Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

And So the Liberal Media Meltdown Begins...

Sarah Anderson 

 

One of the first things I do every morning before I start working is sort through the day's headlines from a couple of dozen different news sources to see what's going on in the world. For some reason, I let myself believe that the liberal media wouldn't start out this second Donald Trump term with breathless hysteria, reporting every time he so much as blinked, but here we are. Some things never change. 

 

Today, I was greeted by headlines about how imperialism will be the downfall of the United States, pictures of supposed "illegal immigrants" crying, outrage over the number of "white people" at the inauguration, outrage over the number of "wealthy people" at the inauguration, questions about whether Trump can actually do a number of the things he did on Monday, January 6 virtue signaling, and panic over any number of executive orders signed. There was also commentary about the first lady's outfit from Monday — "funeral wear" several called it, claiming she was subtly showing that she is just as upset about a second Trump term as the mainstream media is — and my favorite, the freaking out over Elon Musk making a "Nazi salute" because he dared raise his hand in the air in celebration.   

 

Where do I even start? I guess I'll start with Musk and what our own Robert Spencer called the "first leftist hysterical fit of the new Trump era."  As Erick Erickson described it, "a socially awkward autistic billionaire goober did a big one-handed hug on a stage that PBS and some left-wing historians thought looked like a Nazi salute." Here's how PBS responded (your tax dollars at work!)

 

Next up is everyone's favorite underperforming "news" network, MSNBC. If you think anyone on that channel learned their lesson about Trump coverage after the American people made their voices heard in November, you'd be wrong. These people are so beside themselves that I truly hope they have some kind of therapists on the payroll over there, though given the fact that they're hemorrhaging viewers as we speak, I doubt they can afford it. 

 

https://pjmedia.com/sarah-anderson/2025/01/21/and-so-the-liberal-media-meltdown-begins-n4936208

Posted
20 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

At this point. Almost all for profit or state funded media needs to be read with a pound of serious scepticism.  They have no integrity left. 

 

 

About as mainstream as media gets:

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/sweden-eyes-sending-inmates-abroad-prisons-full-due-gang-crime-wave-2025-01-29/

 

https://www.wsj.com/video/bombings-in-sweden/5AC87B18-EF34-4FAE-B3A9-45BD2EE0D187

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/11/sweden-freedom-of-information-laws-deadly-bombings

 

How many times has your Cat Turd tweeted about it?

Not a rhetorical question. The answer is "Zero."

Meanwhile a search for "catturd" and "Greenland" yields more than a page of results.

 

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

At this point. Almost all for profit or state funded media needs to be read with a pound of serious scepticism.  They have no integrity left. 

 

 

Sad.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Who the eff brought up cat turd or Greenland.  

 

Your tbs post.  

 

Silly strawman.  Focus 

How about those links I gave you - dating back almost a year - about Sweden bombings?

You choose to avoid the mainstream media, then claim that the mainstream media "ignores" an issue, when in fact it is your alt media that has never mentioned it.

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
Just now, JDHillFan said:

Doesn’t sound like you are sure despite stating it’s a fact. 

Because it is so ignorant to post one of those "mainstream media ignores it" things without, like, doing a simple Google search first.

Posted
Just now, The Frankish Reich said:

Because it is so ignorant to post one of those "mainstream media ignores it" things without, like, doing a simple Google search first.

No debate there. It seems equally ignorant to state, and I quote you, “when in fact it is your alt media that has never mentioned it.” I haven’t bothered to investigate as I don’t actually care. Just asking if you were sure. All you had to do was say no. 

Posted
Just now, JDHillFan said:

No debate there. It seems equally ignorant to state, and I quote you, “when in fact it is your alt media that has never mentioned it.” I haven’t bothered to investigate as I don’t actually care. Just asking if you were sure. All you had to do was say no. 

Well my sentence was a bit off, since it should have been "you have not heretofore cut-and-pasted one of your alt-media sources commenting on bombings in Sweden."

Posted
Just now, The Frankish Reich said:

Well my sentence was a bit off, since it should have been "you have not heretofore cut-and-pasted one of your alt-media sources commenting on bombings in Sweden."

In your rush to defend the honor of your reliable mainstream media you have thrown up on yourself. Reminiscent of your reflexive post standing up for Karen Bass. Remember that one?

 

Anyway, here’s a tweet from 7 years ago. Your fact was, in fact, a pile of crap. 
 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, JDHillFan said:

In your rush to defend the honor of your reliable mainstream media you have thrown up on yourself. Reminiscent of your reflexive post standing up for Karen Bass. Remember that one?

 

Anyway, here’s a tweet from 7 years ago. Your fact was, in fact, a pile of crap. 
 

 

 

Nice self-own.

SOURCE: Various Swedish newspapers.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...