Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

If true, and I would expect Rivet wouldn't be lying, that's pathetic.  But not surprising.  I soured on Jackie a couple years after he joined the Sabres.  

 

 

That would be great to see.

Okposo, but No Eichel in the photo makes me think he’s telling the truth.
Like you said, I don’t expect he’d be lying about this.

 

It also sounds like it’s just one of many not so flattering Jack Eichel stories.

 

 

 

 

on a somewhat similar subject, I don’t think Eichel has been made available to the media once since his post-game interview in Buffalo. Wonder why… 😂

They weren’t going to make him available after that Buffalo game either but I guess Mike Harrington was pretty vocal and Eichel ended up coming out.

Posted
4 hours ago, Doc said:

 

I'd like one or both to just go straight to the Sabres.  The argument is you can ruin them by playing them too early, but I've heard the same argument for QBs and Josh became a stud despite practically starting as a rookie.

 

Straight to Sabres is a mistake, these kids need to develop in Rochester first.

Posted
2 hours ago, The Jokeman said:

Straight to Sabres is a mistake, these kids need to develop in Rochester first.

 

All the same, I'd Iike to see Levi on the Sabres for a few games like PTR said.

Posted
23 hours ago, The Jokeman said:

Straight to Sabres is a mistake, these kids need to develop in Rochester first.

I think the times are starting to change in those regards.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, TBBills said:

I think the times are starting to change in those regards.

I tend to think you are right, the NHL is slowly following the pace of the NFL. Rookies used to sit for a year or two, unless an extraordinary player, but now 1st and 2nd rounders... even 3rds... are going in right away. Of course rookies in the NHL come from farm clubs but I see the trend as well.

 

Looking forward to the game in a half an hour.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted


 

😯 almost Hasek-like.

 


 

feel bad he lost today. He carried them all season. Definitely anxious to see if the Sabres sign him or he goes back to college for another year. Not sure what he has left to prove in college. 

Posted

Glad I decided to watch this one... RJ And Harry Neale, plus, this intermission is a riot. Don't think I even had pubes when RJ started calling the games in 71.

Posted

Ah well, we got a point... like it matters. I hate the dingy looking jerseys/sweaters, never really heard why we are wearing them nor have I looked it up.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, T&C said:

Ah well, we got a point... like it matters. I hate the dingy looking jerseys/sweaters, never really heard why we are wearing them nor have I looked it up.

That second guy in the shootout who walked in…..Tokarski should have conceded the goal, skated out and punched him right in the face,  Bush league.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

That second guy in the shootout who walked in…..Tokarski should have conceded the goal, skated out and punched him right in the face,  Bush league.

Yep. I can’t stand shootout attempts like that. To me, stuff like that should be considered a violation of the forward momentum rule. Same with the ones where a guy skates in real wide then stick handles at a crawl sideways in front of the net. I know it’s a legal attempt within the rules but I definitely think it pushes the boundaries.
 

I kind of wish they’d put a time limit on shootout attempts or something.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, BillsFan4 said:

Yep. I can’t stand shootout attempts like that. To me, stuff like that should be considered a violation of the forward momentum rule. Same with the ones where a guy skates in real wide then stick handles at a crawl sideways in front of the net. I know it’s a legal attempt within the rules but I definitely think it pushes the boundaries.
 

I kind of wish they’d put a time limit on shootout attempts or something.

That rediculous inching towards the goal should be banned.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

I hate that super slow crap too but if a Sabre did it and scored it would look a lot better

 

A simple shot clock could work.  How many seconds would be appropriate?

Edited by Bob in Mich
Posted
Just now, Bob in Mich said:

I hate that super slow crap too but if a Sabre did it and scored it would look a lot better

 

A simple shot clock could work.  How many seconds is appropriate?

 

Forget the clock.

Just cut a defenseman loose behind the shooter about 2 seconds after he crosses the center line.

Dangling leads to strangling.......

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Simon said:

 

Forget the clock.

Just cut a defenseman loose behind the shooter about 2 seconds after he crosses the center line.

Dangling leads to strangling.......

That’s an interesting idea but not gonna happen, eh?  It would make the shootout more like the game though. I have understood instituting the shootout and it can show off some amazing individual skills but it certainly isn’t all that much like the game itself

 

Anyone else watching the college hockey tourney?  Been some very entertaining games.  Michigan has a couple of Sabre prospects to help the interest level too

 

Hopping between the college and pro hockey games on TV I found myself yelling at the Sabres to ‘hit that guy’.  I know there is a playoff intensity that is not in the pro game but damn, I sure wish we followed through on our checks a whole lot more often

Edited by Bob in Mich
Posted

Looking forward to the matinee game at 5, the weather is so freaking perfect I'm going to watch it out back on a chromebook with a fire going... and beer. Wish these game actually meant something in the standings besides progress. 

Posted

If on the shoot out attempts a defender were at the far blue line and started forward the same time as the shooter there might be a little more urgency to get the shot off…

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...