Irv Posted December 28, 2023 Author Posted December 28, 2023 NY Times confirming Michelle Obammy preparing for Barry’s fourth term. What a mess. 1
K D Posted January 3 Posted January 3 7 minutes ago, B-Man said: . Hope they kept the receipt! Otherwise you are getting store credit (Kamala) 3
B-Man Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Report: The Obamas 'Working' to Take Biden 'Out' of Race, Barack Telling Him to Quit by Nick Arama There have been multiple reports about Barack Obama and his aides being worried about how Joe Biden and his teams were conducting their campaign. Obama was supposedly worried about the strength of Donald Trump and that the Biden campaign wasn't hitting the ground running. Obama aides put a sharper point on that, admitting that the "bromance" with Joe Biden was always exaggerated and that the Biden campaign "didn’t have its s--- together," https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/01/25/report-barack-obama-telling-biden-to-drop-out-and-what-michelle-thinks-about-race-n2169181 Well, that's Redstate propaganda, I don't believe that. . . . . . . . . LOL .
Doc Posted January 26 Posted January 26 14 minutes ago, B-Man said: Report: The Obamas 'Working' to Take Biden 'Out' of Race, Barack Telling Him to Quit by Nick Arama There have been multiple reports about Barack Obama and his aides being worried about how Joe Biden and his teams were conducting their campaign. Obama was supposedly worried about the strength of Donald Trump and that the Biden campaign wasn't hitting the ground running. Obama aides put a sharper point on that, admitting that the "bromance" with Joe Biden was always exaggerated and that the Biden campaign "didn’t have its s--- together," https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/01/25/report-barack-obama-telling-biden-to-drop-out-and-what-michelle-thinks-about-race-n2169181 Well, that's Redstate propaganda, I don't believe that. . . . . . . . . LOL LOL. And replace him with whom? 1
B-Man Posted January 26 Posted January 26 CNN’s Van Jones Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About Joe Biden MATT MARGOLIS “If I were Biden, I would... I would stay hidden,” Jones said during a panel discussion after the New Hampshire primaries. “And I’ll tell you why — he doesn’t inspire confidence. And he’s not a great messenger for himself." Of course, after throwing Biden under the bus, he had to go into the obligatory Biden Praise Mode to make up for the fact that he basically said that Biden is a liability to his own campaign. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/01/25/cnns-van-jones-says-the-quiet-part-out-loud-about-joe-biden-n4925835 .
B-Man Posted February 5 Posted February 5 Democrats Won't Replace Biden. Here's Why. CHARLES C.W. COOKE It’s not an accident that Joe Biden was voted in as the Democrats’ presidential nominee in the first place, and, even now, it’s not at all obvious to me that anyone else would represent an improvement over him. That isn’t because Biden is strong — he’s not, he’s a disaster — but because the Democratic coalition doesn’t actually make a great deal of sense, and to remove Biden from its head would be to start a fight over the direction of the party that the party would be foolish to start deliberately in an election year. I don’t think they’ll do it. … I’d invite you to look back to the last competitive set of Democratic primaries, in which, at a relatively late stage, Biden was engineered into the nomination by a team of palpably panicking party-power-brokers, who intuited correctly that he was the only candidate who could unite its various factions and have a shot in the general election. At that time, the alternatives to Biden were Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg. Even now, does anyone really think that the Democrats made the wrong choice? I don’t. And, because I don’t, I am highly skeptical that the party will want to take the same risk four years later. https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-democrats-probably-dont-want-a-divisive-nomination-fight-right-now/
Doc Posted February 5 Posted February 5 Just now, B-Man said: Democrats Won't Replace Biden. Here's Why. CHARLES C.W. COOKE It’s not an accident that Joe Biden was voted in as the Democrats’ presidential nominee in the first place, and, even now, it’s not at all obvious to me that anyone else would represent an improvement over him. That isn’t because Biden is strong — he’s not, he’s a disaster — but because the Democratic coalition doesn’t actually make a great deal of sense, and to remove Biden from its head would be to start a fight over the direction of the party that the party would be foolish to start deliberately in an election year. I don’t think they’ll do it. … I’d invite you to look back to the last competitive set of Democratic primaries, in which, at a relatively late stage, Biden was engineered into the nomination by a team of palpably panicking party-power-brokers, who intuited correctly that he was the only candidate who could unite its various factions and have a shot in the general election. At that time, the alternatives to Biden were Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg. Even now, does anyone really think that the Democrats made the wrong choice? I don’t. And, because I don’t, I am highly skeptical that the party will want to take the same risk four years later. https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-democrats-probably-dont-want-a-divisive-nomination-fight-right-now/ More like can't. There's no one else. 1
Gregg Posted February 5 Posted February 5 56 minutes ago, Doc said: More like can't. There's no one else. My guess is they would try to get Obama's 4th term running the country through Michelle as the "President" or get Governor Clown from CA to do it. God help us if one of those scenarios happened.
Doc Posted February 5 Posted February 5 1 hour ago, Gregg said: My guess is they would try to get Obama's 4th term running the country through Michelle as the "President" or get Governor Clown from CA to do it. God help us if one of those scenarios happened. No chance. 1
Gregg Posted February 6 Posted February 6 13 hours ago, Doc said: No chance. Kamala is even dumber and less popular than the drooling vegetable. They would have to pick someone.
