B-Man Posted January 8 Posted January 8 Let's get our stories lies straight. Yikes: Biden Campaign Calls Reporters to Wilmington to Issue Talking Points in Series of Meetings by Nick Arama The Biden team has spread this pleasant fiction about why Joe Biden is doing so badly in the polls in approval and against the leading Republican candidate, former President Donald Trump. The first part of the fiction is insulting and paints Americans as ignorant — they just don't understand how great Biden is and how much he has done, they say. The second part of that is that it's just the "messaging." They just need to work on that. So here comes the Biden campaign in a transparently bad effort to tell the media what they should be saying about the race and deliver the talking points for them. https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/01/08/biden-campaign-calls-reporters-to-wilmington-to-issue-the-talking-points-n2168425 . 1
sherpa Posted January 8 Posted January 8 Not knowing the Secretary of Defense was not functioning is the final straw of many final straws, including not being able to know where he is or complete a coherent sentence. This Administration is dysfunctional, incompetent and needs to be replaced. 3
B-Man Posted January 8 Posted January 8 8 minutes ago, sherpa said: Not knowing the Secretary of Defense was not functioning is the final straw of many final straws, including not being able to know where he is or complete a coherent sentence. This Administration is dysfunctional, incompetent and needs to be replaced.
Doc Posted January 8 Posted January 8 8 minutes ago, sherpa said: Not knowing the Secretary of Defense was not functioning is the final straw of many final straws, including not being able to know where he is or complete a coherent sentence. This Administration is dysfunctional, incompetent and needs to be replaced. You would think that wouldn't need to be said. But if you believe the popular vote in 2020, there are a lot of dumb people... 1
BillsFanNC Posted January 13 Posted January 13 Yep. No covid? Well we can always start WWIII as a way to rig 2024.
Irv Posted January 13 Author Posted January 13 Biden and his buddies starting WWIII. Wars in Israel, Gaza, Yemen, Iran, Ukraine, soon-to-be-Taiwan. Meanwhile dopey Biden goes on vacation while the Secretary of Defense, unbeknownst to him, is hospitalized for four days. On the latter, I completely get it. Why would Austin bother notifying Biden? I'm sure he notified whoever is in charge. What a mess. 1
B-Man Posted February 9 Posted February 9 Joe Biden Needs to Fire Everyone Who Approved Last Night's Speech By Joe Cunningham FTA: Biden's handlers either couldn't talk him down or actively encouraged him to make this public speech, and the White House seemed to think he would prove to America that he's still got it when he clearly does not. This is not the management style it takes to run a country. Biden is both a doddering old fool and an egomaniac incapable of knowing or understanding his limits. This is the one issue the Biden team and the Democrats can't craft some kind of campaign strategy around. This is an issue that they have to do their best to mitigate or ignore, and they can't do that. If they can't manage Biden's worst instincts (all of them?), then how can they say they can manage a country? https://redstate.com/joesquire/2024/02/09/joe-biden-needs-to-fire-everyone-who-approved-last-nights-speech-n2169869 1
JaCrispy Posted February 9 Posted February 9 (edited) 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Joe Biden Needs to Fire Everyone Who Approved Last Night's Speech By Joe Cunningham FTA: Biden's handlers either couldn't talk him down or actively encouraged him to make this public speech, and the White House seemed to think he would prove to America that he's still got it when he clearly does not. This is not the management style it takes to run a country. Biden is both a doddering old fool and an egomaniac incapable of knowing or understanding his limits. This is the one issue the Biden team and the Democrats can't craft some kind of campaign strategy around. This is an issue that they have to do their best to mitigate or ignore, and they can't do that. If they can't manage Biden's worst instincts (all of them?), then how can they say they can manage a country? https://redstate.com/joesquire/2024/02/09/joe-biden-needs-to-fire-everyone-who-approved-last-nights-speech-n2169869 We just need to keep him alive enough for the election…😉 Edited February 9 by JaCrispy
Doc Posted February 9 Posted February 9 3 hours ago, B-Man said: Joe Biden Needs to Fire Everyone Who Approved Last Night's Speech By Joe Cunningham FTA: Biden's handlers either couldn't talk him down or actively encouraged him to make this public speech, and the White House seemed to think he would prove to America that he's still got it when he clearly does not. This is not the management style it takes to run a country. Biden is both a doddering old fool and an egomaniac incapable of knowing or understanding his limits. This is the one issue the Biden team and the Democrats can't craft some kind of campaign strategy around. This is an issue that they have to do their best to mitigate or ignore, and they can't do that. If they can't manage Biden's worst instincts (all of them?), then how can they say they can manage a country? https://redstate.com/joesquire/2024/02/09/joe-biden-needs-to-fire-everyone-who-approved-last-nights-speech-n2169869 Why? This Admin prides itself on not having much turnover no matter how incompetent they all are...
