Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

I thought the Lincoln project were republicans that were against trump. Now DeSantis as well.

 

 


They’re for democracy; not autocrats 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

I thought the Lincoln project were republicans that were against trump. Now DeSantis as well.

 

No, just another bunch of pedophile Dems...

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Banning books isn’t mitigated by the total number available 

 

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

Of course not. I’m just pointing out what school libraries are all about these days. I designed them for a living! 

They are not libraries, they are media centers because they handle all versions of media available, including books. And it is not a ban, since all of these books are available in the Library system, the difference is when my daughter orders a book for delivery I get to see it before it arrives. Using the word ban is either dishonest or pathetically ill informed at this point. I am also not allowed to discuss politics at school, am I banned from being political?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
Posted
On 3/26/2023 at 2:29 AM, Gene Frenkle said:

Wait...that's not what I meant. 🤣

 

 

 

“*****, onanism, bestiality, prostitution, genital mutilation, *****, dildos, rape, and even infanticide,” the parent, who noted that they have actually read the Bible, wrote. “You’ll no doubt find that the Bible, under Utah Code Ann. § 76-10-1227, has ‘no serious values for minors’ because it’s pornographic by our new definition.”

 

“Get this PORN out of our schools,” they continued. “If the books that have been banned so far are any indication for way lesser offenses, this should be a slam dunk.”


Great! Makes sense to me. Another book with no place in public elementary school. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Reminder that parents are the dumbest knuckle dragging snowflakes out there.

 

No kids for you?

 

heck yeah. the corporate funded state would be a much better parent.

 

SMH

Posted
1 minute ago, Chris farley said:

No kids for you?

 

heck yeah. the corporate funded state would be a much better parent.

 

SMH


Hmm, would I rather have education designed by people with PhDs and masters degrees in child psychology, education, arts, etc. 

 

or 

 

Would I rather have education designed by Breighlynn, the high-school dropout mom of two with mild alcoholism and a belief that 5G towers cause autism? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Hmm, would I rather have education designed by people with PhDs and masters degrees in child psychology, education, arts, etc. 

 

or 

 

Would I rather have education designed by Breighlynn, the high-school dropout mom of two with mild alcoholism and a belief that 5G towers cause autism? 

 

Most parents want to know what their kids are taught vs some elitist snob that tries to call them insults for taking care of what they brought into the world.

 

Its all good. fits with the modern left. 

 

good comment. perfectly summarized the modern left.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
  • Dislike 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

 

Most parents want to know what their kids are taught vs some elitist snob that tries to call them insults for taking care of what they brought into the world.

 

Its all good. fits with the modern left. 

 

good comment. perfectly summarized the modern left.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Would you trust your barber to repair the timing belt on your car?

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Roundybout said:


Would you trust your barber to repair the timing belt on your car?


Are you stupid? 

20 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Hmm, would I rather have education designed by people with PhDs and masters degrees in child psychology, education, arts, etc. 

 

or 

 

Would I rather have education designed by Breighlynn, the high-school dropout mom of two with mild alcoholism and a belief that 5G towers cause autism? 


Common Core. That’s all that has to be said about that. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


This is not a rebuttal. 


You tried to make a point on saying parents should have no say in their children’s education because they aren’t qualified by an institution. I am going to take a stab saying you aren’t a parent are you? 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Commsvet11 said:


You tried to make a point on saying parents should have no say in their children’s education because they aren’t qualified by an institution. I am going to take a stab saying you aren’t a parent are you? 


Parents can have a say at school board meetings. 
 

They should not be able to delete parts of the curriculum just because it hurts their feelings, like this law allows.

Edited by Roundybout
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

 

Most parents want to know what their kids are taught vs some elitist snob that tries to call them insults for taking care of what they brought into the world.

 

Its all good. fits with the modern left. 

 

good comment. perfectly summarized the modern left.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

they have every right to send their kids to private schools if they disagree with what is being taught by mainstream educators.  I hear there's even a private school run by avowed nazis.  or they can homeschool.

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Parents can have a say at school board meetings. 
 

They should not be able to delete parts of the curriculum just because it hurts their feelings, like this law allows.


I think it’s a good idea, it’s a check system where subject matter can be reviewed and if needed added to or discarded. Again the example of common core comes to mind 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

they have every right to send their kids to private schools if they disagree with what is being taught by mainstream educators.  I hear there's even a private school run by avowed nazis.  or they can homeschool.

They shouldn’t have their tax $$ confiscated by the school system and Teachers Union if they choose a private school. Therein lies the b#*+h. Dems / Libs don’t want competition to their insane agenda because it’s a loser if the public is given real choice. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Boatdrinks said:

They shouldn’t have their tax $$ confiscated by the school system and Teachers Union if they choose a private school. Therein lies the b#*+h. Dems / Libs don’t want competition to their insane agenda because it’s a loser if the public is given real choice. 


“Insane agenda” is when you teach that Jackie Robinson experienced racism, amirite?

Edited by Roundybout
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Boatdrinks said:

They shouldn’t have their tax $$ confiscated by the school system and Teachers Union if they choose a private school. Therein lies the b#*+h. Dems / Libs don’t want competition to their insane agenda because it’s a loser if the public is given real choice. 

So should people without kids be free from paying school taxes?

  • Eyeroll 1
×
×
  • Create New...