Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, LeviF said:


"I have nothing to be afraid of," McEwen, who is currently shopping her memoir, said.

 

lol, lmao. 

it was an aside (btw).  what about the banned authors?  hilarious.  do you think the Nazi's were right here?  got something against "A farewell to Arms"?  

Ernest Hemingway's wartime love story "A Farewell to Arms" was banned in Italy in 1929 because of its painfully accurate account of the Italian retreat from Caporetto, and challenged by the Vernon-Verona-Sherill, N.Y., School District in 1980 as a "sex novel."

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted
1 minute ago, redtail hawk said:

it was an aside (btw).  what about the banned authors?  hilarious.  do you think the Nazi's were right here?


Why should anybody allow books advocating for pedophilia and other abominations?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, LeviF said:


Why should anybody allow books advocating for pedophilia and other abominations?

yes, the great Gatsby is filth.  1984 was not prophetic and G.K. Chesterton's works were pure porn.  do u believe the nazi's were correct?  Oh, and Einstein produced nothing of value.

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

No.

 

You don't get to play childish games, where you simply continue down your fairy-tale path.

 

There are multiple references to what is in the books that have been deemed inappropriate for schoolchildren in almost every link provided here.

 

It is  was happening and that is why the State education board stepped in.

 

Play the fool if you want to Roundy, but don't expect us to dance along with you.

 

:thumbsup:

 


If there are so many, surely it would be easy for you to name one

 

maybe you could start by telling me why AP Black History was banned! What, specifically, was so inappropriate?

 

Or, will you give me another cowardly cop out?

14 hours ago, Orlando Tim said:

L8r g8r


So you have nothing but what Carlson tells you to be afraid of every day. Some way to live. 

Edited by Roundybout
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
10 hours ago, LeviF said:


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_für_Sexualwissenschaft

Whitewashes any thing to do with homosexuals

Consider while you read that 

Then when you’re done you can look up kentler. 

Wow.  perhaps we should open a topic just on homosexuality and maybe one on human sexuality and its study.  Seems there's much to disagree with you on.  Do you think physically attacking people and destroying the work of someone you disagree with on cultural matters is right?  More to the point, I'll ask again.  Do you think the Nazis were right generally?

Trying to put that aside, what about the authors on the list whose books were burned that had no sexual theme:  Huxley's Brave New World, Ulysses by James Joyce, War and Peace by Tolstoy, The Invisible Man by Wells along with many others.  Ironic that you chose the word whitewash when that is figuratively what the Nazis did to whole swaths of important literature.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Wow.  perhaps we should open a topic just on homosexuality and maybe one on human sexuality and its study.  Seems there's much to disagree with you on.  Do you think physically attacking people and destroying the work of someone you disagree with on cultural matters is right?  More to the point, I'll ask again.  Do you think the Nazis were right generally?

Trying to put that aside, what about the authors on the list whose books were burned that had no sexual theme:  Huxley's Brave New World, Ulysses by James Joyce, War and Peace by Tolstoy, The Invisible Man by Wells along with many others.  Ironic that you chose the word whitewash when that is figuratively what the Nazis did to whole swaths of important literature.

 

Punishing your enemies and rewarding your friends is what politics is.

 

Do I agree generally with the party line of the NSDAP? No. Fascism is ALWAYS a response to hostile communist takeover of one's culture. And like every reactionary movement it's an overcorrection. But it's what you flirt with when you purposefully degrade a culture through sexual subversion and the undermining of the family structure. A ***** around and find out scenario, if you will.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, LeviF said:

 

Punishing your enemies and rewarding your friends is what politics is.

 

Do I agree generally with the party line of the NSDAP? No. Fascism is ALWAYS a response to hostile communist takeover of one's culture. And like every reactionary movement it's an overcorrection. But it's what you flirt with when you purposefully degrade a culture through sexual subversion and the undermining of the family structure. A ***** around and find out scenario, if you will.

