The American Media Should Not Be Trusted

[All_Pro_Bills]

8 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

It's more that they know things like the laptop are real and damaging, but don't care.  Meanwhile they get their panties in a twist over Don Jr. taking a meeting with a Russian lawyer.  

A Russian lawyers that prior to that meeting held a discussion with Clinton contractor FusionGPS head Glenn Simpson.  Somebody intimately involved in the Russian dossier funding and production.  But I guess somehow the media left out those little details of the story and nobody in the press has ever asked Glenn Simpson or Natalia Veselnitskaya what they discussed prior to her meeting at Trump Tower.  

Edited December 5, 2022 by All_Pro_Bills

[SoCal Deek]

17 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

A genuine liberal spawned from the civil rights and anti-war movements of the 1960's distrusts corporations and fights for the average citizen against big government and big business.  Figures like Humphrey, McGovern, and Kennedy would not recognize these people calling themselves liberals.

 

These modern day liberals are posers, sellouts to the establishment many grew up fighting against, that sold their souls and beliefs for a big fat corporate paycheck.  What it boils down to is they can lead a much more comfortable life lying for "the man" than they could by telling the truth.  They all know things like the laptop are genuine but dare not speak those words for fear of being pushed off the gravy train.    

I’ve put them in the same category as many of the politicians they run cover for. Both professions were generally not high earning fields. People sought public office to make a difference and people went into journalism to speak truth (or at least pose questions) to power and shine a light on corruption. When you spend so much time with lobbyists wearing really expensive suits and eating in really expensive restaurants, you start to wonder why you’re sacrificing for your ‘calling’. Fast forward a few years….and here we are. Sell outs to the left and sell outs to the right. 

[BillsFanNC]

7 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

A Russian lawyers that prior to that meeting held a discussion with Clinton contractor FusionGPS head Glenn Simpson.  Somebody intimately involved in the Russian dossier funding and production.  But I guess somehow the media left out those little details of the story and nobody in the press has ever asked Glenn Simpson or Natalia Veselnitskaya what they discussed prior to her meeting at Trump Tower.  

 

Or why the Obama DOJ signed off on letting Natalia Veselnitskaya into the country so she could meet with them.

[All_Pro_Bills]

4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Or why the Obama DOJ signed off on letting Natalia Veselnitskaya into the country so she could meet with them.

No doubt it was a matter of "national security" which cannot be discussed or revealed as that would risk exposing methods and procedures and put people in danger.  🤣

Edited December 5, 2022 by All_Pro_Bills

[B-Man]

 

#JOURNALISM:  Reporters Against Reporting.

 

The MSM is having a mental breakdown over the revelations. Their favorite toy, Twitter, has been taken away from them and they will never forgive Musk.

 

Yet their real anger now is being directed at reporter Matt Taibbi, formerly of Rolling Stone and now a star on Substack. He, along with Glenn Greenwald and Bari Weiss has built a huge following on the platform, filling a void in the current news landscape: former mainstream reporters who have defected from the MSM due to disgust with the rejection of journalistic standards.

 

Musk is releasing the Twitter files through Taibbi, and the media Elite™ are in full attack mode against Taibbi.
 

Utterly unhinged attacks 

 

Utterly unhinged and totally coordinated attacks.

 

 Almost as if there is an official MSM Narrative™ they are trying to push.

 

Almost.

 

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2022/12/05/reporters-against-reporting-n515583
 

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

New York Times Falsely Dubs Hunter Biden Laptop 'Stolen'

 

BY MATT MARGOLIS

 

Everyone knows that Hunter Biden left his infamous laptop at a computer repair shop in Delaware. The store owner even contacted Hunter to get him to pick it up, but he never returned for it, effectively forfeiting the device per the store’s policy — which Hunter Biden agreed to. But on Sunday, the New York Times bizarrely claimed the laptop had been “stolen” in a report about the release of the “Twitter files” by Elon Musk.
 

There is simply no excuse for this blatant mischaracterization of the laptop. For over two years now, it has been widely reported that Hunter Biden legally surrendered the laptop to the shop by not claiming it. Not once has it ever been alleged that the laptop was stolen.

