Tiberius Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 https://www.politico.com/news/2021/09/01/supreme-court-texas-abortion-ban-508275 Quote The Supreme Court early Wednesday let a Texas state law take effect that allows private citizens to sue to uphold a ban on the procedure after six weeks of pregnancy, potentially creating a new template for states to impose strict restrictions on the procedure. The court’s decision to not act on an emergency petition from Texas abortion clinics comes as the justices prepare to more broadly reconsider the right to an abortion it established almost 50 years ago. In May, justices agreed to review Mississippi’s ban on the procedure after 15 weeks of pregnancy — a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision that legalized abortion nationwide. Those arguments are expected later this year, with a ruling in 2022.
unbillievable Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 The law is still under review and won't be argued in the Supreme Court until 2022. The headline (as always) is misleading. 2
TSOL Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 6 minutes ago, unbillievable said: The law is still under review and won't be argued in the Supreme Court until 2022. The headline (as always) is misleading. Well, in true liberal progressive fashion, he did throw the "basically" disclaimer in there 1
BillStime Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 51 minutes ago, Tiberius said: https://www.politico.com/news/2021/09/01/supreme-court-texas-abortion-ban-508275 As Texas continues to turn blue - this won’t last. Besides - it won’t stop one abortion - this is nothing more than red meat for the pigs. 1
Boatdrinks Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 37 minutes ago, TSOL said: Well, in true liberal progressive fashion, he did throw the "basically" disclaimer in there Right. Just as having to show ID makes it basically too difficult to vote, etc.
TSOL Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 2 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: Right. Just as having to show ID makes it basically too difficult to vote, etc. I have a good one Trump basically kills 800,000 people Thats one of my favorites 1
Tiberius Posted September 1, 2021 Author Posted September 1, 2021 8 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: Right. Just as having to show ID makes it basically too difficult to vote, etc. You guys are so corrupt.
TSOL Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You guys are so corrupt. "Basically" corrupt 4 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You guys are so corrupt. What’s the problem you see here?
Tiberius Posted September 1, 2021 Author Posted September 1, 2021 56 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: What’s the problem you see here? Complaining about voting, making it harder to vote and then turning around and saying its about IDs when its not. 1 hour ago, TSOL said: "Basically" corrupt Basically you are a D-bag 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Complaining about voting, making it harder to vote and then turning around and saying its about IDs when its not. Oh, you have concerns about the security of our elections, and ensuring that our process is fair and just. Get in line, it seems everyone has those concerns, oddly, after the most ultra-secure and really really cool election in the history of peopleness. I thought you had issues with this particular case in Texas.
Tiberius Posted September 1, 2021 Author Posted September 1, 2021 7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Oh, you have concerns about the security of our elections, and ensuring that our process is fair and just. Get in line, it seems everyone has those concerns, oddly, after the most ultra-secure and really really cool election in the history of peopleness. I thought you had issues with this particular case in Texas. So glad it was a fair election in 2020. Those sore losers that couldn't accept the results ran off to make it harder to vote. Won't work. Won't work 2
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: So glad it was a fair election in 2020. Those sore losers that couldn't accept the results ran off to make it harder to vote. Won't work. Won't work If it 'won't work', whatcha'all upset about? All this dialogue is what makes us stronger as a nation.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 2 hours ago, unbillievable said: The law is still under review and won't be argued in the Supreme Court until 2022. The headline (as always) is misleading. But we want to be outraged now!!
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 (edited) By the way does it really take more than 6 weeks to realize you missed your period and decide you don’t want to be a parent? I guess to be fair the people who don’t have that sorted out by may not be stellar at parenting either. I sure wish some science or data could be framed around the argument. Projecting religious beliefs just don’t make sense. I gotta admit I saw a lot of antivaxers with a my body my choice signs, so there might be some common ground. Edited September 1, 2021 by Over 29 years of fanhood
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 2 hours ago, 716er said: Shithole state Coming from a 716er I’d say kettle meet pot
Doc Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 Not a fan of this. I've always said it should be legal until the end of the 2nd trimester. 1
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 4 minutes ago, Doc said: Not a fan of this. I've always said it should be legal until the end of the 2nd trimester. that’s the sciency part I wonder about. Is there a way to have a demarcation most people can agree with based on some scientific approach
Recommended Posts