No, fascism is about proposing simple solutions to complex problems in order to gain control and power and then not actually having the solutions.  Thus force becomes necessary.  A spark in the form of a perceived common enemy and anger by the (usually minority) disenfranchised are generally required for ignition.

 

 Hitler certainly didn't live his sexual life in a nuclear family. So the irony cascades.

But what of the nonsexual books burned?  You keep avoiding those.  Consider this quote from Smithsonian Magazine on book burning:

 

"People saw knowledge as a way to change themselves, and the world, and so it became a far more dangerous commodity, no longer controlled exclusively by the elite. What better way to reshape the balance of power and send a message at the same time than by burning books?"  Sound familiar?  It's been done many times throughout history almost exclusively by authoritarians.  And it's always wrong.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


If there are so many, surely it would be easy for you to name one

 

maybe you could start by telling me why AP Black History was banned! What, specifically, was so inappropriate?

 

Or, will you give me another cowardly cop out?


So you have nothing but what Carlson tells you to be afraid of every day. Some way to live. 

 

https://www.npr.org/2023/02/01/1153364556/ap-african-american-studies-black-history-florida-desantis

 

The course wasn't banned certain topics were banned. Let's make sure we're clear here

  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
Just now, redtail hawk said:

certain topics were banned.  not good imo.

 

well his comment was that the course was banned when in fact it wasn't. wanted to make sure we're clear there.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

well his comment was that the course was banned when in fact it wasn't. wanted to make sure we're clear there.

so, do you think this is sound thinking?:  Florida officials last month issued a chart that said it promoted the idea that modern American society oppresses Black people, was inappropriate, and uses articles by critics of capitalism.

So that we can all argue each point from a knowledgable base, here is the Fla document:

 

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted
3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

so, do you think this is sound thinking:  Florida officials last month issued a chart that said it promoted the idea that modern American society oppresses Black people, was inappropriate, and uses articles by critics of capitalism.

 

Just to be clear the course wasn't banned right? Seems like an important distinction here. 

 

All societies oppress people and grow off the backs of people.  The Blacks as slaves, the Chinese building the railroad, Irish, etc. We didn't invent slavery or oppression here but we created an environment to allow oppression to decline over time.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Roundybout said:

 


So you have nothing but what Carlson tells you to be afraid of every day. Some way to live. 

Please explain what Tucker has to do with this book being at one of the local elementary schools? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

Just to be clear the course wasn't banned right? Seems like an important distinction here. 

 

All societies oppress people and grow off the backs of people.  The Blacks as slaves, the Chinese building the railroad, Irish, etc. We didn't invent slavery or oppression here but we created an environment to allow oppression to decline over time.  

yes, and why should that history be whitewashed?  What are they afraid of by recounting history?  What is their purpose ?  Why not remove all anti Irish immigrant history as well?  perhaps remove the history of sweat shops?

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

yes, and why should that history be whitewashed?  What are they afraid of by recounting history?  What is their purpose ?

 

 

"Lather, Rinse' Repeat. . . . . . . .the same false claim over and over.

 

It is NOT whitewashed.

 

That is the point that you cannot refute.

 

History about the horrors of slavery and the fight for Civil Rights continues to be taught, just as always

 

Just not through the lying prism of 1619 and CRT.

 

It is the recent 'educators who are trying to 'recount' their course.

 

What is their purpose ?

 

 

 

 

(ooh, name the book that has been whitewashed)

 

😆

 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

yes, and why should that history be whitewashed?  What are they afraid of by recounting history?  What is their purpose ?

 

Getting rid of BLM topics is probably a good thing...what are they going to teach?  Rioting to the point of killing dozens, destroying billions in property and then embezzling the donations?  Yikes not a good look in the history books.  Reparations?  Who gets them and who pays them?  Do the nations who sold the slaves to the south pay up?  Do the soldiers families who fought for the North get paid?  Does that mean I get some? How are they teaching this stuff?  

 

You also can't cover every topic in these courses so some are going to be left out.

×
×
  • Create New...