Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

A STRANGE HILL TO DIE ON

 

 

I confess I didn’t see this one coming: the Democratic Party has made forcing young women and girls to dress and undress in front of strange naked men a cornerstone of its political platform. Apparently Democrats are not allowed to dissent from this orthodoxy; at least, I haven’t noticed any who have done so.

 

It is, as I say, a weird hill to die on. Not only is the policy obviously wrong on the merits, it must be hugely unpopular. How do you suppose it polls? 85-15 against the Democrats? 90-10?

 

On Thursday, former University of Pennsylvania swimmer Paula Scanlan testified before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government. She described the experience of being forced to disrobe repeatedly in front of a man named Lia Thomas:

 

My teammates and I were forced to undress in the presence of Lia, a six-feet four-inch tall biological man fully-intact with male genitalia, 18 times per week. Some girls opted to change in bathroom stalls and others used the family bathroom to avoid this. When we tried to voice our concern to the Athletic Department, we were told that Lia swimming and being in our locker room was non-negotiable and we were offered psychological services to attempt to re-educate us to become comfortable with the idea of undressing in front of a male.

 

{snip}

 

The Democrats’ position on this issue–forcing young women to be naked in front of naked men in locker rooms, against their will–is so stupid that one wonders what lies behind it. Sometimes it seems that liberals deliberately take crazy positions, simply to show that they can. They want to rub our noses in the fact that–as they see it–they are in the driver’s seat, and we normals are powerless. Maybe that is what is going on here.

 

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2023/07/a-strange-hill-to-die-on.php

 

 

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
On 7/25/2023 at 9:58 PM, BillsFanNC said:

The Science (TM)

 

:lol:

 

 

 

ever watch Apocalypto.   one of the main story lines is the priest(rulers) had the calendar and knew when the eclipses would happen and end.  and used that to maintain their power.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

Democrats, Hysteria, and 'Threats to Democracy'

by Ward Clark

 

82ec5ce9-1c71-4318-a18f-d112e6cafbd2-860

 

Remember when Democrats were more rational, at least in comparison to today’s Democrats?

 

Senator Zell Miller was the last of the old Blue Dogs, having been both Governor of Georgia and a Senator from that State. New York’s Daniel Patrick Moynihan, while a committed liberal, was at least intelligent, well-spoken, and not subject to flights of fancy.

 

Whereas now, with what the modern Democrat Party considers its up-and-comers, there is a certain hysteria based on their damning everything counter to the “progressive” agenda as a threat to democracy.

 

{snip}

 

This sums things up very well. The Squad and their supporter’s hysterical statements about “threats to our democracy” are of a kind with their shrieks of “racism,” or “homophobia,” or any of the various terms they throw out like a six-year-old shouts “doody-head.”

 

These statements should be ignored. These are not serious people.

 

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2023/08/03/democrats-hysteria-and-threats-to-democracy-n786998

 

.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Democrats, Hysteria, and 'Threats to Democracy'

by Ward Clark

 

82ec5ce9-1c71-4318-a18f-d112e6cafbd2-860

 

Remember when Democrats were more rational, at least in comparison to today’s Democrats?

 

Senator Zell Miller was the last of the old Blue Dogs, having been both Governor of Georgia and a Senator from that State. New York’s Daniel Patrick Moynihan, while a committed liberal, was at least intelligent, well-spoken, and not subject to flights of fancy.

 

Whereas now, with what the modern Democrat Party considers its up-and-comers, there is a certain hysteria based on their damning everything counter to the “progressive” agenda as a threat to democracy.

 

{snip}

 

This sums things up very well. The Squad and their supporter’s hysterical statements about “threats to our democracy” are of a kind with their shrieks of “racism,” or “homophobia,” or any of the various terms they throw out like a six-year-old shouts “doody-head.”

 

These statements should be ignored. These are not serious people.

 

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2023/08/03/democrats-hysteria-and-threats-to-democracy-n786998

 

.

 

Problem is they still get voted in. The Squad are morons but the people who vote for them are bigger morons. Until they get voted out, we can't really ignore them.

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

A nation driven by cats, boxed wine, and Xanax. LOL

deserves to be repeated.

It's like he personally knows billstime and company.

Edited by Unforgiven
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Hahahahahahahahaha

 

 

Answer to question: They played like s**t

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
On 8/3/2023 at 3:35 PM, TSOL said:

2016 broke the left. 


 

QUESTIONING ELECTION RESULTS IS UNAMERICAN!  

 

The last time the Democrats admitted that a Republican had legitimately been elected president was in 1988.


Now that Donald Trump has been indicted for questioning the result of the 2020 presidential election, we should never forget that the last time the Democrats admitted that a Republican had legitimately been elected president was in 1988, when George H.W. Bush carried 40 states. Democrats have denounced every Republican president since then as illegitimate (including George W. Bush twice). Roll the tape:

 

(video at link)

 

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2023/08/how-dare-trump-question-the-election-result.php

 

  • Like (+1) 5
×
×
  • Create New...