Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


Agreed. That was really textbook coverage. His back arm was touching the receiver’s back, but didn’t move the receiver. You have to reward that, not penalize it. 

 

On the replay he pulled the receivers arms and didn't play the ball. So it probably was PI

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Buffalo Bills Fan said:

 

Go for 3 points. Vs a good offense i'd debate (what situation makes sense)  to go for it.

 

Yeah I mean going for 3 makes sense too.  I just like to see some aggression in that position. 

3 minutes ago, dneveu said:

 

On the replay he pulled the receivers arms and didn't play the ball. So it probably was PI

 

Meh, he had his hand on the receivers arm as the ball went past the receiver.  To call PI the ball has to be catchable.  He wasn't going to catch that ball.

Edited by Scott7975
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, RaoulDuke79 said:

QB didn't run, why doesn't that get the same scrutiny for driving a QB into the ground as a standard pocket sack?

 

That was also a pretty nasty hit to the head.  I was kind of surprised no flag there.

Posted
27 minutes ago, DuckyBoys said:

 What were the schedule makers thinking even scheduling this doo doo fest on prime time

 

Every team gets a Thursday night game. Even the Jets.

 

Back in May when the schedule was released I'm sure Watson v. McCaffrey sounded alright.

×
×
  • Create New...