Doc Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 That's it! Ashli Babbitt was the mastermind behind the otherwise eventual overthrow of the government and Michael Byrd saved the country. What a hero!
SectionC3 Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 5 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: So your qualifying the definition of a terrorists now? And you are now on record is being ok with the on site execution of American citizens? Stick to the subject, Chef Jim Crow. You fellas seems to like terrorists a lot. I’m just curious which other terrorists you like. Is it the Unabomber? Maybe the Shoe Bomber guy? You guys might want to get baseball/terrorist cards made so you can trade them amongst each other. Like, you could trade a Unambomber rookie for a Babbitt. Might be cool. Give it a shot. 1
Chef Jim Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 Just now, SectionC3 said: Stick to the subject, Chef Jim Crow. You fellas seems to like terrorists a lot. I’m just curious which other terrorists you like. Is it the Unabomber? Maybe the Shoe Bomber guy? You guys might want to get baseball/terrorist cards made so you can trade them amongst each other. Like, you could trade a Unambomber rookie for a Babbitt. Might be cool. Give it a shot. Nope. Not playing your game. Are there specific government buildings being attacked you're good with a shoot on site directive? The Capitol is obviously ok. What about municipal law enforcement buildings? Are those a green light for shoot on site?
Doc Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 The police could have had a field day shooting "terrorists" all last summer. Looks like they missed their chance...
Chef Jim Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 3 minutes ago, Doc said: The police could have had a field day shooting "terrorists" all last summer. Looks like they missed their chance... Not so faster there Doc. We have yet to hear from our resident terrorist expert @SectionC3 regarding what constitutes a terrorists that can be shot on site by police. So far we have established that breaking into the Capitol is an exterminate at all costs target. We wait his legal opinion if there are any other buildings that have a shoot on site mandate. Stay tuned............
Doc Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 Just now, Chef Jim said: Not so faster there Doc. We have yet to hear from our resident terrorist expert @SectionC3 regarding what constitutes a terrorists that can be shot on site by police. So far we have established that breaking into the Capitol is an exterminate at all costs target. We wait his legal opinion if there are any other buildings that have a shoot on site mandate. Stay tuned............ Doesn't matter. We've changed the definitions of "insurrection" and "terrorist" and even what it is someone has to do to be (worse than) Hitler or for an event to be worse than the Civil War or 9/11. Might as well go down the idiot road with them...
Chef Jim Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 1 minute ago, Doc said: Doesn't matter. We've changed the definitions of "insurrection" and "terrorist" and even what it is someone has to do to be (worse than) Hitler or for an event to be worse than the Civil War or 9/11. Might as well go down the idiot road with them... Not to mention you'll get shot if you climb the WH fence.
Beach Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 she didnt identify as a terrorist. doesnt that matter anymore?
SectionC3 Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 41 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Not so faster there Doc. We have yet to hear from our resident terrorist expert @SectionC3 regarding what constitutes a terrorists that can be shot on site by police. So far we have established that breaking into the Capitol is an exterminate at all costs target. We wait his legal opinion if there are any other buildings that have a shoot on site mandate. Stay tuned............ I’m still waiting on your selection of your second favorite terrorist. I’m not sure if you’re a Unabomber guy or a Shoe Bomber guy. Maybe you prefer Dylann Roof. I don’t know. Either way, we really need to drill down on this issue. Maybe you and Doc could even have a Terrorist Draft in which you select your favorite terrorists. I can see it now: “Chef Jim Crow is trading DoQ Eric Rudolph and a first-round selection in next year’s draft for the KKK and a seventh-round pick in 2023.” Great stuff! 1
SoCal Deek Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 What in the world is this discussion about? If the people in that hallway were indeed the threat that many on here are desperate to say that they were then the appropriate police response would’ve been to open fire on ALL of them! Not pick out one to make an example of. The officer made a mistake! Is it really so hard to admit that? Do we have to adhere to the Party line on everything at all costs? Sheeesh 1
Chef Jim Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 19 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: I’m still waiting on your selection of your second favorite terrorist. I’m not sure if you’re a Unabomber guy or a Shoe Bomber guy. Maybe you prefer Dylann Roof. I don’t know. Either way, we really need to drill down on this issue. Maybe you and Doc could even have a Terrorist Draft in which you select your favorite terrorists. I can see it now: “Chef Jim Crow is trading DoQ Eric Rudolph and a first-round selection in next year’s draft for the KKK and a seventh-round pick in 2023.” Great stuff! Logic is not your strong suit counselor. How have you come to the conclusion that I give a rats ass about the woman shot. Please elaborate. Check.......
BillStime Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 1 hour ago, Chef Jim said: Not to mention you'll get shot if you climb the WH fence. Go find out.
Chef Jim Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 6 minutes ago, BillStime said: Go find out. Oh that Billy Boy hatred rears its ugly head again. You may want to get some counseling for it. It will kill ya man. 1
BillStime Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 4 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Oh that Billy Boy hatred rears its ugly head again. You may want to get some counseling for it. It will kill ya man. You’re the one suggesting you wouldn’t get shot in a post 1/6 environment
SectionC3 Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 26 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: What in the world is this discussion about? If the people in that hallway were indeed the threat that many on here are desperate to say that they were then the appropriate police response would’ve been to open fire on ALL of them! Not pick out one to make an example of. The officer made a mistake! Is it really so hard to admit that? Do we have to adhere to the Party line on everything at all costs? Sheeesh Not in the eyes of the law he didn’t. She shouldn’t have been there. She shouldn’t have behaved in a threatening manner. The idea that, somehow, officer error contributed to her death is ludicrous. It’s too bad that somebody had to bury a loved one, but let’s be clear. Her death is the result of her error, and nothing about her behavior on the day in question deserves veneration.
SoCal Deek Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 35 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Not in the eyes of the law he didn’t. She shouldn’t have been there. She shouldn’t have behaved in a threatening manner. The idea that, somehow, officer error contributed to her death is ludicrous. It’s too bad that somebody had to bury a loved one, but let’s be clear. Her death is the result of her error, and nothing about her behavior on the day in question deserves veneration. Veneration? Not sure how that applies to my comment. But go ahead, stay stuck in your narrative, and see how much healing we get in this country. The officer's actions were wrong. It doesn't make him a horrible human being, but his actions were still wrong.
Doc Posted August 10, 2021 Posted August 10, 2021 39 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Not in the eyes of the law he didn’t. She shouldn’t have been there. She shouldn’t have behaved in a threatening manner. The idea that, somehow, officer error contributed to her death is ludicrous. It’s too bad that somebody had to bury a loved one, but let’s be clear. Her death is the result of her error, and nothing about her behavior on the day in question deserves veneration. Like I told Billyboy, you just eviscerated BLM and their narrative. 1 1
SectionC3 Posted August 11, 2021 Posted August 11, 2021 3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: Veneration? Not sure how that applies to my comment. But go ahead, stay stuck in your narrative, and see how much healing we get in this country. The officer's actions were wrong. It doesn't make him a horrible human being, but his actions were still wrong. The first step to healing is admitting that the insurrection was wrong.
Chef Jim Posted August 11, 2021 Posted August 11, 2021 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: The first step to healing is admitting that the insurrection was wrong. Done. Next.
Doc Posted August 11, 2021 Posted August 11, 2021 (edited) 30 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: The first step to healing is admitting that the insurrection riots was are wrong. FIFY and likewise. We've already done it. Edited August 11, 2021 by Doc
Recommended Posts