accout, so our brains tend to package things in ways to dumb them down so our conscious mind can interpret/handle.

 

Jinxes are fake news.

thank you for your time and sorting this out.  you're a valuable member of this community, and your accomplishments don't go unnoticed.

16 minutes ago, atlbillsfan1975 said:

 

Wow, Gene was serious. 
 

gene is all business, all the time.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Blainorama5 said:

I have a feeling the Bills D may win the game all by themselves.  I think all Josh & Co. need to deliver is a couple of field goals.  🤪

 

I want a nice comfortable blowout. It was no fun watching a 3-3 game into the 3rd quarter being nervous that the Bills might blow it. Just when you think you can relax at 17-3 the fish come right back and make it 17-11 and its nervous time again. I don't want that this week. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

Definitely an excellent test for the validity of the jinx. I say probably less powerful than announcer talking about how a kicker hasn't missed in twenty straight attempts and certainly not Madden cover strong, but you never know. Small sample size and most likely, as the optimist Gene has pointed out, all this is random. Stochastic incident, however, has never appealed to civilization, which prefers magical connections on the etheric plane as tips for betting.

Everytime they mentions JA's no turnover streak in the red zone I hold my breath. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, LVGrown said:

Everytime they mentions JA's no turnover streak in the red zone I hold my breath. 

 

I was thinking of that the other day.  What's the streak up to now?

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...