Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
46 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


I was dead wrong about Sanders. I pinned him as a diva and sort of an anti-process guy. That view stemmed from him bad mouthing Ben R for no reason when he left Pittsburgh. 

hate the word diva but there's no evidence he is one. Has played well everywhere he's been and doesn't cause problems

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

Thanks; I appreciate that.

 

I subjected myself to a real IQ test once, and I scored in the first category down from the top. I believe the Stanford-Binet model was used for scoring (attached below).

 

What's really super interesting to me is that one can say exactly the same thing both here and on Twitter, and the two collective responses are completely different. This really is a tough crowd of unconditional fans who think their job is to support and defend the team and players without objectivity.

 

Screenshot_20211002-070704_Chrome.jpg

I’m quite sure you have a big d*** too, but why does such a smart guy find it necessary to tell us all about it?

Edited by Chandler#81
Moderator Edit for language
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, FLFan said:

 

Correct.  The absolutely most useless type of analysis is hindsight analysis.  Literally anyone can pick the right answer after the question has already been answered.  

 

16 hours ago, syhuang said:

 

In the meantime, if Bills didn't draft Leif Larsen and drafted the QB picked 5 picks later .......

 

 


 

 

Absolutely correct.

 

The other issue with hindsight analysis is it is all based upon a series of events that then does not happen with the change.

 

If the Bills (or anyone else) draft Brady - does he ever become the Tom Brady.  Probably not.  Most teams give very little look to a sixth round underdeveloped QB, but he got his chance and ran with it with the perfect team to allow him time to develop and become who he is.

 

Wyatt Teller on the Bills - never solves our guard problem.  He played 1/2 a season with us and was Ike or Cody level.  We traded him to Cleveland and that first season he was one of the worst starting guards in the league.  He was where everyone complains about Cody Ford being.  He couldn’t pass block at all and was barely passable as a run blocker.

 

Teller changed when the coaching staff changed and they went to a heavy run formation and run blocking scheme.  I doubt Wyatt Teller on the Bills ever develops in that same way because the technique and strength he had and built was in the run blocking game and as a pass first team - we would not have asked nor developed those characteristics.  
 

It is the dumbest thing ever to say can you image If we had never traded Teller - yes I can - he would have been cut if he hadn’t been traded because he was not better than the top 10 linemen here at the time.  Good for him to develop, but even better for him that he got on a team that happened to change staffs to his perfect fit.

 

🤦‍♂️

Edited by Rochesterfan
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 4
Posted
30 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

 

For no reason known to you, that is.


there is no reason to go to a new team and publicly bad mouth your prior QB, no matter how bad he is. I think E Sanders had since expressed remorse for making those public statements, and he is obviously an older and more mature player at this point. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

Thanks; I appreciate that.

 

I subjected myself to a real IQ test once, and I scored in the first category down from the top. I believe the Stanford-Binet model was used for scoring (attached below).

 

What's really super interesting to me is that one can say exactly the same thing both here and on Twitter, and the two collective responses are completely different. This really is a tough crowd of unconditional fans who think their job is to support and defend the team and players without objectivity.

 

Screenshot_20211002-070704_Chrome.jpg

Time to make TBD a better place for myself... another genius (excuse me! NEAR GENIUS) goes on the ignore list. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


I was dead wrong about Sanders. I pinned him as a diva and sort of an anti-process guy. That view stemmed from him bad mouthing Ben R for no reason when he left Pittsburgh. 

Bad mouthing big rapey is actually a sign of good character. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


there is no reason to go to a new team and publicly bad mouth your prior QB, no matter how bad he is. I think E Sanders had since expressed remorse for making those public statements, and he is obviously an older and more mature player at this point. 

that's fair if that is how you feel.

 

I just read this article, and I have no problem with E Sanders saying what he said. And neither does he. 

 

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/01/27/emmanuel-sanders-on-ben-roethlisberger-that-bridge-was-burnt/

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:


How much ya bench?


He once argued with me that McDermott struggles against rookie QB’s.  I then told him he’s won his last 5 against rookie QB’s and only gives up like 14 ppg.  But that fact wasn’t strong enough evidence.

Did I say he struggled or that he just doesn't dominate them like you'd expect? I know I said he usually does win. At any rate, that wasn't my best argument.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

that's fair if that is how you feel.

