Jump to content

Comparison to 90s SB teams


Recommended Posts

The 90's squad had several hall of famers , this group has a ways to go but the potential looks to be there. The 90's squad had more star players while this team has more depth 1-53. To compare I'd say this team is like the 1988-90 version...Just on the door step made AFC championship but lost to the Icky Wood's Bengals. Let's pray this year isn't like 89 when that Ronnie Harmon drop ended our season. 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Craig Oi said:

The 90's squad had several hall of famers , this group has a ways to go but the potential looks to be there. The 90's squad had more star players while this team has more depth 1-53. To compare I'd say this team is like the 1988-90 version...Just on the door step made AFC championship but lost to the Icky Wood's Bengals. Let's pray this year isn't like 89 when that Ronnie Harmon drop ended our season. 

 

 

I think its hard to compare from different era's. Back in the 90's teams could play defense. Today if you sneeze on a player its a 15 yard unnecessary roughness penalty. Right now the 90's teams get the nod because of what they accomplished. But if this group can win a Super Bowl than that changes everything.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

8 minutes ago, Greg S said:

 

I think its hard to compare from different era's. Back in the 90's teams could play defense. Today if you sneeze on a player its a 15 yard unnecessary roughness penalty. Right now the 90's teams get the nod because of what they accomplished. But if this group can win a Super Bowl than that changes everything.

 

5 minutes ago, Rico said:

Totally different eras. I will say though that I’m taking McD over Marv.

I have to agree with this but for arguments sake I thought I'd give it a stab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With today's rules, today's team is better.  With the rules then the 90's team would demolish this team.   Both teams were deep but the 90's team has superior high end talent.  But on the other hand the players might have not been as dedicated off the field and drank more than they should have, especially before the Giants SB.  Again though some of that is the rise of sports science.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team feels like the Bledsoe team after they picked up Takeo.

The offense was good and the defense had just gotten a revamp... but then the O disappeared and the D was #2 in the league.

 

We're hoping it's more like '88-'89 than early 2000's

 

The 90's team would kill this one with 90's rules. Today's rules would make it close.

Edited by unbillievable
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at D, it’s hard to argue against any team with Bruce, and Biscuit would still be a stud… but Jeff Wright would get annihilated, and there are plenty of others like Conlan and Kelso that just couldn’t hang today.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

4 minutes ago, Rico said:

Looking at D, it’s hard to argue against any team with Bruce, and Biscuit would still be a stud… but Jeff Wright would get annihilated, and there are plenty of others like Conlan and Kelso that just couldn’t hang today.

Bruce was out of this world. I never fully appreciated him at the time. That being said, I think today’s team would easily beat the 90’s team. Talent, training, and coaching is just so much better these days. Our 90’s defense seemed good, but they got annihilated in four Super Bowls. I think Josh Allen has his way with them if Mark Rypien could. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arguments between eras is always fun, but so so so subjective. Overall I feel like I’d prefer the majority of the 90’s roster starters to our own now, but the gap is narrowing fast, and this may be the year that changes for me, imo. 
 

But really people, we’re being asked to choose between great pizza and more great pizza, so really no wrong answers…

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until we get to at least one SB I would tap the brakes on the 90's bills comparisons. If anything that team right now is the Chiefs since they are currently the kings of the AFC until proven otherwise.

 

One thing I will say, if Rousseau ends up coming out of nowhere and being a dominant DE in the coming years we'll be one step closer to the 90's bills with our new Bruce Smith type player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elite QB? Check

Elite WR? Check

WR depth? Check

RB's? 90's all day

TE? Edge 90's

OL? I think they're about even, outside of us not having a Kent Hull

DL? We have no Bruce or Biscuit, but I like our group. Edge 90's

LB's? Check

CB's? Our CB depth on those 90's teams was better than ours now

S's? I'd take Poyer and Hyde

K? Absolutely check. Bass-o-matic

ST? Hard to say

 

If Rousseau does in the Regular Season what he's doing right now? Man, everything will look better. LB's, Secondary, it will open up more opportunities for TO's if QB's are having to rush throws. It will also force some sacks Hughes' way as well because of the pressure from the other side. Epenesa looks better. Hopefully Addison has a stronger campaign than last year. Oliver seems to be getting after it. We've all heard the reports about Star. We could really be there in the end hoisting the Lombardi. Right now I'd liken us to the Peyton Manning led Colts who had to get past the Patriots. The Chiefs are in that Patriots role now days. Still, this team feels different than those 90's teams. They are a closer knit group imo and I really feel like we will finally get it done, bring one home to Buffalo.  

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, unbillievable said:

Get to One Superbowl and we can start to comparisons.

 

Win a Superbowl and we can end the discussion.

 

They win a Super Bowl then immediately become the best team the Bills had during the Super Bowl era. Before my time and the game was much different then but they would be on the same level as the 64 & 65 AFL champions. Those teams will have been the only teams to win a championship for Buffalo.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take the 90s Bills.  I think they're built to beat the current team.  You beat this Bills team by running it down their throat and making them run the ball on offense.  Don't think this current team would take advantage of the small 90's defensive line or be able to stop Thurman and Kenny Davis from running the ball like crazy.  Just my opinion.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...