Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Jrb1979 said:

The Bills haven't looked that good so far either. They lost to mediocre Steelers team. The two teams they beat so far aren't very good. 

 

I don't care if the two wins are against Jax and Houston, 78-21 is 78-21.

 

You don't get to say TWO games don't count while ignoring the flukiest week that is week 1.

Edited by 1ManRaid
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Jrb1979 said:

The Bills haven't looked that good so far either. They lost to mediocre Steelers team. The two teams they beat so far aren't very good. 

 

Steelers played a perfect game and got a punt block to win. And we were in control of that game for that vast majority.

 

I don't put much stock in the first quarter of the year. Teams are still sorting things out many times. Bills will be 1 or 2 in the AFC when it's all said and done.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Posted
Just now, 1ManRaid said:

I actually want Miami to win.  We own them and don't want unbeaten teams in the AFC.


Raiders all the way.  Need KC as a wildcard team.   Miami loss helps with goal #1.  Win the East.

 

The Raiders will get their losses. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

On the 66 yard game winning FG. Why didn’t the Lions put their tallest, highest vertical guy in the center of the uprights, to try to knock down the ball should it be that close? Don’t think there’s anything against “goal tending” in the NFL, the kicks are usually so high it’s not realistic to swat them down.

Posted
1 minute ago, BillsfaninSB said:


Raiders all the way.  Need KC as a wildcard team.   Miami loss helps with goal #1.  Win the East.

 

The Raiders will get their losses. 

 

I thought bring the #1 seed would be goal #1, not worrying about wild card teams.

Posted
1 minute ago, JayBaller10 said:

On the 66 yard game winning FG. Why didn’t the Lions put their tallest, highest vertical guy in the center of the uprights, to try to knock down the ball should it be that close? Don’t think there’s anything against “goal tending” in the NFL, the kicks are usually so high it’s not realistic to swat them down.

Groot would've knocked it down.

Posted
1 minute ago, JayBaller10 said:

On the 66 yard game winning FG. Why didn’t the Lions put their tallest, highest vertical guy in the center of the uprights, to try to knock down the ball should it be that close? Don’t think there’s anything against “goal tending” in the NFL, the kicks are usually so high it’s not realistic to swat them down.

 

There is literally a rule against goaltending kicks at the goal posts.  Teams used to actually do that.

Posted
Just now, 1ManRaid said:

 

There is literally a rule against goaltending kicks at the goal posts.  Teams used to actually do that.

I was wondering if that was the case, it should be allowed if kicks are going to be that low.

Posted
1 minute ago, JayBaller10 said:

I was wondering if that was the case, it should be allowed if kicks are going to be that low.

 

Why SHOULD it be?  Just because?

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

The McCarron / Peterman thing was bad but they weren't planning on Josh to be entirely by himself from the get go.

It ended up as just peterman because they decided to trade away mccarron before the season started

Edited by YoloinOhio
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, 1ManRaid said:

 

Why SHOULD it be?  Just because?

It if can be blocked off the foot, why can't if be blocked at the goal? Not NBA rules for goal tending.

Edited by Coastie
Posted
6 minutes ago, Coastie said:

It if can be blocked off the foot, why can't if be blocked at the goal? Not NBA rules for goal tending.

 

Blocking a kick off the foot takes effort and skill.  Goaltending doesn't. 

×
×
  • Create New...