 

I just read this article, and I have no problem with E Sanders saying what he said. And neither does he. 

 

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/01/27/emmanuel-sanders-on-ben-roethlisberger-that-bridge-was-burnt/

 

 


I think this proves my point a little. he wanted to go back to Pittsburgh but couldn’t because he publicly insulted the QB. No matter how you spin it, that comment was a dumb and gratuitous move.  I suspect he regrets it in hindsight. But I guess we can agree to disagree. 

  • Vomit 1
Posted
5 hours ago, WotAGuy said:


So he’s moved up from “bust” to “not a great player”?  

 

He’s getting better as we speak!

To be a top-10 pick and not a great player is, in my opinion, a bust. You certainly draft in that position expecting a cornerstone/building block piece.

4 hours ago, clayboy54 said:

I’m quite sure you have a big d*** too, but why does such a smart guy find it necessary to tell us all about it?

I didn't until people insulted my intelligence. Then I have a right to defend myself.

Posted
3 hours ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

Thanks; I appreciate that.

 

I subjected myself to a real IQ test once, and I scored in the first category down from the top. I believe the Stanford-Binet model was used for scoring (attached below).

 

What's really super interesting to me is that one can say exactly the same thing both here and on Twitter, and the two collective responses are completely different. This really is a tough crowd of unconditional fans who think their job is to support and defend the team and players without objectivity.

 

Screenshot_20211002-070704_Chrome.jpg

You didn’t.  You didn’t just do this!   

2 hours ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

There's certainly no attention seeking. I often defend myself when criticized though.

 

On Oliver, it would seem obvious to the average fan that he's not a great player. You don't need complex analysis to determine that when it's right before your eyes. It's like someone being asked to prove that water is wet. As a top-10 pick, his impact should be self evident.

Dude, your attention seeking is now through the roof.  Do you really think people don’t see through it?   You wanted a response, posted an absurd post, and had to re-quote yourself because you didn’t get the reaction you wanted.  You’re like the girl who acts drunk at the party. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

Did I say he struggled or that he just doesn't dominate them like you'd expect? I know I said he usually does win. At any rate, that wasn't my best argument.

Because it wasn't rooted in any fact... it was something you made up off the top of your head. 

 

You are all upset and claim the majority of people on this board are incapable of being objective... yet there was zero objectivity in your claim. It was rooted in opinion. 

29 minutes ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

To be a top-10 pick and not a great player is, in my opinion, a bust. You certainly draft in that position expecting a cornerstone/building block piece.

Again... here is an opinion... that's not objective. Find a reputable source and their definition of what a bust is and then make your argument based on that. 

 

I personally don't have an issue with you having an opinion... nor do I have an issue with you striving for people to be objective.

 

The issue is you're taking your opinion, the word objective and conflating them. 

 

You're not a dumb guy, you have some great posts, just hold yourself to the same standard that you're trying to hold everyone else to. 

Edited by JGMcD2
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Rochesterfan said:

 


 

 

Absolutely correct.

 

The other issue with hindsight analysis is it is all based upon a series of events that then does not happen with the change.

 

If the Bills (or anyone else) draft Brady - does he ever become the Tom Brady.  Probably not.  Most teams give very little look to a sixth round underdeveloped QB, but he got his chance and ran with it with the perfect team to allow him time to develop and become who he is.

 

Wyatt Teller on the Bills - never solves our guard problem.  He played 1/2 a season with us and was Ike or Cody level.  We traded him to Cleveland and that first season he was one of the worst starting guards in the league.  He was where everyone complains about Cody Ford being.  He couldn’t pass block at all and was barely passable as a run blocker.

 

Teller changed when the coaching staff changed and they went to a heavy run formation and run blocking scheme.  I doubt Wyatt Teller on the Bills ever develops in that same way because the technique and strength he had and built was in the run blocking game and as a pass first team - we would not have asked nor developed those characteristics.  
 

It is the dumbest thing ever to say can you image If we had never traded Teller - yes I can - he would have been cut if he hadn’t been traded because he was not better than the top 10 linemen here at the time.  Good for him to develop, but even better for him that he got on a team that happened to change staffs to his perfect fit.

