Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, K-9 said:

Heinecke had no time most of the day, and that was with a play design that called for him to get rid of it quickly. Like I said, I’m not sure what game BF130 was watching. Sounds like he was just pissed that they couldn’t get Heinecke on the ground. Maybe he had the over 3 sack prop bet. 

D Line had pressure whole game. INTs were do to pressure 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, K-9 said:

It’s less a matter of opinion than it is a matter of understanding the game we all watched. But good for you, four people as clueless agree with you. 

Ok bud lol.

 

Have a good night 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

4 minutes ago, K-9 said:

It’s less a matter of opinion than it is a matter of understanding the game we all watched. But good for you, four people as clueless agree with you. 

 

I don't think that's really fair. I thought the D-front played pretty well, but they weren't soooo dominating (especially at the Ends) that there is no room for disagreement.

I will say that for the second week in a row, the Bills D administered a physical beating to an opposing QB. That dude is getting some tub time this week.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Simon said:

 

 

I don't think that's really fair. I thought the D-front played pretty well, but they weren't soooo dominating (especially at the Ends) that there is no room for disagreement.

OK, let me ask you the same question: did the Bills D line play well or not? 
 

If domination, read SACKS,  is the only measuring stick for success, then I suggest you adjust your expectations moving forward because domination is never the rule in this league on a week to week basis. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

I think he has caught every target this year so far 

 

He missed one today but it was pretty behind him.  Can't fault him for that one.

Posted

I thought they played well for the most part; interior pressure was a problem for Washington for much of the day. They also did so without a lot of help from scheming or extra rushers. And Heinecke took some serious bruises in the process.

But they weren't so dominant that I'd call people clueless that happened to not see it that way.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I thought this was neat..... the cameras showed Josh Allen's face in his first series and he  looked like a deer in spot lights at and then he looked like a hawk by half-time. He threw himself out of that slump. In the 2nd half he was the same 'ol Josh we know and love....

 

Allen is the most important Bill and we need Josh to be great for us to win the whole enchilada so of course, he gets my game ball.

 

Go Bills!

Posted
45 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

 

Too bad he lost out on an INT due to suspect call(s). Really solid game from him

Take some of that Edmunds money and give it to Taron....just to make LeGOATski twitch...

Posted
1 minute ago, Simon said:

I thought they played well for the most part; interior pressure was a problem for Washington for much of the day. They also did so without a lot of help from scheming or extra rushers. And Heinecke took some serious bruises in the process.

But they weren't so dominant that I'd call people clueless that happened to not see it that way.

But they had consistent pressure all game. Heinicke was never comfortable. He actually played decent considering. To say the D Line didn’t play well is ridiculous imo

Posted
15 minutes ago, BillsFan130 said:

No I don't think they played well.

 

Its all good. We are allowed to disagree.

 

Bills played great today and it was a great game

 

The line was collapsing the pocket all game long.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said:

But they had consistent pressure all game. Heinicke was never comfortable. He actually played decent considering. To say the D Line didn’t play well is ridiculous imo

I thought they got better as the game went along for sure, and by the second half that pressure was indeed consistent.

But I also remember thinking to myself at one point during the first half that I thought the Wash OLine was holding up surprisingly well.

Posted

It seemed like the DL was in the backfield quite a bit to me. Oliver blew up several plays, and it looked like WFT was holding on almost every snap.

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Simon said:

I thought they got better as the game went along for sure, and by the second half that pressure was indeed consistent.

But I also remember thinking to myself at one point during the first half that I thought the Wash OLine was holding up surprisingly well.

I will have to watch it again as we all have to do, especially considering the affects that liquor can have on a human brain, BUT, I do not expect to see (m)any plays Heinicke got to his third read because he had any time to throw. 

Posted
1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

Allen

knox

sanders

Tre white

milano

moss

beasley

dawkins

poyer

hyde

Bass

Glad you didn't include edmunds then I would of thought you were a homer

Posted

I was happy to see the pressure today from the DL. The two guards for Washington were enormous. We gave up 14 pts on a blitzing screen and a late garbage time td. I'm not counting that ridiculous kickoff where McKittrick froze like a scared deer. I don't require sacks as long as our 10 defensive players continue to fly around. It'll be 11 once Edmunds decides to show up.

×
×
  • Create New...