JimBob2232 Posted April 29, 2005 Share Posted April 29, 2005 Gee, good thing with all this government we've gotten rid of street people and crime. dry.gif I think your missing my point I am all for smaller, less intrusive government. As Reagan said, Government is not the solution, government is the problem. I believe he is correct. Privatization of social security reduces government control over your life and money, while at the same time requiring every person to save for their retirement. Its a balancing act. No government is bad. Too much government is bad. Somewhere in the middle is the right amount of government. Privatazation of social secuirty is the right way to go. Let me keep my own money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted April 29, 2005 Share Posted April 29, 2005 I think your missing my point I am all for smaller, less intrusive government. As Reagan said, Government is not the solution, government is the problem. I believe he is correct. Privatization of social security reduces government control over your life and money, while at the same time requiring every person to save for their retirement. Its a balancing act. No government is bad. Too much government is bad. Somewhere in the middle is the right amount of government. Privatazation of social secuirty is the right way to go. Let me keep my own money. 324044[/snapback] Nah, I just wanted to toss in another truism - for that is what I do. I'm not for anarchy. I just want the federal government to be limited to its Constitutional Duties. Personally, I don't think that privitization of SS is the right way to go. I think it's a step in the right direction but at the end of the day elimination of SS altogether should be the ultimate goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted April 30, 2005 Share Posted April 30, 2005 Nah, I just wanted to toss in another truism - for that is what I do. I'm not for anarchy. I just want the federal government to be limited to its Constitutional Duties. Personally, I don't think that privitization of SS is the right way to go. I think it's a step in the right direction but at the end of the day elimination of SS altogether should be the ultimate goal. 324050[/snapback] So you are a strict constructionist? That being so? How does one resolve that the nation, society, and world is a vastly different place than it was in 1789? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted April 30, 2005 Share Posted April 30, 2005 So you are a strict constructionist? That being so? How does one resolve that the nation, society, and world is a vastly different place than it was in 1789? 324067[/snapback] Define vastly different. I don't see it that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campy Posted April 30, 2005 Share Posted April 30, 2005 So what you are saying is that you are a hot pocket, window licking lemming. And I mean that in only the most sincere way. 323739[/snapback] Right. I, like 99.9% of petro consumers, simply don't care which "brand" is dumped into the gas station's tanks. I'm sorry I mistakingly made you out to be something other than the hardcore Exxon-loyalist you are Nobody (other than you) cares what "brand" the gas is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted April 30, 2005 Share Posted April 30, 2005 Define vastly different. I don't see it that way. 324074[/snapback] One that was vastly agrarian and self-sufficient.. now vastly industrial, service orientated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts