Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 10/22/2021 at 1:55 PM, folz said:

Maybe he was in the Flutie camp and so is referring to Rob Johnson (but if memory serves, Rob played fairly well in the game and we had a chance to win---though I thought and wanted Flutie to start that game too). Otherwise, I doubt he would be singling out, say, one special teamer...saying it was their fault (on that particular play). It seemed the whole ST blew that play...but I guess there could have been one ST player who was meant to play (final) contain and left his post.

 

Other options: He could put that game on the refs for not calling it a forward pass...but the mental health part of that question wouldn't really make sense then. The refs in that game were worried about their physical health (not their mental health) if they had disallowed the TD in a hostile Tenn atmosphere.

Rob Johnson threw for 131 yards, had a completion percentage of 45.5%, thew zero TD's, and was sacked 6 times, for a wonderful rating of 64.8.

 

Those who say he had a good game are either misremembering or trying to sell you something.

 

He DID have a final drive where he led the team down for a score (bringing the total to 16 points). But that's about all he was good for.

 

Rob Johnson was a terrible QB.

41 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

RJ.  Team didn’t respect that loser.

Yes, we should all be able to agree that he was a loser, regardless of where everyone was on the Flute vs Johnson debate. He was great at losing games. He was 9-17 as a starter in Buffalo.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, machine gun kelly said:

He threw for 160 yards (RJ).  He sucked, and Flutie brought them all of those wins to get to the wildcard game.  Wade was eventually going to get fired.  He shouldve said screw you Ralph and played Flutie.  If they won and made it closer to the SB, he would've been forgiven.  We were better than the Titans.  We could've made it to the Rams, and that would've been fun. The #1 punishing defense against the Greatest Show on Turf.  Big Old Teddie would've sat on Marshall Faulk and stopped him.

The Bills had the lead in that game and would've met the Rams had Porter did his damn job and stayed in his lane. I would've preferably kicked in out of the end zone and made them go 80 yards. So I blame both Porter and whoever decided to give them the opportunity to return the kickoff

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said:

The Bills had the lead in that game and would've met the Rams had Porter did his damn job and stayed in his lane. I would've preferably kicked in out of the end zone and made them go 80 yards. So I blame both Porter and whoever decided to give them the opportunity to return the kickoff

 

Well, i mean we still would have to have won 2 games on the road still to meet the Rams.  No guarantee there

Posted
23 hours ago, BearNorth said:

Yes that was a point of controversy.  We had a 1st & 10 at the Titan 23.  20 seconds left when we kicked the FG, :16 when it went through the uprights.  DeHaven wanted to run a couple of sideline outs, then kick the FG, but Wade with no timeouts overruled him.  Yes, should have run the clock to :03 and kicked the FG.   

 

I was working in Nashville at the time, and one of our vendors asked me if I wanted tickets, as he was not going to be able to use them.

Dehaven’s plan might burn 6 to 8 seconds.   If Johnson gets picked, or takes a sack, or we get a penalty we have no time outs and then we can discuss why he didn’t just kick  for 3.  

Posted

The clock management ultimately lost the game.  As stated, it was 1st and 10 at the Titans' 23 and they had just taken their 1st timeout prior to the FG try to stop the clock at :20.  You run the ball twice and the Titans are forced to take their remaining TOs, and if they don't, can at least spike the ball.  Then kick the FG on 3rd down leaving 10 seconds or so left.  Then you kickoff into the endzone.  Why they had to kick it on 1st down and with :20 left is anyone's guess. Heck, even kneel-downs would have worked since it would have made the kick a 42-yarder instead of 40.

Posted
13 hours ago, MJS said:

Rob Johnson threw for 131 yards, had a completion percentage of 45.5%, thew zero TD's, and was sacked 6 times, for a wonderful rating of 64.8.

 

And one of those sacks was in the end zone. Flutie was more mobile and most likely wouldn't have taken that safety.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, WhoTom said:

 

And one of those sacks was in the end zone. Flutie was more mobile and most likely wouldn't have taken that safety.

 

Yet Flutie also was more prone to turnovers, there's no telling for sure we would have been in better position to win or lose with him starting. 

Posted
On 10/22/2021 at 6:02 PM, Rico said:

Easiest to just blame Ralph anyways. Because Ralph.

Ya gotta admit, Ralph by that time wasn’t the sharpest tool in the shed…, and the next near two decades proves this out…, 

Posted
16 hours ago, MJS said:

Rob Johnson threw for 131 yards, had a completion percentage of 45.5%, thew zero TD's, and was sacked 6 times, for a wonderful rating of 64.8.

 

Those who say he had a good game are either misremembering or trying to sell you something.

 

He DID have a final drive where he led the team down for a score (bringing the total to 16 points). But that's about all he was good for.

 

Rob Johnson was a terrible QB.

Yes, we should all be able to agree that he was a loser, regardless of where everyone was on the Flute vs Johnson debate. He was great at losing games. He was 9-17 as a starter in Buffalo.

 

Flutie was also awful.  His completion percentage while in Buffalo was about 56, RJ had 60.  Neither Flutie or RJ ever won a playoff game.   They both were overrated by their respective fans, both were backup level players.  

Posted
9 minutes ago, RyanC883 said:

Flutie was also awful.  His completion percentage while in Buffalo was about 56, RJ had 60.  Neither Flutie or RJ ever won a playoff game.   They both were overrated by their respective fans, both were backup level players.  

 

Flutie was figured-out midway through the 1999 season.  RJ was a sack-taking injury-prone guy. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...