Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, redtail hawk said:

It might soon become that.  Slippery slope.  Desantis wants in your bedroom...and they say Biden is weird.


Explain how keeping sexual books out school libraries is a slippery slope to banning books in a public library.

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Commsvet11 said:


Explain how keeping sexual books out school libraries is a slippery slope to banning books in a public library.

banning books is a slippery slope to banning more forms of artistic expression...oh, and more books.  and contraception. I'm glad u asked.  can we agree that reproduction is vital to the continued existence of a species?

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted
10 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

banning books is a slippery slope to banning more forms of artistic expression...oh, and more books.  and contraception. I'm glad u asked.  can we agree that reproduction is vital to the continued existence of a species?


So your solution to sexual books being school libraries is to leave them there in the libraries because if you remove them that is book banning and that will lead to banning more “artistic expression” which leads to bannning regular books and then pow banning contraception. 
 

Wow. Now you may need a book on how to reproduce but us regular humans have been reproducing without a manual for quite sometime.


 

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Commsvet11 said:


So your solution to sexual books being school libraries is to leave them there in the libraries because if you remove them that is book banning and that will lead to banning more “artistic expression” which leads to bannning regular books and then pow banning contraception. 
 

Wow. Now you may need a book on how to reproduce but us regular humans have been reproducing without a manual for quite sometime.


 

 

ask yourself why books on different lifestyle choices are such a threat to people like desantis and his followers.  My bet is that to many, it's a threat to what they define as their manhood.   I don't perceive that they threaten me or my lifestyle at all.  What do you think?  Oh and reproduction is enhanced by pleasure.  It's kinda the impetus or ideally it is.

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted
18 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

ask yourself why books on different lifestyle choices are such a threat to people like desantis and his followers.  My bet is that to many, it's a threat to what they define as their manhood.   I don't perceive that they threaten me or my lifestyle at all.  What do you think?  Oh and reproduction is enhanced by pleasure.  It's kinda the impetus or ideally it is.


What are you taking about? None of that has anything to do with sexual books being kids libraries.

 

And reproduction is enhanced by pleasure? If putting your penis inside a ***** doesn’t give you pleasure that means you size problem shorty

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Commsvet11 said:


What are you taking about? None of that has anything to do with sexual books being kids libraries.

 

And reproduction is enhanced by pleasure? If putting your penis inside a ***** doesn’t give you pleasure that means you size problem shorty

maybe you should buy a copy of the Kama Sutra.  There's a reason it has been popular for hundreds of years...While you're at it check out the ancient "menu" in the brothel at Pompei.  Human instinct doesn't change with time regardless of the desantis' of history. Denying it doesn't make it go away.

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted
2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

maybe you should buy a copy of the Kama Sutra.  There's a reason it has been popular for hundreds of years...


Some people don’t need a sex manual to do what comes naturally. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

banning books is a slippery slope to banning more forms of artistic expression...oh, and more books.  and contraception. I'm glad u asked.  can we agree that reproduction is vital to the continued existence of a species?

What does reproduction have to do with pushing gender dysphoria on second graders? 
 

Do you have children? Have you spent a lot of time talking to 8 year olds about the different types of sex? Is it a travesty these second graders aren’t able to access books about intercourse in their media center hour in Florida?

 

while your on the slippery slope I suppose you feel every elementary school in America should unblock pornhub right? 
 

it’s really difficult to understand the principle your arguing for here. 

Posted
7 hours ago, ChiGoose said:


Book bans slowly taking over some Florida

 

“According to PEN America, a global organization that protects rights of literature and free expression, during the 2021-2022 school year, Florida had the second-highest number of book bans in the country.  

 

They had 566 bans across 21 districts, ranging from the Panhandle to South Florida. Now, in its Index of School Book Bans, which covers the U.S., PEN America said it's listing instances where students' access to books in schools was restricted or diminished for either limited or indefinite periods of time.”

The amount of people who don't understand the words they use is astounding. Everyone who wants to get one of these books can still get it. They simply can't get them from school. Your argument is the same that your work computer does not allow you to access alcohol or gambling websites, therefore you are banned. 

  • Dislike 1
Posted

Funny how the slippery slope isn’t a fallacy now but in 2015 you were a 60IQ bigot for claiming you could recognize patterns. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

 

can you still check out the Kama Sutra?  Cuz it's Indian and sexual but informative.  Does Desantis understand that procreation usually happens thru sex?

This explains a lot that your school had the Karma Sutra in their elementary school 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

This explains a lot that your school had the Karma Sutra in their elementary school 

It explains a lot that you can't spell the title.  However, my school didn't have it.  We did study Michelangelo however.  I saw the Pieta in NYC when I was about 6.  Read much?

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted
19 minutes ago, LeviF said:

Funny how the slippery slope isn’t a fallacy now but in 2015 you were a 60IQ bigot for claiming you could recognize patterns. 

Some writers distinguish between a slippery slope event and a slippery slope argument.[2][3]: 122  A slippery slope event can be represented by a series of conditional statements, namely:

if p then q; if q then r; if r then … z.

The idea being that through a series of intermediate steps p will imply z. Some writers point out that strict necessity isn't required and it can still be characterized as a slippery slope if at each stage the next step is plausible.[2][4]: 186  This is important for with strict implication p will imply z but if at each step the probability is say 90% then the more steps there are the less likely it becomes that p will cause z.

A slippery slope argument is typically a negative argument where there is an attempt to discourage someone from taking a course of action because if they do it will lead to some unacceptable conclusion.[5] Some writers point out that an argument with the same structure might be used in a positive way in which someone is encouraged to take the first step because it leads to a desirable conclusion.[6]

If someone is accused of using a slippery slope argument then it is being suggested they are guilty of fallacious reasoning, and while they are claiming that p implies z, for whatever reason, this is not the case. In logic and critical thinking textbooks, slippery slopes and slippery slope arguments are normally discussed as a form of fallacy, although there may be an acknowledgement that non-fallacious forms of the argument can also exist.[7]: 273–311 

Posted
Just now, redtail hawk said:

Some writers distinguish between a slippery slope event and a slippery slope argument.[2][3]: 122  A slippery slope event can be represented by a series of conditional statements, namely:

if p then q; if q then r; if r then … z.

The idea being that through a series of intermediate steps p will imply z. Some writers point out that strict necessity isn't required and it can still be characterized as a slippery slope if at each stage the next step is plausible.[2][4]: 186  This is important for with strict implication p will imply z but if at each step the probability is say 90% then the more steps there are the less likely it becomes that p will cause z.

A slippery slope argument is typically a negative argument where there is an attempt to discourage someone from taking a course of action because if they do it will lead to some unacceptable conclusion.[5] Some writers point out that an argument with the same structure might be used in a positive way in which someone is encouraged to take the first step because it leads to a desirable conclusion.[6]

If someone is accused of using a slippery slope argument then it is being suggested they are guilty of fallacious reasoning, and while they are claiming that p implies z, for whatever reason, this is not the case. In logic and critical thinking textbooks, slippery slopes and slippery slope arguments are normally discussed as a form of fallacy, although there may be an acknowledgement that non-fallacious forms of the argument can also exist.[7]: 273–311 

the income tax being sold as 1% to the 1% then ending up where it is now. when anti tax folks cried about the slippery slope the entire time, is a pretty good example.

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...