Jump to content

The American Media Should Not Be Trusted


Recommended Posts

Suprised to see CNN actually doing an article about these shady Bail PACs that get violent criminals back on the street to create more victims.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/21/us/bail-reform-bail-charities-invs/index.html

 

Would be better if they actually reported on where or any large sources of that influx of money came from.  

 

same sources funding the marches/riots?

 

BLM still has not disclosed. but we know from the news back then that much of there money was coming from huge corporate donations.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

One of the more active, left-leaning posters here likes to cite Rolling Stone as a source of information. Tsk, tsk. 


Remember when rolling stone was relevant?

 

Yeah I wasn’t born yet either. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

“Um, sorry chuds, but preventing rapes and murders by satanic gangs that rule your country in the stead of a real government is like, really undemocratic.”
 

To paraphrase Chigurh, if democracy brought you to weekly extortion payments to MS-13 as your only avenue to avoid brutal violence, of what use was democracy?

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Chris farley said:

Suprised to see CNN actually doing an article about these shady Bail PACs that get violent criminals back on the street to create more victims.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/21/us/bail-reform-bail-charities-invs/index.html

 

Would be better if they actually reported on where or any large sources of that influx of money came from.  

 

same sources funding the marches/riots?

 

BLM still has not disclosed. but we know from the news back then that much of there money was coming from huge corporate donations.

 

 


I still can’t figure out the Soros motive for backing these DAs that help drive the same. 
 

He’s too smart not to see the outcomes. 

he’s just secretly anarchist? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

One of the more active, left-leaning posters here likes to cite Rolling Stone as a source of information. Tsk, tsk. 

 

Rolling Stone lost whatever it had left with the "Rape on Campus" story featuring "Jackie," a lying attention seeker who basically plagiarized s book to create the story.

Glad they had to pay for that.

Just despicable. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

I still can’t figure out the Soros motive for backing these DAs that help drive the same. 
 

He’s too smart not to see the outcomes. 

he’s just secretly anarchist? 

 

He hates America.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

He hates America.

 
It doesn’t add up. Hates the western world that made him immensely wealthy, the one that overcame the nazi occupation that shapes his early life. 
 

Does he fundamentally believe progressivism is an answer? It contradicts all of his behaviors. 
 

he’s a fascinating dichotomy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 It doesn’t add up. Hates the western world that made him immensely wealthy, the one that overcame the nazi occupation that shapes his early life. 
 

Does he fundamentally believe progressivism is an answer? It contradicts all of his behaviors. 
 

he’s a fascinating dichotomy 

 

Look at how many people that grew up here hate America.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Sure but he’s extremely intelligent lucid and rational if you read his work. Way to much so for irrational hate.  There is something more pathological or sinister or out of touch at work here. 

 

It's textbook social engineering. Crafting a low trust society with the perfect blend of anarchy and tyranny helps to justify the coalescence of power and sanctioned violence into the hands of a central government that cares not for its people. Dissolving trust ties in communities and turning nations into mere economic zones helps to make more and more people reliant on faceless agencies and corporations that have zero accountability. At the end of the day, it makes a very small number of people very rich. And the love of money, as they say...

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Sure but he’s extremely intelligent lucid and rational if you read his work. Way to much so for irrational hate.  There is something more pathological or sinister or out of touch at work here. 

Soros made a Billion by betting against the bank of England, he thinks he can time markets that are in distress. He does not ponder how soon he is dying, he is still planning his next Billion 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

Soros made a Billion by betting against the bank of England, he thinks he can time markets that are in distress. He does not ponder how soon he is dying, he is still planning his next Billion 

 

He also trashed the Thai Baht, putting millions of people in a far wore position than they were before.

He was trying to do the same with the Mexican peso, all for personal, financial gain, until the US Fed intervened and supported the peso, ending his foray.

He's a horrible man. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sherpa said:

He also trashed the Thai Baht, putting millions of people in a far wore position than they were before.

He was trying to do the same with the Mexican peso, all for personal, financial gain, until the US Fed intervened and supported the peso, ending his foray.

He's a horrible man. 

 

The worst part is his kids are just as horrible.  So even after he kicks, they'll still be around. :rolleyes: 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LeviF said:

 

It's textbook social engineering. Crafting a low trust society with the perfect blend of anarchy and tyranny helps to justify the coalescence of power and sanctioned violence into the hands of a central government that cares not for its people. Dissolving trust ties in communities and turning nations into mere economic zones helps to make more and more people reliant on faceless agencies and corporations that have zero accountability. At the end of the day, it makes a very small number of people very rich. And the love of money, as they say...

 

9 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

Soros made a Billion by betting against the bank of England, he thinks he can time markets that are in distress. He does not ponder how soon he is dying, he is still planning his next Billion 

 

4 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

He also trashed the Thai Baht, putting millions of people in a far wore position than they were before.

He was trying to do the same with the Mexican peso, all for personal, financial gain, until the US Fed intervened and supported the peso, ending his foray.

He's a horrible man. 


thanks all, interesting overlay of perspectives. 
 

so it could be argued that, in conjunction with the observations above, that he is in fact a sociopath that has perfected the approach of generating wealth from financial collapse, and his ‘investment’ into the elite class of social engineering (useful and unwitting idiots) in many cases is to bake in a fundamental economic collapse he can profit from. 
 

For example if one were to suppose that the Iraq war was in part to uphold the integrity of the petro dollar and reserve currency status, it explains why he marketed W as some existential threat to humanity (frankly hilarious) 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

 

For example if one were to suppose that the Iraq war was in part to uphold the integrity of the petro dollar and reserve currency status, it explains why he marketed W as some existential threat to humanity (frankly hilarious) 

 

 

 

Yes. In this instance Soros would have no issue with W and his cronies' methods (lies and obfuscation) so long as it actually served him and his pocket. But it presumably wouldn't, so he gloms on to the moral outrage that (rightly) is associated with the Iraq war because of convenience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...