Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Governor said:

They had to create their own news echo chamber because there wasn’t ever any good news about them. That shows the decay of the party.

 

Why is it always about the "party"?  Why is one party "good" and another party "bad"?  You only believe what you want to believe?  You seem to lose sight of the issue that most news outlets are shameless shills for the Political Class -- both left and right.  They should just come out from behind their transparent curtain and go back to the days when there were "party publications" and let all the other outlets report on the un-slanted facts.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, snafu said:

 

Why is it always about the "party"?  Why is one party "good" and another party "bad"?  You only believe what you want to believe?  You seem to lose sight of the issue that most news outlets are shameless shills for the Political Class -- both left and right.  They should just come out from behind their transparent curtain and go back to the days when there were "party publications" and let all the other outlets report on the un-slanted facts.

 

 

I’ve always supported bringing back an updated version of The Fairness Doctrine which would eliminate cable news and all of the echo chamber news that you see in this board.

 

As of right now, this isn’t a “both sides” problem. 1 party is much, much worse than the other. 1 party actually exists in an alternate reality and doesn’t believe in a due-north on truth.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Governor said:

I’ve always supported bringing back an updated version of The Fairness Doctrine which would eliminate cable news and all of the echo chamber news that you see in this board.

 

As of right now, this isn’t a “both sides” problem. 1 party is much, much worse than the other. 1 party actually exists in an alternate reality and doesn’t believe in a due-north on truth.

 

So that's a yes.  You believe what you want to believe. 

The "echo chamber news that you see in this board" comes from both sides and parties' platforms.  How do you quantify "much worse"?  You say "alternate reality" but perhaps you mean a less hyperbolic "different viewpoint".

 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

So that's a yes.  You believe what you want to believe. 

The "echo chamber news that you see in this board" comes from both sides and parties' platforms.  How do you quantify "much worse"?  You say "alternate reality" but perhaps you mean a less hyperbolic "different viewpoint".

 

 

 

I believe in things that are real and can be confirmed as truth. I don’t watch the news. I strictly follow campaigns and certain policy. I don’t chase boogeyman social issues unless I’m extremely bored and want to bludgeon my opponents over the head for my own entertainment. 

 

If I’m up early enough, I’ll watch the Washington Journal to get an idea on which way the winds are blowing on certain issues.

 

I only care about winning elections.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I’m trying to find the 7x green check reply button to supersize my like of @T master post!  
 

 

 

 

 Oh dam i didn't quite get it till i went back and looked i must have had a tremor or something there for a second 😂 

Edited by T master
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
On 6/10/2021 at 7:09 AM, SCBills said:

I guess we can just keep a list here of everything the media has lied, or “misinformed” the public of over the last few years.  
 

Russiagate

 

Bountygate

 

Officer Sicknick skull bashed in with a fire extinguisher 

 

Covington Catholic kids

 

Hunter Biden’s laptop is “Russian misinformation”

 

”Debunked” Wuhan lab leak

 

President Trump “tear gassed” protesters for a photo op

 

The science behind hydroxychloroquine

 

 

 

Funny, you left off SPYGATE

 

 

Posted

The question is not whether "the Media" can or cannot be trusted to tell the truth or the facts objectively (not sure if the OP is including sketch Twitter feeds as part of this too)....

 

It is whether enough US citizens have the mental capacity to tell the difference regardless of the source.

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

Funny, you left off SPYGATE

 

 


Pretty sure the media is covering this right now, and as it’s not detrimental to Democrats, are not slanting their coverage in a biased fashion and/or deliberately misreporting.   
 

Now if you want to say Fox isn’t really covering it, you’d be correct... but to my knowledge, they haven’t lied about it yet.  Simply resorting to the tactic of not reporting bad news about “your side” ie., none of the network Nightly News covering the Ilhan Omar vs Dems infighting.   

Posted
10 hours ago, WideNine said:

The question is not whether "the Media" can or cannot be trusted to tell the truth or the facts objectively (not sure if the OP is including sketch Twitter feeds as part of this too)....

 

It is whether enough US citizens have the mental capacity to tell the difference regardless of the source.

 

 

 

 

When to majority of the media repeatedly states that 1.75 trillion is more than 1.9 trillion and half the country agrees we know that some people can't determine truth on their own. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

So those questions are only appropriate when it’s a black person involved - got it 

 

Nope, they've always been appropriate, for everyone.  It's why I've always said don't commit crimes and don't resist arrest/assault police officers and odds are you won't die at their hands, without ever specifying race. 

 

But I'd still like to know who shot her, why it's being hidden and what his motive for killing her was?  If it's because she didn't listen to him even though she was unarmed and a lot smaller than him, would you accept that when a cop kills a black person?  I think not.

×
×
  • Create New...