Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No idea why he has Hodgins making the team. 
 

No idea why he’s only keeping 2 TEs, 1 of which is Gilliam.

 

T Jones is close to a lock to make the team. Breida is closer to being cut than Jones IMO 


Not so sure Tommy Doyle makes the team either.

 

  • Agree 4
Posted
Just now, Bangarang said:

No idea why he has Hodgins making the team. 
 

No idea why he’s only keeping 2 TEs, 1 of which is Gilliam.

 

T Jones is close to a lock to make the team. Breida is closer to being cut than Jones IMO 


Not so sure Tommy Doyle makes the team either.

 

Yeah not really feeling his 53 prediction. Definitely some head scratchers in there.

  • Agree 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Bangarang said:

Not so sure Tommy Doyle makes the team either.

He has to!

NFL rules:  Every team shall have a player whose name sounds like he's direct from the auld sod.  It's right after the policies regarding conditional draft picks.

Posted

With Phillips injured, I question our ability to stop the run. Should Beane be looking for a stout DT to shore up our interior?

Ed, Star, Vernon and Justin. Not the greatest collection of run stoppers you ever saw.

It looks worrisome to me....

 

Could Beane surprise us and claim a DT?

I would it exciting if we kept 8 WRs. I think we are going to need them. 

Posted
39 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said:

That context changes alot.  

 

Agree on Harry, not sure about McKenzie to IR based on his comments today.

 

If Joe had to pick 1 player to resign, who would it be?  

 

I'd clearly go with Hollister, but we will see.

 Isaiah Hodgins, would be my guess.

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, billybrew1 said:

With Phillips injured, I question our ability to stop the run. Should Beane be looking for a stout DT to shore up our interior?

Ed, Star, Vernon and Justin. Not the greatest collection of run stoppers you ever saw.

It looks worrisome to me....

 

Could Beane surprise us and claim a DT?

I would it exciting if we kept 8 WRs. I think we are going to need them. 

Phillips will be back or they would. 

Posted
51 minutes ago, Brennan Huff said:

8 wide receivers is a lot

Agreed... Hard to see Hodgins be valued more than Hollister.    Hollister has been on three  3 NFL teams

Posted
52 minutes ago, Lagoon Blues said:

I just dont see Dawson Knox, Reggie Gilliam being the only TE's on the roster.

 

I don't either...I think one of the WRs ends up on IR to "stash" him

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, uninja said:

Two TE's on the active roster? No Jacob Hollister? 8 WRs?

 

This list is sus.

Hollister is going to be signed when some players go to IR per Joe....

57 minutes ago, SCBills said:

Did he just forget about Hollister?.. not even on the PS if clears waivers?  
 

 

 See right above your comment.....precisely what happens....

Edited by Kwai San
Posted
8 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

Joe's roster reads more like who he'd like to see make it rather than who he thinks the Bills will. 

 

If all you did were to read the roster and not the story I can easily see your point.  If you read the story and his reasoning it is sound and makes a lot of sense.  That coupled with the fact he gets the eye test almost each and every day AND gets to talk to the players and coaches he has a much better feel for who should be in and show might be out than the average TBD'er.  Just saying......

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

No way they only keep Knox and Gilliam at TE. 

Dont see Jake Kumerow, Marquez Stevenson, Isaiah Hodgins all making the roster. One or tow of them max.

LB Dodson is making the team

 

Side note - He doesnt even have Fromm on practice squad. Some out there think he has trade value...

Edited by ngbills
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said:

Were you able to read the whole article?

I didn't myself. I mean thread was about his 53 man prediction that was listed without having to click link. Was it a 2nd prediction on the linked article or something? 

Edited by Sheneneh Jenkins
Posted
2 minutes ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

I didn't myself. I mean thread was about his 53 man prediction that was listed without having to click link. Was it a 2nd prediction on the linked article or something? 

Yeah he actually has some creative moves that Beane may use to save some talent.

Posted
1 minute ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said:

Yeah he actually has some creative moves that Beane may use to save some talent.

Ok that's cool . I was just looking at what his final 53 was and didn't have to click link for that.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Kwai San said:

 

If all you did were to read the roster and not the story I can easily see your point.  If you read the story and his reasoning it is sound and makes a lot of sense.  That coupled with the fact he gets the eye test almost each and every day AND gets to talk to the players and coaches he has a much better feel for who should be in and show might be out than the average TBD'er.  Just saying......

 

That's the problem with posting articles that need a sub. A lot of people don't have a sub, so when the story is behind the paywall, all they see is the roster and there are def some questions marks that need explaining.

 

His reasoning with some of the omissions is that they can Andre Roberts them, ie handshake deal after another player hits IR.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Dodson needs to be on the roster with the way Milano always gets injured.  We need 6 LBs.  At one point last year, I think we had 7 or 8.

 

Hodgins doesn't need to be on this team.  I don't get the obsession with him.

 

Doyle doesn't deserve to be on team.

 

Those are not super bowl caliber CBs.  Scary thin.

 

How did he write this roster with 1 TE on it.

×
×
  • Create New...