Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

 

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha time to dust of the ol war on liberal commie women playbook again.

 

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.............. imagine calling the people that would like you to not kill babies both unborn and born (made to feel comfortable first), sick pucks.

 

Imagine being that evil.  

 

Imagine being this evil - you don't care about life

 

image.thumb.jpeg.9dbb7112b0f2b5955b872c08bf722ecb.jpeg

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Ok what is it? 

enlighten the audience and stop hiding by arguing a point literally conceded in the very same post. 

 

You have adequately demonstrated zero understanding of how often women miss their periods and some of the common whys (your first and only suggested reason being menopause: hilarious). 

Edited by Sundancer
Posted
5 minutes ago, Sundancer said:

 

You have adequately demonstrated zero understanding of how often women miss their periods and some of the common whys (your first and only suggested reason being menopause: hilarious). 

 

You keep harping on the same point.
 

It’s been acknowledged your extreme expertise would add tremendous value to this board, if only we could draw it out 😞 
 

So I’ll put you down for 39 weeks?

Posted
2 hours ago, Governor said:

I will now spread my socialist seed throughout Texas to secure electoral victory.

That’s along the lines of my guess, why this, why now?  They are probably trying to stop the influx of Californian coming into their state.

 

topic aside it’s really interesting how the law was crafted.  No state penalties fines or charges, it just allows private citizens to sue the clinics. I guess that’s why it was the clinics organizing and appealing to the Supreme Court, this could really hurt their revenues and increase operational risk.

Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

That’s along the lines of my guess, why this, why now?  They are probably trying to stop the influx of Californian coming into their state.

 

topic aside it’s really interesting how the law was crafted.  No state penalties fines or charges, it just allows private citizens to sue the clinics. I guess that’s why it was the clinics organizing and appealing to the Supreme Court, this could really hurt their revenues and increase operational risk.

It will get overturned. This is just Abbott trying out out-DeSantis DeSantis. None of their laws/orders hold up.

 

Ron’s 5k vaccine order won’t hold either. 
 

I should be able to sue parents for having to look at their ugly kids.
 

We should have a similar law for guns also. If I hear that you may own a gun, I’ll sue you.

 

Texas just showed us how to get guns off the street.

Edited by Governor
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Imagine being this evil - you don't care about life

 

image.thumb.jpeg.9dbb7112b0f2b5955b872c08bf722ecb.jpeg

 

 

 

 

Your racism on full display.  

 

Why are you posting pictures of only white kids?  

 

Because you don't care about the black or brown kids.  

 

What an awful human you are.   

 

Racist and low info.  

Edited by Big Blitz
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

 

 

Your racism on full display.  

 

Where are you posting pictures of only white kids?  

 

Because you don't care about the black or brown kids.  

 

What an awful human you are.   

 

Racist and low info.  


Pathetic as usual - making jokes about the massacre of children.

 

You are sick. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

That’s along the lines of my guess, why this, why now?  They are probably trying to stop the influx of Californian coming into their state.

 

topic aside it’s really interesting how the law was crafted.  No state penalties fines or charges, it just allows private citizens to sue the clinics. I guess that’s why it was the clinics organizing and appealing to the Supreme Court, this could really hurt their revenues and increase operational risk.

So the Texas law is using the private sector to do the dirty work?  Where I wonder did they come up with that idea?  Sounds to me the thinking is along the lines of the way the Fed's are using private businesses to enforce vaccine mandates. 

Although I have no strong opinion on the abortion issue I disapprove of the use of the private sector tactic in both cases but I suspect a lot of people that are having fits about the abortion legislation have no issue with enforcing vaccine mandate in a similar manner or visa versa. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

 

 

Your racism on full display.  

 

Where are you posting pictures of only white kids?  

 

Because you don't care about the black or brown kids.  

 

What an awful human you are.   

 

Racist and low info.  

So his his bestie governor...probably friendless empty disgusting human beings in real life as well.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

As an outsider to the debate of abortion, I have questions.

What is the difference between the Texas right wing religious sects, who are restricting woman's rights and the ISIS/Taliban, who in the name of religion have extreme restrictions on woman's rights.

Seems to me, quite similar, except of course the Texas step is limited today. So far hair style not restricted, or tattoos, or education rights, but!

 

Religion and successful government only results in restrictions. The supporters of these Texas initiatives likely resist masks to safe children's lives.

 

Very strange partnership, only possible using religion as the basis.

  • Agree 1
Posted

What a drag...no matter what side of the abortion issue you are on -  the law as structured is clearly unconstititonal. We have an unhinged Scotus....its too bad...thanks Mitch - you got what you wanted. This is clearly the biggest risk to the republic right now..

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, TH3 said:

What a drag...no matter what side of the abortion issue you are on -  the law as structured is clearly unconstititonal. We have an unhinged Scotus....its too bad...thanks Mitch - you got what you wanted. This is clearly the biggest risk to the republic right now..

Whut? Now it’s scoutus? Last week it was another thing. Can’t you people fixate on one boogeyman man at a time?

 

How could you forget the deadly insurrection? 

Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:

As an outsider to the debate of abortion, I have questions.

What is the difference between the Texas right wing religious sects, who are restricting woman's rights and the ISIS/Taliban, who in the name of religion have extreme restrictions on woman's rights.

Seems to me, quite similar, except of course the Texas step is limited today. So far hair style not restricted, or tattoos, or education rights, but!

 

Religion and successful government only results in restrictions. The supporters of these Texas initiatives likely resist masks to safe children's lives.

 

Very strange partnership, only possible using religion as the basis.


This is the same logic that gets me so fed up with the political party’s. You aren’t wrong about these connections.

 

Here’s another one.  What’s the difference between vaccine mandates and abortion bans. The protesters on the right side of the one issue have the same signs as the left side of the other….  
 

I can’t see how you’re for one against the other or Vice versa. it makes no dam sense at all, and just shows many humans are just irrational sheep following the herd.
 

 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
57 minutes ago, TSOL said:

Trainwreck thread of the year, right here folks 

 

 

 

I do like seeing a group of men, some with no understanding of female biology like @Over 29 years of fanhood, discuss abortion. And no, I'm not saying that men should have no say but I am saying that it's always funny to watch a group of all males do it.  

  • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...