 

🤦‍♂️


Sorry not buying this.  It cannot possibly be this difficult to find a professional guard who fits their “scheme.”  Teller is clearly good enough to play in any scheme; Ford is so bad he’d bomb out of any scheme.  The more likely scenario is that Beane has an issue with evaluating interior linemen.  Could also be an issue with the coaching staff and scouts not being on the same page but what should be the easiest position in the NFL to fill has been a constant weakness for this group.

Posted
51 minutes ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

Did I say he struggled or that he just doesn't dominate them like you'd expect? I know I said he usually does win. At any rate, that wasn't my best argument.

 

Your exact words were "he doesn't have a good history against rookie QB's".

 

Then I showed you the scores in the last 5 times he's faced rookies.  So basically you were 100% wrong but then tried to save face by saying "well he didn't dominate like you expect"....lol.

43 minutes ago, teef said:

You didn’t.  You didn’t just do this!   

Dude, your attention seeking is now through the roof.  Do you really think people don’t see through it?   You wanted a response, posted an absurd post, and had to re-quote yourself because you didn’t get the reaction you wanted.  You’re like the girl who acts drunk at the party

 

"Girls, this weed is so good, I'm so high!".

 

"Karen, you've been smoking oregano".  

 

Remember this thread?

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, SWATeam said:

I'll withhold opinion until I find out what kind of car he drives

And how many high level meetings

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:


Sorry not buying this.  It cannot possibly be this difficult to find a professional guard who fits their “scheme.”  Teller is clearly good enough to play in any scheme; Ford is so bad he’d bomb out of any scheme.  The more likely scenario is that Beane has an issue with evaluating interior linemen.  Could also be an issue with the coaching staff and scouts not being on the same page but what should be the easiest position in the NFL to fill has been a constant weakness for this group.

 

NFL guard especially is hard to find now.  I watched a segment a few years ago how there's a crisis in offensive lineman, in particular the guard position.

This is why a good NFL guard now makes insane money....there's not a lot of them.

 

https://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/ct-spt-nfl-guards-20180810-story.html

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

I didn't until people insulted my intelligence. Then I have a right to defend myself.

C’mon, you know what it’s like on here as well as anybody. Every hot take has a bunch of morons calling the OP an idiot. That’s part of why this board is so enjoyable to read. If you don’t want expose yourself to that, you really ought not post such strong convictions. Nobody cares whether or not you, or I are geniuses or fools. We’re j’ust a bunch of passionate fans having fun.

Edited by clayboy54
  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
10 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:


Sorry not buying this.  It cannot possibly be this difficult to find a professional guard who fits their “scheme.”  Teller is clearly good enough to play in any scheme; Ford is so bad he’d bomb out of any scheme.  The more likely scenario is that Beane has an issue with evaluating interior linemen.  Could also be an issue with the coaching staff and scouts not being on the same page but what should be the easiest position in the NFL to fill has been a constant weakness for this group.


 

Then explain this - why in his first year in Cleveland was he one of the Leagues worst guards?

 

If he was so great - why did the Cleveland fan base want to move on.

 

It is one thing to argue this if he had gone to Cleveland and immediately showed anything, but he didn’t.  It was not until they changed schemes and got a run first head coach that he excelled.

 

He started 1/2 a season in Buffalo and was adequate at run blocking, but was Cody Ford level pass blocking.  The team then brought in Long, Spain, and Mongo to fill the o-line and Teller was not better than them at the time.  It wasn’t an issue evaluating him - he just wasn’t a good pass blocker.

 

He gets traded to Cleveland in the final year of a regime and the start of the Mayfield era and that OL is a disaster.  Mayfield had no time to throw - they had terrible guard and tackle play.  Then in comes a new coach and a new philosophy and he thrives.  He needed both the playing time and the scheme to develop and in Buffalo he was not going to get that.  
 

Do you honestly think if the Bills don’t trade him and they mange to put him on the PS that he develops the same way?

 

Maybe you do believe it, but based upon the fact that year 1 in Cleveland showed little - I think it is more likely that with the playing time, a new scheme, and improved coaching to focus on what he does best - allowed him to become a better version of himself and being 10th on a depth chart here was not changing that.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

Your exact words were "he doesn't have a good history against rookie QB's".

I can vouch for this... exact words that was posted. I attempted to engage in a conversation with him about it and didn't get a response if I remember right. I was there!!! Yay!! I was a part of something!!!

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...