Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

AND THIS:

 

The Traditional Media Panics as Elon Musk's X Platform Destroys Their Ability to Control What You See

 

d9844bd9-acdc-4d95-a632-077d13edae10-105

 

The outbreak of war between Israel and the Hamas-run government of the Palestinian enclave in Gaza has pushed "X," the social media platform formerly known as Prince, I mean Twitter, to the forefront of news distribution. Some, however, claim that X is so overrun by misinformation that it is useless. Evidence, however, shows that this critique is driven by a dislike of the changes Elon Musk made to democratize X, laziness on the part of online and traditional media, and the inability of corporate media to control the narrative.

 

This is about controlling the narrative 

 

Under the old regime, the horrific images coming out of Southern Israel would have been blocked by Twitter.

 

We would not have seen Shani Louk stripped naked with her limbs either broken or dislocated and paraded around by Hamas animals in a truck.

 

We would not have seen the bodies of dead Israeli citizens who had been slaughtered in their homes.

 

Those images would have violated the rules about showing violent images.

 

We would not have seen images of Palestinians calling for more murders. The high-profile accounts that sided with Hamas would have been safely silent because they would have known that calling for genocide would put their social media clout in danger.

 

What we would have seen plenty of would have been images from mainstream media, nearly all of whom are clearly sympathetic with Hamas's goals if not entirely aligned with the methods, showing Israeli bomb strikes in Gaza. That's why the EU censorship agency is up in arms.

 

https://redstate.com/streiff/2023/10/11/the-traditional-media-panics-as-elon-musks-x-platform-destroys-their-ability-to-control-what-you-see-n2164943

 

Like I was telling ChiGoose in the other thread...

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

AND THIS:

 

The Traditional Media Panics as Elon Musk's X Platform Destroys Their Ability to Control What You See

 

d9844bd9-acdc-4d95-a632-077d13edae10-105

 

The outbreak of war between Israel and the Hamas-run government of the Palestinian enclave in Gaza has pushed "X," the social media platform formerly known as Prince, I mean Twitter, to the forefront of news distribution. Some, however, claim that X is so overrun by misinformation that it is useless. Evidence, however, shows that this critique is driven by a dislike of the changes Elon Musk made to democratize X, laziness on the part of online and traditional media, and the inability of corporate media to control the narrative.

 

This is about controlling the narrative 

 

Under the old regime, the horrific images coming out of Southern Israel would have been blocked by Twitter.

 

We would not have seen Shani Louk stripped naked with her limbs either broken or dislocated and paraded around by Hamas animals in a truck.

 

We would not have seen the bodies of dead Israeli citizens who had been slaughtered in their homes.

 

Those images would have violated the rules about showing violent images.

 

We would not have seen images of Palestinians calling for more murders. The high-profile accounts that sided with Hamas would have been safely silent because they would have known that calling for genocide would put their social media clout in danger.

 

What we would have seen plenty of would have been images from mainstream media, nearly all of whom are clearly sympathetic with Hamas's goals if not entirely aligned with the methods, showing Israeli bomb strikes in Gaza. That's why the EU censorship agency is up in arms.

 

https://redstate.com/streiff/2023/10/11/the-traditional-media-panics-as-elon-musks-x-platform-destroys-their-ability-to-control-what-you-see-n2164943

 

 

.


I literally signed up for it this weekend and this stuff started breaking out over the weekend as a typical social media hold out. And this is absolutely 100% true

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Like I was telling ChiGoose in the other thread...


This might go down in history as the moment in time when the liberal establishment and Democratic Party too by extension, lost narrative control thanks to Musks commitment to true real free speech. 
 

it gives hope. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, JaCrispy said:

Because they are governed by CRT, DEI, and Woke Anti-racist ideology…

 

They can only call someone a terrorist if they are white…😉

They call ordinary citizens expressing opposing views terrorists.  Look at the clown in the White House cheerleading the cause.  A disgrace and a liar.  But now they all get to see what real terrorists and extremists look like in action.  MAGA white supremist are the biggest threat.  What a joke.  A joke clearly exposed.  Now it's time to deal with reality whether they want to or not.  Welcome to the real world liberal ass clowns.  

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted

 

 

'Sources say' alert! Media spotted doing HEAVY lifting for Biden WH (and Iran)

 

Earlier today at the White House, John Kirby tied himself in knots trying to avoid saying it's pretty clear Iran was at least partially supportive of the Hamas attacks in Israel over the weekend. The "no evidence" response sure sounded familiar. 

 

The scheduled release of $6 billion that got the Biden White House's final approval last month (on the anniversary of 9/11 no less) is a bad look for this administration, and they appear to know it.

 

Right on cue come some "intelligence sources say" stories that the media of course are running with unquestioned. Here are three examples: 

 

 

"Spy agencies" and their media mouthpieces think the public is extremely stupid.

 

 

Maybe we should wait to hear from those 50 former intel officials who signed off on the letter saying Hunter Biden's laptop was most likely a "Russian disinformation campaign" before trying to decide what's true. If they say it's factual, then it isn't.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Shocked 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

 

 

 

P.S. :  I love how they warn against the GOP limiting the scope of government. . . . . . .like that would be a bad thing.

 

Thanks for the 'endorsement' A.P. 

 

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
8 hours ago, B-Man said:

New York Times headlines all in a few hours

 

 

632efab8-7d70-4bcc-a364-86cadd193b91-1052x615.thumb.jpg.4109b8af9a915198dd288b93e2414abd.jpg

 

They just couldn't wait til the truth was known


Clowns. Always creating problems. 

 

8 hours ago, B-Man said:

So Bad’: Bill Melugin Lets Axios Have It Over Faulty ‘Report’ on the Biden Border Crisis

 

38be7d8f-681b-48bd-83e7-ca9923055d6d-1052x615.thumb.jpg.597367797966e4646c2998829f428d8a.jpg

 

https://redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2023/10/17/so-bad-fox-news-reporters-let-axios-have-it-over-faulty-report-on-the-biden-border-crisis-n2165202


Just looking for “asylum.”  :rolleyes: 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

The Canadian media? 

 

Don't trust them either. 

 

 

I was coming to post this, truly everyone should watch it and laugh at the manipulation effort of the "journalist". When you can't define the words you use or give an example of people you are "quoting" then you are either a liar or a dolt. In his case I think both is applicable.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...