Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Rocky Landing said:

It's a shame we don't play them until December. It would be nice to get an early crack at the rook.

I actually prefer getting them after there’s game tape down of what they’re doing with him.

  • Agree 2
Posted

I'm probably not the 1st to say this, but I really can't wait until Belichick retires.

 

Not saying Jones or the offseason moves will work out for them - but every move was as smart as it could be.  He's just a coach who doesn't stand for losing & will not tolerate it.

 

Posted

BB to unvaxxed players: “Even if you’re a borderline starter, you’re too much of an availability liability under NFL rules to take up a roster spot on this team. I can’t afford to have players miss games because of a ‘close contact’ or missed test. Cam is your poster child.”

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Success said:

I'm probably not the 1st to say this, but I really can't wait until Belichick retires.

 

Not saying Jones or the offseason moves will work out for them - but every move was as smart as it could be.  He's just a coach who doesn't stand for losing & will not tolerate it.

 

No I hope he stays and gets his A$$ handed to him by Josh for as long as possible ,I want to see some more of those phones flying , same with Brady I hope he loses couple of SB’s to Josh before he retires as well ,, 

 

Edited by Putin
Posted
1 minute ago, Success said:

I'm probably not the 1st to say this, but I really can't wait until Belichick retires.

 

Not saying Jones or the offseason moves will work out for them - but every move was as smart as it could be.  He's just a coach who doesn't stand for losing & will not tolerate it.

 

 

Yes, so much so that  even at times can "misinterpret" the rules.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, JGMcD2 said:

Dolphins 26 vs. Bills 56

January 3rd, 2021

 
Tua Tagovailoa

35/58 (60%)

361 Yards

1 TD

3 INT

1 Sk

62.5 Rating

 

Chargers 17 vs. Bills 27

November 29th, 2020

 

Justin Herbert

31/52 (60%)

316 Yards

1 TD

1 INT 

3 Sk

75.5 Rating

 

Bills 17 vs. Steelers 10 

December 15th, 2019

 

Devlin Hodges

23/38 (61%) 

202 Yards 

1 TD

4 INT

4 Sk

43.9 Rating 


Broncos 3 vs. Bills 20

November 24th, 2019 

 

Brandon Allen

10/25 (40%)

82 Yards 

0 TD

1 INT

4 Sk

32.4 Rating


Jets 27 vs. Bills 23 

December 9th, 2018

 

Sam Darnold 

16/22 (73%)

170 Yards

1 TD

1 INT 

0 Sk

83.7 Rating

 

Rookie QBs against McDermott in Buffalo…

 

1-4 

59% Completion 

226.2 Y/G

4 TDs

10 INT

12 Sk

59.6 Rating 

Rookie QBs against Belichick in New England…

 

6-21 (.222)

56% Completion 

196.8 Y/G 

23 TD (.85/G)

40 INT (1.5/G)

60 Sk (2.22/G)

69.8 Rating


 

Rookie QBs against McDermott in Buffalo…

 

1-5 (.167)

60.3% Completion 

212.5 Y/G

4 TDs (.67/G)

10 INT (1.67/G)

16 Sk (2.67/G)

64.0 Rating 

 

@Royale with Cheese

@Giuseppe Tognarelli
 

EDIT:

 

Shoot! I forgot the WFT game from 2019. Going to add that to McDermott’s total in this post! 

Edited by JGMcD2
Posted
1 hour ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Tore them up and... still lost 31-21?

 

Teams will put up yards on us. The key though is how many points they actually end up with. Good luck keeping up with the Bills Offense.


The Bills were one Tre White goal line interception from being down 21-9 in the third quarter. The game was also closer than the final score indicated, due to Micah Hyde's onside kick run-back.

Fitzpatrick can get hot on any given Sunday and pile up yards and touchdowns. That's all I'm saying. We've all seen it happen, and we all know it CAN happen. Pairing him with what should be a killer Washington defense makes that game not necessarily a gimme. I'm still picking the Bills, but if the subject is "QBs who the Bills won't necessarily pound into dust", I'd include Fitz.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Logic said:


The Bills were one Tre White goal line interception from being down 21-9 in the third quarter. The game was also closer than the final score indicated, due to Micah Hyde's onside kick run-back.

Fitzpatrick can get hot on any given Sunday and pile up yards and touchdowns. That's all I'm saying. We've all seen it happen, and we all know it CAN happen. Pairing him with what should be a killer Washington defense makes that game not necessarily a gimme. I'm still picking the Bills, but if the subject is "QBs who the Bills won't necessarily pound into dust", I'd include Fitz.

