Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

What ?

 

😂

 

 

This is Billstime level logic.

 

On par for that blithering idiot.

Posted
On 4/25/2023 at 8:41 PM, B-Man said:

 

DEMOCRATS FOR PEDOPHILIA

 

 

Anyone who has been paying attention knows that lots of liberals have been grooming kids in recent years. Generally, though, they don’t admit it: there are lots of good reasons, supposedly, why drag queens should invade little kids’ libraries, and ask children to stuff dollar bills into their G-strings at drag shows.

 

Here in Minnesota, we have something different: the Democratic Party is officially coming out in defense of pedophilia as a matter of law. Minnesota’s crazed DFL majorities have passed one extreme measure after another this session, but this one breaks new ground in service of pedophilia.

 

The bill is HF 1655, sponsored by a man pretending to be a woman named Leigh Finke. (https://www.leighformn.com”>Not pretending very successfully.) Finke’s bill is called the “Take Pride Act.” We might re-name it the “Take Pride in Abuse of Children Act.”

 

Understanding what is going on starts with the definition of “Sexual Orientation” under existing Minnesota law:

 

Subd. 44.Sexual orientation. “Sexual orientation” means having or being perceived as having an emotional, physical, or sexual attachment to another person without regard to the sex of that person or having or being perceived as having an orientation for such attachment, or having or being perceived as having a self-image or identity not traditionally associated with one’s biological maleness or femaleness. “Sexual orientation” does not include a physical or sexual attachment to children by an adult.

 

Note that last sentence. Whatever legal advantages accrue to a gay sexual orientation–and there are many–do not, currently, apply to pederasts.

 

Now note what Mr. Finke’s bill does: Along with creating all kinds of legal rights on behalf of transgenders, it changes the definition of “Sexual orientation” by deleting the exclusion of pederasty from the definition:

 

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2023/04/democrats-for-pedophilia.php

 

 

It's back.

 

They're hoping you won't notice.

 

 

Minnesota Senate restores pro-pedophile language in public safety bill

 

21ebb3eb-849e-4f44-b40f-ecdf5da41fba-860

 

As I noted before, and will repeat here, the language does not legalize pedophilia. If you practice pedophilia and are caught, you can still be prosecuted.

However, if you are discriminated against due to your avowed attraction to minors–for instance if your landlord sees that you have a sex doll representing a child–you may have cause to sue. Similarly, a restaurant that threw you out for wearing a t-shirt expressing your love of having sex with children, the restaurant could not throw you out in the way they could eject a Nazi or homophobe.

 

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2023/05/13/minnesota-senate-restores-pro-pedophile-language-in-public-safety-bill-n550461

Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

How can someone be this stupid ?

 

 

Good question, let's ask BillStime.

Edited by wnyguy
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...