B-Man Posted February 9 Posted February 9 BREAKING: Biden's Unannounced Nighttime Speech an Absolute DISASTER MATT MARGOLIS President Joe Biden took to the microphone for an unannounced address on Thursday night, following the release of the politically devastating Special Counsel report that said he "willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen." While the report stated that such actions "present serious risks to national security,” Biden will not face charges because he presents himself as an “elderly man with a poor memory” and it would be difficult to convince a jury he is guilty of a serious felony because to commit such a crime “requires a mental state of willfulness.” The report elaborated by pointing out he couldn’t even remember when he was vice president and didn’t even remember when his son Beau died. The address was scheduled for 7:45 p.m. but did not actually get underway until around 8 — well past his usual 7 p.m. bedtime. I can't explain how or why Biden's handlers felt it was a good idea to trot him out at night to talk about the special counsel report, but it did not go well. He was belligerent and defensive, and it was a terrible look. When he addressed the report claiming that he couldn't remember when his son died, it really got bad. "How in the hell dare he raise that," Biden said angrily, concluding that it is "none of their damn business." "For any extraneous commentary, they don't know what they're talking about," Biden insisted, even though the report presented direct quotes. "It has no place in this report." https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/02/08/bidens-unannounced-nighttime-speech-an-absolute-disaster-n4926280 I think that they trotted him out there on purpose. . 2
Doc Posted February 9 Posted February 9 17 hours ago, B-Man said: BREAKING: Biden's Unannounced Nighttime Speech an Absolute DISASTER MATT MARGOLIS President Joe Biden took to the microphone for an unannounced address on Thursday night, following the release of the politically devastating Special Counsel report that said he "willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen." While the report stated that such actions "present serious risks to national security,” Biden will not face charges because he presents himself as an “elderly man with a poor memory” and it would be difficult to convince a jury he is guilty of a serious felony because to commit such a crime “requires a mental state of willfulness.” The report elaborated by pointing out he couldn’t even remember when he was vice president and didn’t even remember when his son Beau died. The address was scheduled for 7:45 p.m. but did not actually get underway until around 8 — well past his usual 7 p.m. bedtime. I can't explain how or why Biden's handlers felt it was a good idea to trot him out at night to talk about the special counsel report, but it did not go well. He was belligerent and defensive, and it was a terrible look. When he addressed the report claiming that he couldn't remember when his son died, it really got bad. "How in the hell dare he raise that," Biden said angrily, concluding that it is "none of their damn business." "For any extraneous commentary, they don't know what they're talking about," Biden insisted, even though the report presented direct quotes. "It has no place in this report." https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/02/08/bidens-unannounced-nighttime-speech-an-absolute-disaster-n4926280 I think that they trotted him out there on purpose. They handed him the rope and... 1
Precision Posted February 9 Posted February 9 The D's are in trouble now that Biden is mentally declining faster than expected. If they were smart, they would have been promoting a clear number 2 should Biden falter further or pass. Normally that would be the VP but Harris's favorability rating is on par with Biden's and I'm not sure she's more cognizant than him. They'll like turn to someone like Newsome which would make sense for the D's since everyone hates CA. A smart move would be to push someone else who could compensate for their weaknesses in the 2024 election. A good choice could be someone like Shapiro who has a high favorability rating and could likely flip other rust belt states in addition to PA. 1
Doc Posted February 9 Posted February 9 8 minutes ago, Precision said: The D's are in trouble now that Biden is mentally declining faster than expected. If they were smart, they would have been promoting a clear number 2 should Biden falter further or pass. Normally that would be the VP but Harris's favorability rating is on par with Biden's and I'm not sure she's more cognizant than him. They'll like turn to someone like Newsome which would make sense for the D's since everyone hates CA. A smart move would be to push someone else who could compensate for their weaknesses in the 2024 election. A good choice could be someone like Shapiro who has a high favorability rating and could likely flip other rust belt states in addition to PA. They're in trouble now that an Independent Counsel declared Joke to be what many of us knew and Dems refused to admit: a criminal and senile. They were just hoping that they could hide it until the election and fool everybody into re-electing those 2 morons and destroying the country further.
Precision Posted February 9 Posted February 9 15 minutes ago, Doc said: They're in trouble now that an Independent Counsel declared Joke to be what many of us knew and Dems refused to admit: a criminal and senile. They were just hoping that they could hide it until the election and fool everybody into re-electing those 2 morons and destroying the country further. I understand the thought process of getting him to finish his term but running him again is borderline criminal. We can only hope that someday those responsible (and Biden's mental capacity) is exposed through a FOIA request.
BillStime Posted February 9 Posted February 9 Just now, Precision said: I understand the thought process of getting him to finish his term but running him again is borderline criminal. We can only hope that someday those responsible (and Biden's mental capacity) is exposed through a FOIA request. And the cult running a criminal isn’t just… criminal? Do you idiots ever think? Go back to your safe place galactic.
Doc Posted February 9 Posted February 9 7 minutes ago, Precision said: I understand the thought process of getting him to finish his term but running him again is borderline criminal. We can only hope that someday those responsible (and Biden's mental capacity) is exposed through a FOIA request. They don't care, as long as they get a Dem into the WH. 2
Recommended Posts