I agree the game against WFT will not be a cake walk  , that defense and especially front 7 is for real , I’m glad it’s a home game 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, MAJBobby said:

Asante Samuel not holding back

Ok without Montana, Bill Walsh is just another Coach. The simple fact is Brady wouldn’t exist without BB. (6th rounders rarely make a team) and BB wouldn’t be who he is without Brady. They both needed eachother. Jesus  think be easy for people see. Lol

 

PS. Asante all you had to do was catch that INT in the SB and we are 7 time SB Champion, as was as an UNDEFEATED Season. So with all the respect in the world “please sit down and shut the heck up!”

Edited by PatsFanNH
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

Tua? LOL. Really!!?? Herbert I'll give you, but he gave a lot of teams a tough time. But Tua, yeah credibility went out the window there lol

you misunderstood me. I was just saying those were the only 2 rookies we played last year and we "did ok". Which was a coy way of saying Im not worried about rookies.

Posted
2 minutes ago, PatsFanNH said:

Ok without Montana, Bill Walsh is just another Coach. The simple fact is Brady wouldn’t exist without BB. (6th rounders rarely make a team) and BB wouldn’t be who he is without Brady. They both needed eachother. Jesus  think be easy for people see. Lol

Really?  Seemed he did Fine with a Steve Young as well

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, jletha said:

you misunderstood me. I was just saying those were the only 2 rookies we played last year and we "did ok". Which was a coy way of saying Im not worried about rookies.

Tua has the most complete team around him including weapons on O. If he fails make the leap this year they may need find new QB.  Ugh Imagine if the get Watson with THAT team.. ugh

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, PatsFanNH said:

Ok without Montana, Bill Walsh is just another Coach. The simple fact is Brady wouldn’t exist without BB. (6th rounders rarely make a team) and BB wouldn’t be who he is without Brady. They both needed eachother. Jesus  think be easy for people see. Lol

Thing is, he is absolutely right though. Although I would say BB is better than your average HC. In regards to the bold here, I disagree. I'd say it's more like without Bledsoe getting "boom shaka locka-ed" giving Brady a chance. If that would not have happened, I think Brady would have still done great, but would have been years later.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, MAJBobby said:

Really?  Seemed he did Fine with a Steve Young as well

Really!? I believe it was Seifert not Walsh who won a SB with Young.  I mean BB did fine his one year without Brady in 2008 went 11-5.  Last year was more than just no Brady, the team lacked talent EVERYWHERE!

1 minute ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

Thing is, he is absolutely right though. Although I would say BB is better than your average HC. In regards to the bold here, I disagree. I'd say it's more like without Bledsoe getting "boom shaka locka-ed" giving Brady a chance. If that would not have happened, I think Brady would have still done great, but would have been years later.

I agree! I think 2 years later since if I remember right Bledsoe just signed a huge deal as well. 

Posted
Just now, PatsFanNH said:

Really!? I believe it was Seifert not Walsh who won a SB with Young.  I mean BB did fine his one year without Brady in 2008 went 11-5.  Last year was more than just no Brady, the team lacked talent EVERYWHERE!

 

Listening to 98.5 The Sports Hub today. Sounds like the Patriots found their new Tom Brady. Already making playoff plans.

  • Vomit 1
  • Shocked 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, jletha said:

you misunderstood me. I was just saying those were the only 2 rookies we played last year and we "did ok". Which was a coy way of saying Im not worried about rookies.

? I'm confused as to what you're talking about. Did you get mixed up and quote me by accident? Lol

Posted
1 minute ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

Listening to 98.5 The Sports Hub today. Sounds like the Patriots found their new Tom Brady. Already making playoff plans.

I think the Pats were a playoff team even if Newton had started the year as QB.  I don’t think anyone thinks their SB contenders, but a playoff team? Ya I can see it. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, PatsFanNH said:

Really!? I believe it was Seifert not Walsh who won a SB with Young.  I mean BB did fine his one year without Brady in 2008 went 11-5.  Last year was more than just no Brady, the team lacked talent EVERYWHERE!

I agree! I think 2 years later since if I remember right Bledsoe just signed a huge deal as well. 

Again Walsh did FINE with Young.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, PatsFanNH said:

I agree! I think 2 years later since if I remember right Bledsoe just signed a huge deal as well.

Hard to guess how long, but at some point he would have got a shot. Most back-up QB,s get their shot at some point or other. Some can take years, some can early.

×
×
  • Create New...