Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

Is this supposed to be sarcasm? Because the source referenced is CNN...serious question...

It pretty much falls in line with what I was taught. Conservatives respond to shock and fear ads. Democrats respond to positive ads.

 

Their brains are different.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

Is this supposed to be sarcasm? Because the source referenced is CNN...serious question...

 

The headline is just another way of saying that Conservatives believe Fox News over CNN.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Governor said:

It pretty much falls in line with what I was taught. Conservatives respond to shock and fear ads. Democrats respond to positive ads.

 

Their brains are different.

And you were ‘taught’ this where exactly and from whom? 

Posted
2 hours ago, Governor said:

It pretty much falls in line with what I was taught. Conservatives respond to shock and fear ads. Democrats respond to positive ads.

 

Their brains are different.

thunberg-gif.gif&f=1&nofb=1

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
On 7/2/2021 at 8:40 AM, Buffalo Timmy said:

I love studies like this especially when the "facts" are that Corona started naturally, that the US was not funding research in that lab in Wuhan, children wearing masks is important in the fight against Covid, and HCQ is dangerous. When your "facts" are so blatantly false and only stupid people believe them it is easy to see how crap like this is printed.

 

Don't forget Russian collusion, Russian bounties, Kavanugh raping Blasey-Ford, Hunter being qualified to be on any company's board, etc.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2021/07/08/governor-oddly-not-named-in-story-of-repealed-law-that-could-have-more-quickly-repaired-surfside-condo/

 

 

Governor oddly not named in story of repealed law that could have more quickly repaired Surfside condo

 

 

NBC 6 in South Florida has a story out Thursday about a Florida law that could have more quickly repaired the collapsed Surfside condo had it not been repealed. We saw a lot of people tweeting that the story completely left out the name of the governor who repealed that law, and sure enough, when we read it, we couldn’t find the name either. The only clue is that it was repealed in 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

Huh, gosh, golly, gee, the gunman’s veteran status was not key or in any way related to his shooting of officers monitoring a peaceful protest in Dallas.

 

Seems NPR has left out a few important details …

 

 

 

 

Referring to the gunman as a veteran and deliberately leaving out some BIG details … typical.

 

Basically, all they’re really doing here is perpetuating the idea that veterans are dangerous while completely ignoring the reality of who the gunman REALLY was.

 

In deciding which pertinent details to include as context about the killer, I’d think his own stated motivation would come well before his veteran status.

 

Yep, they really went with “veteran” as the defining characteristic of a black supremacist racist who ambushed police and was specifically targeting white officers, killing five of them.

 

 

 

Posted

 

 

 

 

But to the New York Times, “Freedom” is just some sort of anti-government slogan?

 

 

 

We've reached the point of "Freedom and other anti-government slogans."

 

:wallbash:

 

 

Posted
16 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

But to the New York Times, “Freedom” is just some sort of anti-government slogan?

 

 

 

We've reached the point of "Freedom and other anti-government slogans."

 

:wallbash:

 

 

 

 

 

They sound more and more like the CCP every day.

 

Like the way they "reported" on the Hong Kong protesters.  

 

 

They portrayed anti lockdown American protesters the exact same way.  

 

Americans portrayed by their own media the same way China portrayed Hong Kong protesters.  Let this sink in.  

Posted

Lefties have loved Cuba ever since Barry tried to normalize relations with them.  More of their hypocrisy, along the lines of embracing Islam when their treatment of women, gays and other religions is far worse than they believe Repubs treat them.

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, 716er said:

It is in Cuba, moron. 

There may not be a more honest, clear and transparent example of this thread’s header then the post you just completely bypassed, so you can insult someone.  But you’re not really here for truth, 716.  Just to practice the sacred art of douchery.


Back to the thread:

This representation by the NYT is a gross misuse of words that should concern citizens.    When we have an American News Source refer to the desperately screamed term “freedom “ in an oppressed country like Cuba, as simply “anti-government “, we have a real problem.  When actual “morons” gloss over it because the same media is the well they proudly sip from…. Dark days ahead.  

Edited by Frat-Train
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

To the Cuban government people shouting freedom is anti-government.

 

Disingenuous douchebaggery does go far here, though. 

 

Did you lap up your talking points from Ted Cruz?

Posted

You all seem to be commenting on a headline without reading the actual article.  "Freedom" in this situation seems to be anti-government in Cuba.

 

Are they saying "freedom" is anti-government in the US?

 

I guess context does matter.

Posted
3 minutes ago, 716er said:

To the Cuban government people shouting freedom is anti-government.

 

Disingenuous douchebaggery does go far here, though. 

 

Did you lap up your talking points from Ted Cruz?


Same as when the Jews shouted freedom to the Nazis, right?  Or when Taiwan shouts freedom to China?  Ignorance is truly bliss.  But let’s be real…. You’re not here to be politically accurate.  You’re here because you have hatred to give to those who don’t agree with you.  


BTW, Not a fan of Cruz, considering I’m a Democrat.  I’m proof that moderates are the last line of defense before the far left (you) allows the country to be destroyed.  

1 minute ago, LeGOATski said:

You all seem to be commenting on a headline without reading the actual article.  "Freedom" in this situation seems to be anti-government in Cuba.

 

Are they saying "freedom" is anti-government in the US?

 

I guess context does matter.

Context is reading the same rhetoric in all left-leaning headlines, referring to a challenge to an oppressive communist government, simply as “Anti-government “.  It’s the same way they refer to what’s happening in Asia.  But yea, ignorance is bliss and you should continue to focus on the semantics.  

Posted
13 minutes ago, Frat-Train said:

desperately screamed term “freedom “ in an oppressed country like Cuba, as simply “anti-government “  

Would you say the government is doing the oppressing?

 

If yes, then it is anti-government

 

Like William Wallace's famous scream at the end of Braveheart 😆

Posted
3 minutes ago, Frat-Train said:


Same as when the Jews shouted freedom to the Nazis, right?  Or when Taiwan shouts freedom to China?

 

From the perspective of those governments, cries of freedom from the people subjected to their regimes were anti-government. 

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...