Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

The US interferes in foreign elections, just like Russia- and just like every other nation on the planet...Hell, sometimes we just say “screw the elections”, and do straight up regime change, ourselves...So, to think it is only Russia interfering with elections is very naive...

What election are we interfering in? 

 

You are drawing a moral equivilance between us and war criminal Putin. You believe our government is morally equal to Putin's? 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

What election are we interfering in? 

 

You are drawing a moral equivilance between us and war criminal Putin. You believe our government is morally equal to Putin's? 

No, I believe our government is immorally equal to Putin’s...😉

 

The CIA has their tentacles in every election where oil and drugs are involved...

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JaCrispy said:

No, I believe our government is immorally equal to Putin’s...😉

 

The CIA has their tentacles in every election where oil and drugs are involved...

Really? You see no difference between our country and Russia on a moral basis? That’s uncredible! 
 

what elections are you claiming we interfered with? 

Posted
1 hour ago, JaCrispy said:

No, I believe our government is immorally equal to Putin’s...😉

 

The CIA has their tentacles in every election where oil and drugs are involved...

There is one main rule defining the uni polar world order. 

 

The US government makes the rules and everyone else goes along with them, or else and when we decide to change the rules, the rules will change.  Everyone must adjust to those changes, or else.     

 

1) Don't follow the rules and the US government has no problem with deploying the State Department, or the Treasury department, or the Pentagon, or the intelligence services to interfere your affairs, or elections, and will seek to destabilize and replace your leaders with more compliant political figures that will follow the rules and this applies to any country regardless of their political system.  

2) Follow the rules and you will be left alone as it doesn't matter what form of government you rule under including undemocratic dictatorships and royal kingdoms. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

There is one main rule defining the uni polar world order. 

 

The US government makes the rules and everyone else goes along with them, or else and when we decide to change the rules, the rules will change.  Everyone must adjust to those changes, or else.     

 

1) Don't follow the rules and the US government has no problem with deploying the State Department, or the Treasury department, or the Pentagon, or the intelligence services to interfere your affairs, or elections, and will seek to destabilize and replace your leaders with more compliant political figures that will follow the rules and this applies to any country regardless of their political system.  

2) Follow the rules and you will be left alone as it doesn't matter what form of government you rule under including undemocratic dictatorships and royal kingdoms. 

Which elections are we interfering in? 

Posted

 

 

Back to the media thread.

 

 

 

The People’s Pundit TORCHES media in 2 brutal tweets for pushing ‘PUTIN DID IT’ narrative with inflation to protect Biden

 

 

We GET it media, you’re no longer hiding the fact you’re the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party but c’mon! The only people dumb enough to believe the crazy inflation we’re seeing right now (the highest in 40 YEARS!) is Putin’s fault probably also believe Biden really got 81 million votes.

 

Oh, we’re not supposed to make those jokes, right?

 

Too bad.

 

Rich Baris aka The People’s Pundit went OFF on the media for quickly pointing the finger at Putin today as atrocious numbers come out about inflation in March.

 

https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2022/04/12/lyin-pieces-of-sht-the-peoples-pundit-torches-media-in-2-brutal-tweets-for-pushing-putin-did-it-narrative-with-inflation-to-protect-biden/

 

 

 

Posted

 

 

 

 

 

Because it's.............................................................................................................................a lie.

 

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

Because it's.............................................................................................................................a lie.

 

 

 


Putin price hike….

 

😂😂😂😂

 

😡😡😡😡

 

It’s ***** pathetic at this point. 

  • Agree 1
Posted

                         

 

Finally !

 

The media farce should be ended.

 

REAL debates or NO debates.

 

 

 

 

 

                        

 

 

                       thank-god-robert-downey-jr.gif

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

Not up for Debate: The RNC Votes Unanimously to Withdraw From the Commission on Presidential Debates

 

The RNC took far too long in doing this. They should have voted to withdraw after the CNN Candy Crowley/Mitt Romney 2012 debate debacle.

 

 

Jennifer Oliver O'Connell made this prediction back in October of 2020:

 

Bottom line: No matter what may occur tonight, or who wins the election, suffice to say this geriatric and outdated Commission on Presidential Debates is done.

 

They have shown themselves to be partisan, unprepared, out of touch, and obsolete. John Danforth, one of those geriatric members of the Commission, and a Republican, took to print and the airwaves to rebuke Trump for his criticism of their methods, to emphasize how important this Commission is to the national conversation, and to let you know what an august and truly bipartisan body they are. Yeah… right.

 

Put them on the list of things that Trump broke.

 

We’ll see how this plays out with Democrat, Libertarian, and Independent candidates talking amongst themselves.

 

https://redstate.com/jenniferoo/2022/04/14/not-up-for-debate-the-rnc-votes-unanimously-to-withdraw-from-the-commission-on-presidential-debates-n550357

 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Not up for Debate: The RNC Votes Unanimously to Withdraw From the Commission on Presidential Debates

 

The RNC took far too long in doing this. They should have voted to withdraw after the CNN Candy Crowley/Mitt Romney 2012 debate debacle.

 

 

Jennifer Oliver O'Connell made this prediction back in October of 2020:

 

Bottom line: No matter what may occur tonight, or who wins the election, suffice to say this geriatric and outdated Commission on Presidential Debates is done.

 

They have shown themselves to be partisan, unprepared, out of touch, and obsolete. John Danforth, one of those geriatric members of the Commission, and a Republican, took to print and the airwaves to rebuke Trump for his criticism of their methods, to emphasize how important this Commission is to the national conversation, and to let you know what an august and truly bipartisan body they are. Yeah… right.

 

Put them on the list of things that Trump broke.

 

We’ll see how this plays out with Democrat, Libertarian, and Independent candidates talking amongst themselves.

 

https://redstate.com/jenniferoo/2022/04/14/not-up-for-debate-the-rnc-votes-unanimously-to-withdraw-from-the-commission-on-presidential-debates-n550357

 

 

What I would like to see is the Dem and Republican candidate agree to meet, along with a libertarian candidate, and each party chooses a moderator. 3 debates each with one moderator and let them be partisan. The third one should always be the Libertarian moderator whose most common response would be " why are better equiped to handle this than the people in their own lives?"

×
×
  • Create New...