BillsFanNC Posted February 19 Posted February 19 The party who cried wolf, nobody believes them. Well except for useful idiots. 1
B-Man Posted March 15 Posted March 15 Biden Tries to Take Questions but Staff Cuts Him Off in Bizarre, Troubling Video By Nick Arama FTA: Any time you let Biden out in public, you know his staff has to be holding its breath, wondering what he will say or do next that is likely to be embarrassing or further expose his issues. I don't know why they had him speaking with people on a porch, but that appeared to confuse him. https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/03/14/biden-michigan-remarks-n2171401
B-Man Posted March 16 Posted March 16 Wow. The real powers are just coming right out with it. This could have gone in the "Democrats are Panicking" thread also. The Washington Post Published a Brutal Op-Ed Calling on Kamala Harris to Step Aside You and I know that Kamala Harris was a diversity hire, a choice Joe Biden made to fulfill his promise of choosing a woman to be his Vice President. Harris was that and more: she would become the Black Vice President as well as the first Vice President of Asian descent. Combine that with her time as a prosecutor, which allies at the time hinted would be how they would go after Trump, and she was the right choice. Biden, according to reports, was also partial to her because, like him, she had "paid her dues" working her way through the political ladder, including time in the U.S. Senate. But, that's not an opinion that is widely shared by the left. Some of them may think it, mind you, but they sure as hell don't say it out loud. Among other things, Harris is extremely volatile and doesn't respond to criticism well. Her office is reportedly chaotic, and her temperament isn't exactly helpful. Imagine my surprise, then, when the Washington Post editors allowed this column to be published on Friday. The whole column, titled "For the Country’s Sake, Vice President Harris Should Step Aside," is just a brutal explainer as to why Harris is such a drag on Biden's administration and re-election efforts. To actually see the sentence "She was picked because she was Black and female, a combo tantamount to job security," from someone on the left is stunning, even if it's the most accurate statement regarding Harris' job. https://redstate.com/joesquire/2024/03/16/the-washington-post-published-a-brutal-op-ed-calling-on-kamala-harris-to-step-aside-n2171464 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/15/kamala-harris-quit-biden-2024/ 1
Doc Posted March 17 Posted March 17 11 hours ago, B-Man said: Wow. The real powers are just coming right out with it. This could have gone in the "Democrats are Panicking" thread also. The Washington Post Published a Brutal Op-Ed Calling on Kamala Harris to Step Aside You and I know that Kamala Harris was a diversity hire, a choice Joe Biden made to fulfill his promise to Jim Clyburn of choosing a black woman to be his Vice President. Harris was that and more: she would become the Black Vice President as well as the first Vice President of Asian descent. Combine that with her time as a prosecutor, which allies at the time hinted would be how they would go after Trump, and she was the right choice. Biden, according to reports, was also partial to her because, like him, she had "paid her dues" working her way through the political ladder, including time in the U.S. Senate. But, that's not an opinion that is widely shared by the left. Some of them may think it, mind you, but they sure as hell don't say it out loud. Among other things, Harris is extremely volatile and doesn't respond to criticism well. Her office is reportedly chaotic, and her temperament isn't exactly helpful. Imagine my surprise, then, when the Washington Post editors allowed this column to be published on Friday. The whole column, titled "For the Country’s Sake, Vice President Harris Should Step Aside," is just a brutal explainer as to why Harris is such a drag on Biden's administration and re-election efforts. To actually see the sentence "She was picked because she was Black and female, a combo tantamount to job security," from someone on the left is stunning, even if it's the most accurate statement regarding Harris' job. https://redstate.com/joesquire/2024/03/16/the-washington-post-published-a-brutal-op-ed-calling-on-kamala-harris-to-step-aside-n2171464 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/15/kamala-harris-quit-biden-2024/ FIFY. And good luck getting her to step aside. But I hope they try.