 

So, what exactly is the New York Times trying to pull with this fake news report?

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/12/05/new-york-times-falsely-dubs-hunter-biden-laptop-stolen-n1650990
 

 

[Doc]

If I were the shop owner, I'd sue the NYT.

[JaCrispy]

1 hour ago, Doc said:

If I were the shop owner, I'd sue the NYT.

Yup, that’s defamation in the 1st degree…👍

[B-Man]

 

MARGOT CLEVELAND: If A Legitimate Free Press Existed, The Twitter Files Wouldn’t.

 

The projection from these supposed reporters couldn’t have been any more ironic because had there been a widespread outbreak of journalism following the Post’s bombshell coverage of the Biden family scandal, Twitter’s censorship would not have happened — or, if it did, it would not have mattered. 

 

Had journalists from legacy outlets and especially the supposed standard-bearers of journalism, such as The New York Times and The Washington Post, approached the story with the seriousness it deserved, it seems unlikely Twitter would have dared censor the story. Or such censorship, had it occurred, would have been futile because journalists would be falling over themselves to report the latest details in a political scandal that suggested the Democrat candidate for president had participated in a pay-to-play enterprise with his son while vice president. 

 

Real journalists would have tracked down and authenticated the laptop materials, as they did a belated two years later. Real journalists would have questioned Bobulinski and reported his collaborating statements. Real journalists would have demanded answers from Joe, Hunter, and James Biden, the president’s brother who also profited from the many deals; they would have sought answers on every detail suggesting corruption discussed in the emails and other materials recovered from the laptop. And real journalists would have pushed intelligence agencies, and the former members of them who signed on to a letter casting the laptop as Russian disinformation, on the basis for that claim. 

 

https://thefederalist.com/2022/12/05/if-a-legitimate-free-press-existed-the-twitter-files-wouldnt/

 

 

I’m reminded of what Harry Reid said when he got caught lying about Mitt Romney’s taxes during the 2012 presidential campaign: “It worked, didn’t it?”

 

[Westside]

20 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

New York Times Falsely Dubs Hunter Biden Laptop 'Stolen'

 

BY MATT MARGOLIS

 

Everyone knows that Hunter Biden left his infamous laptop at a computer repair shop in Delaware. The store owner even contacted Hunter to get him to pick it up, but he never returned for it, effectively forfeiting the device per the store’s policy — which Hunter Biden agreed to. But on Sunday, the New York Times bizarrely claimed the laptop had been “stolen” in a report about the release of the “Twitter files” by Elon Musk.
 

There is simply no excuse for this blatant mischaracterization of the laptop. For over two years now, it has been widely reported that Hunter Biden legally surrendered the laptop to the shop by not claiming it. Not once has it ever been alleged that the laptop was stolen.

 

So, what exactly is the New York Times trying to pull with this fake news report?

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/12/05/new-york-times-falsely-dubs-hunter-biden-laptop-stolen-n1650990
 

 

They lie so much I don’t think they’re incapable of being neutral anymore. They’ve sold their souls to the democratic cartel. Idiots.

[Doc]

They know.  They just don't care as long as their guy gets into office.  That's why I laugh in their faces at all the talk of "freedom of speech" and what is a "threat to democracy."

[BillsFanNC]

 

[Tiberius]

Media should praise these heroes 

 

 

[Tiberius]

Like you ignored stuff in the shower???? 🤣 

What a POS!!! 

 

 

 

[Big Blitz]

This is awfully…..white

 

 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

5 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

This is awfully…..white

 

 

Nanci’s behind the scenes version of “equity”

[BillsFanNC]

7 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

This is awfully…..white

 

 

 

In other news, half of the NFL referees have posed for a picture with Bill Beliichick.

 

Absolutely disgusting.

[B-Man]

 

 

 

                                            

 

 

 

 

.

[Big Blitz]

 

[JaCrispy]

1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

 

Yup- and it’s only dangerous for the Establishment because it means their propaganda narrative keeps proving false…

 

 

Edited December 11, 2022 by JaCrispy