Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
5 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

It was on July 20, 2021 when I started this thread.

 

But I guess to a "vaccine scientist" the facts on the ground never change.

And in 2021 it was clearly immoral and it has been shown to be poor from a scientific position since then. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

And in 2021 it was clearly immoral and it has been shown to be poor from a scientific position since then. 

Immoral? Of course not. Just as getting the measles vaccine for your kids is the only moral course of action today.

I was taught (in Catholic schools, no less) that we should also be concerned about our fellow men, women, and children.

But I guess the Christian party has forgotten all about that?

Posted (edited)

This vaccine scientist has always had the same stance since I was getting vaccine patents and publishing in peer reviewed scientific journals two decades ago....

 

It's never been time to MANDATE vaccines.

 

 

Edited by BillsFanNC
Posted
8 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Immoral? Of course not. Just as getting the measles vaccine for your kids is the only moral course of action today.

I was taught (in Catholic schools, no less) that we should also be concerned about our fellow men, women, and children.

But I guess the Christian party has forgotten all about that?

Forcing children to get a experimental medicine that has virtually no benefit to children to help the elderly is immoral. At the point that this discussion was occurring the majority  of our population had already had it and were better off with their natural immunity than anything they got from the shots. Their is nothing similar to COVID and measles, COVID is endemic and a threat to the elderly, measles is most dangerous to children. Protecting children from a childhood illness is a proper discussion, protecting old people at the cost of children is not similar. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...