B-Man Posted March 17 Posted March 17 12 hours ago, B-Man said: The Washington Post Published a Brutal Op-Ed Calling on Kamala Harris to Step Aside You and I know that Kamala Harris was a diversity hire, a choice Joe Biden made to fulfill his promise of choosing a woman to be his Vice President. Harris was that and more: she would become the Black Vice President as well as the first Vice President of Asian descent. Combine that with her time as a prosecutor, which allies at the time hinted would be how they would go after Trump, and she was the right choice. Biden, according to reports, was also partial to her because, like him, she had "paid her dues" working her way through the political ladder, including time in the U.S. Senate. But, that's not an opinion that is widely shared by the left. Some of them may think it, mind you, but they sure as hell don't say it out loud. Among other things, Harris is extremely volatile and doesn't respond to criticism well. Her office is reportedly chaotic, and her temperament isn't exactly helpful. Imagine my surprise, then, when the Washington Post editors allowed this column to be published on Friday. The whole column, titled "For the Country’s Sake, Vice President Harris Should Step Aside," is just a brutal explainer as to why Harris is such a drag on Biden's administration and re-election efforts. To actually see the sentence "She was picked because she was Black and female, a combo tantamount to job security," from someone on the left is stunning, even if it's the most accurate statement regarding Harris' job. https://redstate.com/joesquire/2024/03/16/the-washington-post-published-a-brutal-op-ed-calling-on-kamala-harris-to-step-aside-n2171464 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/15/kamala-harris-quit-biden-2024/ Post Columnist Calls on Kamala Harris to Step Aside, Quickly Learns Why You Can't Do That JOHN SEXTON This isn't the first time a columnist has made this suggestion. David Ignatius suggested it as a back up plan to Biden himself stepping down last September. In any case, it's true that Harris has been a disappointment which is why you don't see her much. Her approval rating is as low or lower than Biden's own approval rating. So if the party is committed to going with Biden which it is at this point, they could at least get a shot in the arm by picking someone else as VP who seems more up to the job of stepping in if something were to happen to Biden. It's possible to imagine an alternate reality where Democrats are able to a) admit they have a problem and b) turn the solution into a plus for the campaign. But that alternate reality isn't where we live as Kathleen Parker found out. In the 24 hours since her column was published, it has received comments from 10,141 readers, a majority of whom just wanted to let her know that she is a racist and a misogynist. A sample: Blatant racism. Why is the Post publishing such? Fire that writer and ban her from these pages what an awful misogynistic, racist piece of smelliness Shame on you, your true colors are showing. This is racism. Why did you publish this, WaPo? Fire this creature. Like most republican women, Kathleen Parker hates women and the rights of women. Careful, your southern plantation views are showing Why is this racist disgusting piece of recycled hits on the veep WaPo's number one featured opinion????? Is this the Washington Post or Fox "News"?? Such an ugly piece. I expect the sexism from the boy's club but it is painful to see it internalized like this. What's the matter, Kathleen. Is she a bit too black? What a sexist, racist, rant. I could go on and on but you get the idea. For a tremendous number of Democrats, the suggestion that Harris hasn't done a great job and wouldn't be a great president is racist, sexist BS that should immediately lead to the person who spoke up being fired or silenced. This is the party of identity politics. The most amusing part of all this is that people seem to be mostly outraged by the idea that Biden picked Harris "because she was Black and female." But as Parker points out, Joe Biden publicly promised to pick a woman VP before he selected her. This was not a secret. https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2024/03/16/post-columnist-calls-on-kamala-harris-to-step-aside-quickly-learns-why-you-cant-do-that-n3784830
All_Pro_Bills Posted March 17 Posted March 17 (edited) 6 hours ago, B-Man said: Post Columnist Calls on Kamala Harris to Step Aside, Quickly Learns Why You Can't Do That JOHN SEXTON This isn't the first time a columnist has made this suggestion. David Ignatius suggested it as a back up plan to Biden himself stepping down last September. In any case, it's true that Harris has been a disappointment which is why you don't see her much. Her approval rating is as low or lower than Biden's own approval rating. So if the party is committed to going with Biden which it is at this point, they could at least get a shot in the arm by picking someone else as VP who seems more up to the job of stepping in if something were to happen to Biden. It's possible to imagine an alternate reality where Democrats are able to a) admit they have a problem and b) turn the solution into a plus for the campaign. But that alternate reality isn't where we live as Kathleen Parker found out. In the 24 hours since her column was published, it has received comments from 10,141 readers, a majority of whom just wanted to let her know that she is a racist and a misogynist. A sample: Blatant racism. Why is the Post publishing such? Fire that writer and ban her from these pages what an awful misogynistic, racist piece of smelliness Shame on you, your true colors are showing. This is racism. Why did you publish this, WaPo? Fire this creature. Like most republican women, Kathleen Parker hates women and the rights of women. Careful, your southern plantation views are showing Why is this racist disgusting piece of recycled hits on the veep WaPo's number one featured opinion????? Is this the Washington Post or Fox "News"?? Such an ugly piece. I expect the sexism from the boy's club but it is painful to see it internalized like this. What's the matter, Kathleen. Is she a bit too black? What a sexist, racist, rant. I could go on and on but you get the idea. For a tremendous number of Democrats, the suggestion that Harris hasn't done a great job and wouldn't be a great president is racist, sexist BS that should immediately lead to the person who spoke up being fired or silenced. This is the party of identity politics. The most amusing part of all this is that people seem to be mostly outraged by the idea that Biden picked Harris "because she was Black and female." But as Parker points out, Joe Biden publicly promised to pick a woman VP before he selected her. This was not a secret. https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2024/03/16/post-columnist-calls-on-kamala-harris-to-step-aside-quickly-learns-why-you-cant-do-that-n3784830 The reader comments to the opinion piece just reflect the DEI cults belief that identity politics and not performance or results matter. But what they say probably won't get the writer fired or disciplined. The comments were to be expected. On queue. The real question is what is the motivation for the liberal establishment controlling all MSM to authorize the Post to publish a hit piece targeting VP Harris? I'll cross off telling the truth or informing thier readers of facts from the list of motives. Edited March 17 by All_Pro_Bills 1
Recommended Posts