Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 https://www.politico.com/news/2021/09/01/supreme-court-texas-abortion-ban-508275 Quote The Supreme Court early Wednesday let a Texas state law take effect that allows private citizens to sue to uphold a ban on the procedure after six weeks of pregnancy, potentially creating a new template for states to impose strict restrictions on the procedure. The court’s decision to not act on an emergency petition from Texas abortion clinics comes as the justices prepare to more broadly reconsider the right to an abortion it established almost 50 years ago. In May, justices agreed to review Mississippi’s ban on the procedure after 15 weeks of pregnancy — a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision that legalized abortion nationwide. Those arguments are expected later this year, with a ruling in 2022. Expand
unbillievable Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 The law is still under review and won't be argued in the Supreme Court until 2022. The headline (as always) is misleading. 2
TSOL Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 4:05 PM, unbillievable said: The law is still under review and won't be argued in the Supreme Court until 2022. The headline (as always) is misleading. Expand Well, in true liberal progressive fashion, he did throw the "basically" disclaimer in there 1
BillStime Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 3:26 PM, Tiberius said: https://www.politico.com/news/2021/09/01/supreme-court-texas-abortion-ban-508275 Expand As Texas continues to turn blue - this won’t last. Besides - it won’t stop one abortion - this is nothing more than red meat for the pigs. 1
Boatdrinks Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 4:13 PM, TSOL said: Well, in true liberal progressive fashion, he did throw the "basically" disclaimer in there Expand Right. Just as having to show ID makes it basically too difficult to vote, etc.
TSOL Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 4:52 PM, Boatdrinks said: Right. Just as having to show ID makes it basically too difficult to vote, etc. Expand I have a good one Trump basically kills 800,000 people Thats one of my favorites 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 1, 2021 Author Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 4:52 PM, Boatdrinks said: Right. Just as having to show ID makes it basically too difficult to vote, etc. Expand You guys are so corrupt.
TSOL Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 5:02 PM, Tiberius said: You guys are so corrupt. Expand "Basically" corrupt 4 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 5:02 PM, Tiberius said: You guys are so corrupt. Expand What’s the problem you see here?
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 1, 2021 Author Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 5:13 PM, leh-nerd skin-erd said: What’s the problem you see here? Expand Complaining about voting, making it harder to vote and then turning around and saying its about IDs when its not. On 9/1/2021 at 5:11 PM, TSOL said: "Basically" corrupt Expand Basically you are a D-bag 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 6:11 PM, Tiberius said: Complaining about voting, making it harder to vote and then turning around and saying its about IDs when its not. Expand Oh, you have concerns about the security of our elections, and ensuring that our process is fair and just. Get in line, it seems everyone has those concerns, oddly, after the most ultra-secure and really really cool election in the history of peopleness. I thought you had issues with this particular case in Texas.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 1, 2021 Author Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 6:20 PM, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Oh, you have concerns about the security of our elections, and ensuring that our process is fair and just. Get in line, it seems everyone has those concerns, oddly, after the most ultra-secure and really really cool election in the history of peopleness. I thought you had issues with this particular case in Texas. Expand So glad it was a fair election in 2020. Those sore losers that couldn't accept the results ran off to make it harder to vote. Won't work. Won't work 2
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 6:28 PM, Tiberius said: So glad it was a fair election in 2020. Those sore losers that couldn't accept the results ran off to make it harder to vote. Won't work. Won't work Expand If it 'won't work', whatcha'all upset about? All this dialogue is what makes us stronger as a nation.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 4:05 PM, unbillievable said: The law is still under review and won't be argued in the Supreme Court until 2022. The headline (as always) is misleading. Expand But we want to be outraged now!!
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 (edited) By the way does it really take more than 6 weeks to realize you missed your period and decide you don’t want to be a parent? I guess to be fair the people who don’t have that sorted out by may not be stellar at parenting either. I sure wish some science or data could be framed around the argument. Projecting religious beliefs just don’t make sense. I gotta admit I saw a lot of antivaxers with a my body my choice signs, so there might be some common ground. Edited September 1, 2021 by Over 29 years of fanhood
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 3:55 PM, 716er said: Shithole state Expand Coming from a 716er I’d say kettle meet pot
Doc Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 Not a fan of this. I've always said it should be legal until the end of the 2nd trimester. 1
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 6:54 PM, Doc said: Not a fan of this. I've always said it should be legal until the end of the 2nd trimester. Expand that’s the sciency part I wonder about. Is there a way to have a demarcation most people can agree with based on some scientific approach
Recommended Posts